Life depends on water and there are no substitutes. Fundamental to the functioning of the Earth’s system, water is a renewable natural resource that is available in finite amounts. Human appropriation of freshwater resources is mainly used for agriculture. To prevent loss of natural habitat and biodiversity, the growing demand for agricultural products will likely need to be met by enhancing crop yields in currently cultivated land rather than through farmland expansion. Because of local limitations in water availability, irrigation can be sustainably expanded only in part by the currently rain-fed farmland. Any further withdrawal from water bodies would deplete environmental flows or groundwater stocks. Local water deficits (i.e., gaps between availability and demand, including water for food) are often compensated for by food imports from water-rich regions and the associated transfers of “virtual water.” Thus, water is a strategic resource that has become strongly globalized and controlled by a few countries, while the rest of the world is in conditions of trade dependency. Water-saving strategies—based on food waste reduction, moderation of diets, use of more suitable crops, or increased water use efficiency—need to be adopted in order to meet human needs without compromising water sustainability.
- Water sustainability
- Water security
- Food security
- Globalization of water
- Environmental flows
- Water commodification
“As the rain and the snow come down from heaven,and do not return to it without watering the earthand making it bud and flourish, …”
Water is essential for life on Earth and plays a crucial role in determining the global distribution of biomes as well as habitats for aquatic and terrestrial species (e.g., Whittaker, 1975). It also shapes the land surface through erosion and deposition processes; transports sediments, nutrients, and pollutants; and drives the dispersal of a number of species and pathogens (e.g., Dunne & Leopold, 1978). Water is also an important determinant of the Earth’s climate because of heat storage in water bodies, the impact of evaporation and transpiration on the surface energy balance, and the effect of water vapor on atmospheric radiative transfer. Water availability affects the productivity of terrestrial ecosystems, the rate of global biogeochemical cycles, and the composition of plant, microbial, and animal communities (e.g., Rodriguez-Iturbe & Porporato, 2005). The impact of water resources on human societies is evidenced by the critical role of water in a number of human activities, such as agriculture, manufacturing, energy generation, and mining.
The majority of terrestrial ecosystems and most human activities rely on freshwater, which accounts for about 3% of the global water resources (with the remaining 97% being in the oceans). Most of the freshwater on Earth is in ice caps (≈69%) and groundwater (≈30%), while only about 1% is stored in surface water bodies and vegetation.
Atmospheric water reaches the land surface as precipitation and then either flows downhill as surface runoff or infiltrates into the ground, thereby contributing to root zone soil moisture and groundwater recharge (Fig. 12.1). Water retained by capillary forces in shallow unsaturated soils is often termed “green water” because it is largely used by plants and soil microorganisms that can exert the suction required for extraction. The majority of terrestrial plants relies on green water. Conversely, groundwater (i.e., in the saturated portion of below-ground water stocks) and surface water are often referred to as “blue water” (Falkenmark & Rockström, 2004).
Water leaves land masses either in the liquid phase as blue water flows, or as water vapor fluxes associated with evapotranspiration (i.e., green water flows) (Fig. 12.2). Globally, blue water flows account for about 40% and green water flows for 60% of the water fluxes from land masses. These proportions, however, vary across geographic regions and have been altered by human action.
The two major anthropogenic disturbances to the water cycle are associated with land use change and irrigation. These phenomena have opposite effects on hydrological processes. Land use change—typically in the form of deforestation and land conversion to agriculture—tends to reduce evapotranspiration and increase runoff (e.g., Bonan, 2008). In other words, it reduces green water flows and increases blue water flows. Conversely, irrigation, which accounts for the majority (≈70%) of water withdrawals for human activities, uses blue water from streams, lakes, and aquifers to enhance agricultural yields by increasing crop evapotranspiration (i.e., turning blue water into green water flows). In many regions of the world, the latter effect is predominant and explains the observed reduction in river flows in major agricultural regions. Indeed, some rivers (e.g., the Rio Grande, Colorado, Nile, and Yellow Rivers) are so strongly depleted that they do not reach the ocean anymore. Particularly emblematic are the cases of endorheic basins, such as Lake Chad, The Dead Sea, The Aral Sea, and Lake Urmia, which are drying out because of water withdrawals from their tributaries (e.g., Stone, 2015). Likewise, many aquifers around the world are strongly depleted because withdrawals (often for irrigation or municipal uses) are occurring at rates exceeding those of groundwater recharge, a phenomenon often known as “overpumping” (Konikow, 2011; Wada et al., 2010). Moreover, agriculture may affect the water cycle through the impacts of irrigation and land use change on precipitation, evapotranspiration and runoff (e.g., Bonan, 2008).
Changes in the water cycle are also emerging as a result of climate warming, which causes a slight intensification of the water cycle with a 2–3% increase both in global precipitation and evapotranspiration per Celsius degree of global temperature increase. These global averages, however, do not show how local precipitation is expected to either substantially decrease or increase depending on the location. As a general pattern, humid regions (e.g., at the equator and midlatitudes) are expected to become wetter, while drier regions (e.g., the subtropics) drier (Held & Soden, 2006). The impact on crop production, however, should also account for the effect of increased atmospheric CO2 on photosynthesis and the nutritional properties of crops (Myers et al., 2014).
Thus, water is a renewable resource that is conserved within the earth system. Some water stocks (e.g., glaciers, aquifers, and endorheic lakes), however, are undergoing depletion. Likewise, in some areas, water quality is degraded by pollution from chemicals, suspended sediments, and pathogens. Despite its renewability, water is available on Earth only in limited amounts. Therefore, some human activities are constrained by the pace of the water cycle, and competition often exists between human uses and environmental needs.
Human Appropriation of Water Resources
Human societies use “blue” water resources for agriculture, industrial, energy, and household needs. The majority of these uses are related to crop production, in the form of irrigation water (Fig. 12.2). Therefore, contrary to common perception, the global water crisis is all about finding solutions to mitigate and prevent hunger rather than thirst (e.g., Falkenmark & Rockström, 2004). Thus, problems of water scarcity are closely related to important constraints on food production. While economic access is often recognized as the main cause for undernutrition, limited availability in periods of drought is typically the driver overlying spikes in food prices and associated food crises. Insufficient caloric intake may cause acute malnutrition (weight loss and/or inability to gain weight), a major cause for child mortality. Insufficient protein intake in the first 1000 days in the life of a child can cause chronic malnutrition (i.e., stunting) with permanent physical and cognitive impairment in children. Overall, malnutrition affects about 800–900 million people worldwide. Even though protein-rich food products tend to require three to six times more water per calorie than plant food, this chapter shows how the water needed to eradicate undernutrition can be sustainably met by the global water resources of the planet.
In this context, there is a difference between water withdrawals from water bodies and water consumption (i.e., evapotranspiration) by agriculture. Only a fraction of the water that is withdrawn from water bodies and applied to cropland is actually evapotranspired. The difference between the two eventually contributes to return flow to nearby water bodies and is available downstream for human uses or environmental need. Conversely, the water lost through evapotranspiration (or “consumptive use”) will become available again after precipitation at a rate determined by the pace of the water cycle.
The energy sector is also a major water consumer, though at much smaller rates than that of agriculture. Almost all forms of energy production require water, both for the extraction of energy resources and for power generation. It has been estimated that energy production (2014 data) accounts for 400 km3/year of blue water withdrawals and 50 km3/year of consumptive use (IEA, 2016). These estimates include blue water for primary energy source extraction and power generation (Table 12.1) but do not include green water consumption for energy production from biomass (e.g., wood, bioethanol, and biodiesel) and losses from reservoirs for hydropower generation. The total water consumption for biofuel production is roughly 200 km3/year (Rulli, Bellomi, Cazzoli, Carolis, & D’Odorico, 2016), which is about 2.4% of the water use in agriculture (Table 12.1).
Environmental Impacts of Water Withdrawals
The impacts of overpumping differ depending on whether it affects aquifers or surface water bodies. Many regions of the world, including the North-American Southwest, Northern Africa, the Indo-Gangetic Plain, the North China Plain, and the Arabian Peninsula, are affected by groundwater depletion (Konikow, 2011). Globally, groundwater depletion accounts for 20–33% of global groundwater withdrawals (Table 12.1).
The case of overuse of surface water resources is different because it raises concerns about the loss of aquatic habitat. Indeed, freshwater ecosystems exhibit high levels of biodiversity but are susceptible to much greater extinction rates (about five times) than those of other terrestrial ecosystems (Postel & Richter, 2003). To maintain biodiverse freshwater ecosystems, we need to ensure that suitable minimum flow and water quality requirements are met and that the timing, frequency, and magnitude of both high and low flows are not disrupted. Ecologists have defined minimum flow requirements (or “environmental flows”) to place a cap on sustainable water use (e.g., Pastor, Ludwig, Biemans, Hoff, & Kabat, 2014; Richter, Davis, Apse, & Konrad, 2012).
Water Use for Agriculture
Most of the agricultural production on Earth is rain-fed and does not rely on irrigation. Roughly 18% of the global cultivated land is presently irrigated (Fig. 12.3) and contributes to about 40% of global agricultural production (e.g., Rosa et al., 2018). Rain-fed agriculture relies only on green water resources, while irrigated agriculture uses both green and blue water.
Green water is often taken for granted because it is directly acquired with the land without requiring investments in infrastructure for its capture or institutional arrangements to define the right to use it. The choice to plant certain crops may strongly affect evapotranspiration losses, with an indirect impact also on runoff. These effects of agriculture on croplands’ hydrologic response are often ignored.
Sustainable and Unsustainable Water Use for Irrigation
Estimates of global water consumption for irrigation (Table 12.1) vary between 900 and 1280 km3/year (Mekonnen & Hoekstra, 2012; Siebert & Döll, 2010), while withdrawals range between 2410 (Jägermeyr, Pastor, Biemans, & Gerten, 2017) and 2560 km3/year (Sacks et al., 2009). Even though these values are well within the sustainability limits (or “planetary boundaries”) identified by some authors (≈ 1100–4500 km3/year, Gerten et al., 2013; Rockström et al., 2009) and are way below the global estimates of blue water flows (4800 km3/year, see Table 12.1), there are numerous instances of locally unsustainable water uses.
As a major form of human appropriation of blue water resources, agriculture is the main reason why environmental flows have been strongly depleted in many rivers worldwide. About 41% of water withdrawals for irrigation (Jägermeyr et al., 2017) and 40% of irrigation water consumption (Rosa et al., 2018) are unsustainable because they occur at the expenses of environmental flows and/or groundwater stocks (Fig. 12.3).
About 30% of agricultural water consumption is used for livestock production, mostly (>90%) in the form of green water for feed, fodder, and rangeland grazing (Table 12.1). It takes much more water to produce a calorie of food from animal products than from crops. The consumption of meat-rich diets remains a water-intensive (and carbon-intensive) lifestyle (e.g., Davis et al., 2016; Tilman, Balzer, Hill, & Befort, 2011). Thus, the observed trend of decreasing cereal consumption and increasing reliance on animal products with increasing levels of affluence (Tilman et al., 2011) is expected to enhance the human pressure on global freshwater resources (e.g., Davis et al., 2016). Are these hydrologic effects of dietary changes on water consumption of the same order of magnitude as those of demographic growth? Using a GDP-based projection of dietary change, Davis et al. (2016) estimated that by 2050 the average per capita water consumption for food production will increase by 19% from the present level, while population growth is expected to increase by 35%, reaching 9.8 billion people by 2050. Thus, the hydrologic impact of dietary shifts in the burgeoning developing societies is expected to be of the same order of magnitude as demographic growth (Fig. 12.4).
Projections of Future Water Needs for Food Production
To meet the food needs of the increasing global population while eradicating undernourishment, humanity will likely need to reduce food waste and the consumption of resource-intensive products (e.g., Foley et al., 2011). In fact, there are limits to the sustainable increase in food production, and some of these limits are associated with water resources (Falkenmark & Rockström, 2004).
Recent studies have stressed the danger of increasing food production by expanding agriculture because it would result in habitat destruction, biodiversity loss and CO2 emissions. Therefore, scientists have been advocating for the intensification of agriculture in land that is presently cultivated (or “land sparing”) (Foley et al., 2011). Intensification typically requires the use of fertilizers, irrigation, and other modern technology to close the yield gap, which is the difference between actual and maximum potential yields. Yield gap estimates are typically developed without evaluating to what extent the local hydrologic conditions allow for a sustainable development of irrigation. Indeed, large tracts of agricultural land are not suitable for sustainable irrigation, while in 26% of currently rain-fed areas it is possible to irrigate without depleting environmental flows or groundwater stocks (Rosa et al., 2018). If at the same time current unsustainable irrigation practices (Fig. 12.3) were eliminated, sustainable irrigation expansion would allow for a 24% increase in global food production that could feed an additional 1.8 billion people (Rosa et al., 2018). Collectively, these results demonstrate the existence of limits to the sustainable appropriation of water resources for agriculture and to humanity’s ability to sustainably increase food production. Further needs for water resources for food production will need to result from water conservation (D’Odorico et al., 2018).
Pathways to Water Conservation
A more sustainable approach to water and food security looks at a reduction of consumption as an alternative to increasing production. The ongoing pattern of overconsumption can be broken by reducing food waste, promoting the shift to diets that are less resource intensive, and decreasing the amount of food intake in overnourished populations.
About 24% of the water used for food production is lost through food waste (Kummu et al., 2012). These losses occur at different stages along the “farm to fork” supply chain, depending on the type of food, access to refrigeration and transportation facilities, and household habits. In the last few years, there has been a push toward a circular economy of food to reduce resource consumption and waste accumulation by repurposing and reusing food products (e.g., Stahel, 2016). In some countries, the destruction of unsold food by retailers or distributors is avoided through timely donations to food charities. Some food types can be reused to produce other food commodities, or utilized as feed, compost or substrate for biogas production. Likewise, nutrient-rich wastewater can be reused for irrigation, biogas production, or to recover critical nutrients such as phosphorus (Cordell, Drangert, & White, 2009).
Changes in Diets
A reduction in human demand for water resources could result from a switch to less meat-intensive diets. For instance, the shift to vegetarian or pescatarian diets would save 18–21% of the water used for food production and improve human health (Davis et al., 2016; Tilman & Clark, 2014). Human diets are the result of historical habits and cultural heritages and are therefore hard to change (e.g., Wellesley, Happer, & Froggatt, 2015). A positive sign can be seen in the ongoing livestock transition, the replacement of resource-intensive bovine meat with pork and poultry (Davis et al., 2016; Thornton, 2010).
Crop Water Management
While transpiration is a productive water loss from terrestrial ecosystems, evaporation does not contribute to plant growth and can even negatively affect soil properties by increasing salinity. Therefore, to produce more food with less water, agricultural practices need to reduce evaporation and maximize transpiration (Falkenmark & Rockström, 2004). Improvement in water productivity based on soil water management could reduce current water withdrawals for irrigation by about 1200 km3/year (Jägermeyr et al., 2016).
Improving Crop Suitability by Replacing Crops
Improvements in water use efficiency to produce “more crop per drop” can be attained either by using new cultivars or by changing crop distribution. The current distribution of crops often makes a suboptimal use of water resources. Water-demanding crops are often planted in arid and semiarid regions. Perennial plants are often cultivated in climates affected by episodic droughts that could kill what took years to grow. Alternative crop distributions can maximize production and feed about 825 million additional people, while saving 12% of irrigation water without sacrificing crop diversity, nutritional value, or land (Davis, Rulli, Seveso, & D’Odorico, 2017). This approach does not require major investments in modern technology that small-scale subsistence farmers in the developing world might not be able to afford.
Water Savings through Trade
Another option to save water is through trade, that is, by producing crops in more suitable areas and exporting them to other regions of the world. Indeed, the current patterns of trade contribute to water savings for about 350 km3/year (Hoekstra & Chapagain, 2008). Other studies found smaller savings and documented their growth over time, from roughly 50 km3/year in 1986 to 240 km3/year in 2008 (Dalin, Konar, Hanasaki, Rinaldo, & Rodríguez-Iturbe, 2012). Further savings could be attained by reshaping trade patterns and future trade intensification.
Globalization of Water
When the withdrawal and consumption of freshwater resources are examined at the global scale, human uses are dwarfed by the magnitude of global runoff and no major environmental impact would seem to emerge from human action (Table 12.1). At a local scale, however, water resources can be strongly stressed by agricultural, municipal, and industrial uses. Several regions of the world are in a state of chronic water deficit because their population by far exceeds the number of people the local land and water resources are able to feed. The existence of countries that are strongly water and food deficient appears to be paradoxical, as one would expect that these conditions would trigger mass emigrations, social unrest, and conflict over the scarce water resources. However, in general this is not the case because trade allows societies to indirectly rely on water resources existing in other regions of the world (Allan, 1998). In other words, the trade of food commodities is associated with a virtual transfer of the water resources required for the production of those goods. Known as “virtual water trade,” this mechanism contributes to the globalization of water resources.
The international trade of virtual water accounts for about 25% of water use in agriculture, including both green and blue water (Mekonnen & Hoekstra, 2012). Thus, while 10–16% of the evapotranspiration by the terrestrial biosphere is contributed by agroecosystems, roughly one-fourth of it is virtually traded (Table 12.1). In the last two decades and a half, virtual water trade has more than doubled in volume and the trade network has become more interconnected. Net exports are mostly contributed by a handful of countries, such as Brazil, the USA, Argentina, Thailand, Canada and Australia (Carr, D’Odorico, Laio, & Ridolfi, 2013). These results suggest that water is a strategic resource that is strongly globalized and controlled by few countries, while the rest of the world is in conditions of trade dependency.
Water is also globalized though transnational land investments, a phenomenon that has intensified over the last decade and a half. Since 2002, about half a million square kilometers of land (i.e., 1.7 times the area of Italy) have been acquired for agriculture and forestry (The Land Matrix, 2017). Land investors can be domestic, foreign, or mixed domestic-foreign ventures that operate as private agribusiness corporations, government-owned companies, or retirement funds (Cotula, 2013). Investors often target both the land and the water that comes with it. Thus, land acquisitions often become opportunities to secure access to both land and water resources abroad (Dell’Angelo, Rulli, & D’Odorico, 2018; Rulli, Saviori, & D’Odorico, 2013). “Water grabbing” is defined as the appropriation of water resources by powerful investors at the expenses of local communities (Dell’Angelo et al., 2018). Appropriation mechanisms may include the redefinition or reallocation of water rights, river diversions, dam constructions, and virtual appropriation of water resources through land acquisitions (Mehta, Veldwisch, & Franco, 2012; Rulli et al., 2013). Interestingly, this phenomenon exceeds the rate of water grabbing from future generations through groundwater depletion (Table 12.1).
Freshwater is crucial to sustain ecological function, food security, energy production, and investments in a variety of businesses. With challenges to water sustainability emerging from growing societal pressures, humanity is facing the trilemma of allocating water to food, energy, or environmental needs (D’Odorico et al., 2018).
How did we reach this point? There have been some major revolutions in the food–water system. The industrial revolution brought about new sources of energy and power, which allowed for the withdrawal and transport of unprecedented amounts of water from surface water bodies and aquifers and the expansion of irrigation to areas not suitable for gravity-driven distribution systems. The green revolution in the decades following World War II led to a major growth in agricultural production with an incredible increase in crop yields. The early phases of the green revolution hinged on the invention of nitrogen fertilizers (e.g., Erisman, Sutton, Galloway, Klimont, & Winiwarter, 2008). At that point, water remained a major limiting factor for crop production, which led to a renewed interest in irrigation infrastructure and improvements in irrigation efficiency.
More recently, the water and food system have been transformed by a “trade revolution.” The intensification of trade has allowed some populations to rely on water resources existing elsewhere (Allan, 1998).
A “fourth food revolution” (D’Odorico et al., 2018) is associated with large-scale land acquisitions, a phenomenon that has rapidly accelerated in the last few years, likely in response to recent food crises (Cotula, 2013; Rulli et al., 2013). After some trade-dependent countries experienced conditions of food insufficiency, several agribusiness corporations started to look at regions of the developing world where yields are low because of the lack of investments in modern agricultural technology. This phenomenon contributes to the transition from subsistence or small-scale farming to large-scale commercial agriculture and is often associated with large-scale investments in agricultural land.
All these “revolutions” led to major changes in agriculture, through industrialization, new technology, globalization, and transition in farming systems. With these changes, humanity has been trying to meet the increasing needs of human societies by sustaining ongoing growth trends in agriculture. Sadly, these changes are frequently accompanied by unsustainable practices and acute social injustices working against the poorest part of the populations. There is the need for new approaches that focus on a reduction in consumption. The pathways to water saving reviewed in this chapter could substantially reduce human consumption of water resources.
Allan, J. A. (1998). Virtual water: A strategic resource. Ground Water, 36, 545–547.
Bonan, G. B. (2008). Ecological climatology (p. 550). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Carr, J. A., D’Odorico, P., Laio, F., & Ridolfi, L. (2013). Recent history and geography of virtual water trade. PLoS One, 8, e55825.
Chow, V. T. (1988). Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Cordell, D., Drangert, J. O., & White, S. (2009). The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought. Global Environmental Change, 19, 292–305.
Cotula, L. (2013). The new enclosures? Polanyi, international investment law and the global land rush. Third World Quarterly, 34, 1605–1629.
D’Odorico, P., Davis, K. F., Rosa, L., Carr, J. A., Gephart, J., Seekell, D. A., et al. (2018). The food-energy-water nexus. Reviews of Geophysics, 56, 456–531.
Dalin, C., Konar, M., Hanasaki, N., Rinaldo, A., & Rodríguez-Iturbe, I. (2012). Evolution of the global virtual water trade network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 5989–5994.
Davis, K. F., Gephart, J. A., Emery, K. A., Leach, A. M., Galloway, J. N., & D’Odorico, P. (2016). Meeting future food demand with current agricultural resources. Global Environmental Change, 39, 125–132.
Davis, K. F., Rulli, M. C., Seveso, A., & D’Odorico, P. (2017). Increase in food production and reduction in water use through optimized crop distribution. Nature Geosciences, 10, 919–924. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-017-0004-5
Dell’Angelo, J., Rulli, M. C., & D’Odorico, P. (2018). The global water grabbing syndrome. Ecological Economics, 143, 276–285.
Dunne, T., & Leopold, L. B. (1978). Water in environmental planning. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
Erisman, J. W., Sutton, M. A., Galloway, J., Klimont, Z., & Winiwarter, W. (2008). How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nature Geoscience, 1, 636.
Falkenmark, M., & Rockström, J. (2004). Balancing water for humans and nature: The new approach in ecohydrology. London: Earthscan.
Foley, J. A., et al. (2011). Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature, 478, 337–342.
Gerten, D., Hoff, H., Rockström, J., Jägermeyr, J., Kummu, M., & Pastor, A. V. (2013). Towards a revised planetary boundary for consumptive freshwater use: Role of environmental flow requirements. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 551–558.
Held, I. M., & Soden, B. J. (2006). Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. Journal of Climate, 19, 5686–5699.
Hoekstra, A. Y., & Chapagain, A. (2008). Globalization of water. New York: Wiley.
Hoekstra, A. Y., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2012). The water footprint of humanity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 3232–3237.
IEA (2016). World Energy Outlook 2016. International Energy Agency.
Jägermeyr, J., Gerten, D., Schaphoff, S., Heinke, J., Lucht, W., & Rockström, J. (2016). Integrated crop water management might sustainably halve the global food gap. Environmental Research Letters, 11, 025002.
Jägermeyr, J., Pastor, A., Biemans, H., & Gerten, D. (2017). Reconciling irrigated food production with environmental flows for sustainable development goals implementation. Nature Communications, 8, 15900. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15900
Konikow, L. F. (2011). Contribution of global groundwater depletion since 1900 to sea-level rise. Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L17401. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048604
Kummu, M., de Moel, H., Porkka, M., Siebert, S., Varis, O., & Ward, P. J. (2012). Lost food, wasted resources: Global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Science of the Total Environment, 438, 477–489.
Mehta, L., Veldwisch, G. J., & Franco, J. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Water grabbing? Focus on the (re) appropriation of finite water resources. Water Alternatives, 5, 193–207.
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). National water footprint accounts: The green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 48. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands.
Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2012). A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems, 15, 401–415.
Myers, S. S., et al. (2014). Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition. Nature, 510, 139–142.
Pastor, A. V., Ludwig, F., Biemans, H., Hoff, H., & Kabat, P. (2014). Accounting for environmental flow requirements in global water assessments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18, 5041–5059.
Postel, S., & Richter, B. (2003). Rivers for life: Managing water for people and nature. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Richter, B. D., Davis, M. M., Apse, C., & Konrad, C. (2012). A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection. River Research and Applications, 28, 1312–1321.
Rockström, J., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.
Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., & Porporato, A. (2005). Ecohydrology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosa, L., Rulli, M. C., Davis, K. F., Chiarelli, D. D., Passera, C., & D’Odorico, P. (2018). Sustainable yield gap closure through irrigation intensification. Environmental Research Letters, 13, 104002.
Rulli, M.C., Bellomi, D., Cazzoli, A., De Carolis, G., & D’Odorico, P. (2016). The water-land-food nexus of first-generation biofuels. Scientific Reports, 6, 22521. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22521
Rulli, M. C., Saviori, A., & D’Odorico, P. (2013). Global land and water grabbing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110, 892–897.
Sacks, W. J., Cook, B. I., Buenning, N., Levis, S., & Helkowski, J. H. (2009). Effects of global irrigation on the near-surface climate. Climate Dynamics, 33, 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0445-z
Siebert, S., & Döll, P. (2010). Quantifying blue and green virtual water contents in global crop production as well as potential production losses without irrigation. Journal of Hydrology, 384, 198–217.
Siebert, S., Henrich, V., Frenken, K. & Burke, J. (2013). Global map of irrigation areas version 5. Bonn, Germany/Rome, Italy: Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University/FAO.
Stahel, W. R. (2016). Circular economy: A new relationship with our goods and materials would save resources and energy and create local jobs. Nature, 531, 435–439.
Stone, R. (2015). Saving Iran’s great salt lake. Science, 349, 1044–1047.
The Land Matrix. (2017). The Land Matrix Global Observatory. Retrieved December 1, 2019 from www.landmatrix.org.
Thornton, P. K. (2010). Livestock production: Recent trends, future prospects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2853–2867.
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011). Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 20260–20264.
Tilman, D., & Clark, M. (2014). Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health. Nature, 515, 518–522.
Wada, Y., van Beek, L. P., van Kempen, C. M., Reckman, J. W., Vasak, S., & Bierkens, M. F. (2010). Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophysical Research Letters, 37. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044571
Wada, Y., Flörke, M., Hanasaki, N., Eisner, S., Fischer, G., Tramberend, S., et al. (2016). Modeling global water use for the 21st century: Water Futures and Solutions (WFaS) initiative and its approaches. Geoscientific Model Development, 9, 175–222.
Wellesley, L., Happer, C., & Froggatt, A. (2015). Changing climate, changing diets: Pathway to lower meat consumption, Chatham House Report, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London.
Whittaker, R. H. (1975). Chapter 5: Communities and ecosystems. New York: McMillan Press.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
D’Odorico, P., Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2020). Sustaining Water Resources. In: Al-Delaimy, W., Ramanathan, V., Sánchez Sorondo, M. (eds) Health of People, Health of Planet and Our Responsibility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31125-4_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31124-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31125-4