Advertisement

Phenomenal Aspects of the Self

  • Majid Davoody BeniEmail author
Chapter
  • 104 Downloads
Part of the New Directions in Philosophy and Cognitive Science book series (NDPCS)

Abstract

There are different accounts of the phenomenal aspects of the self. This chapter reviews three important accounts of the self. These are the Integrated Information Theory of consciousness (IIT), the resting-state-based theory of consciousness, and the Free Energy Principle (FEP)-based theory of (self-)consciousness. Firstly, I argue that all of these theories can be construed along the lines of SR. Moreover, I argue that because these theories could be related together in a meaningful way, together they form a comprehensive structural account of consciousness. I also present a structural account of intentionality. In this way, the chapter indicates that phenomenal aspects of the self could be construed along the lines of structural realism and in harmony with the structural realist theory of the self.

Keywords

Integrated Information Theory of consciousness Resting-state-based theory of consciousness Free-energy-based theory of consciousness Counterfactual depth Temporal depth Structural realist theory of consciousness Structural realist theory of intentionality 

References

  1. Adams, R. A., Shipp, S., & Friston, K. J. (2013). Predictions Not Commands: Active Inference in the Motor System. Brain Structure and Function, 218(3), 611–643.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0475-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M., & Friston, K. J. (2016). From Cognitivism to Autopoiesis: Towards a Computational Framework for the Embodied Mind. Synthese, 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-016-1288-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apps, M. A. J., & Tsakiris, M. (2014). The Free-Energy Self: A Predictive Coding Account of Self-Recognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 41, 85–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2013.01.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, D. M. (1968). A Materialist Theory of the Mind. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  5. Barrett, A. B. (2014). An Integration of Integrated Information Theory with Fundamental Physics. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 63.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beni, M. D. (2018a). A Structuralist Defence of the Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(9–10), 75–98. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/jcs/2018/00000025/f0020009/art00003
  7. Beni, M. D. (2018b). Much Ado About Nothing: Toward a Structural Realist Theory of Intentionality. Axiomathes.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-018-9372-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beni, M. D. (2018c). The Downward Path to Epistemic Informational Structural Realism. Acta Analytica, 33(2), 181–197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-017-0333-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Block, N. (1995). On a Confusion About a Function of Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18(2), 227–247.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00038188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brentano, F. (1995). Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (L. L. McAlister, Ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Buckley, C. L., Kim, C. S., McGregor, S., & Seth, A. K. (2017). The Free Energy Principle for Action and Perception: A Mathematical Review. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 81, 55–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMP.2017.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colombo, M., & Hartmann, S. (2015). Bayesian Cognitive Science, Unification, and Explanation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 68(2), axv036.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axv036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colombo, M., & Series, P. (2012). Bayes in the Brain—On Bayesian Modelling in Neuroscience. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(3), 697–723.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axr043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crane, T. (1998). Intentionality as the Mark of the Mental. In A. O’Hear (Ed.), Contemporary Issues in the Philosophy of Mind (Vol. 43, pp. 229–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100004380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crane, T. (2001). Intentional Objects. Ratio, 14(4), 336–349.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9329.00168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crane, T. (2013). The Objects of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682744.001.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crane, T. (2014). Aspects of Psychologism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cummins, R. C. (1996). Representations, Targets, and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Currie, G. (2016). Models as Fictions, Fictions as Models. The Monist, 99(3), 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dehaene, S., Kerszberg, M., & Changeux, J.-P. (2006). A Neuronal Model of a Global Workspace in Effortful Cognitive Tasks. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 929(1), 152–165.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05714.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Esfeld, M., & Lam, V. (2008). Moderate Structural Realism About Space-Time. Synthese, 160(1), 27–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9076-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fotopoulou, A. (2012). Towards a Psychodynamic Neuroscience. In From the Couch to the Lab (pp. 25–46). Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780199600526.003.0003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Frank, S. A. (2012). Natural Selection. V. How to Read the Fundamental Equations of Evolutionary Change in Terms of Information Theory. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 25(12), 2377–2396.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frigg, R. (2010). Models and Fiction. Synthese, 172(2), 251–268.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9505-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friston, K. J. (2010). The Free-Energy Principle: A Unified Brain Theory? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Friston, K. J. (2018). Am I Self-Conscious? Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 579.  https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2018.00579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Friston, K. J., & Kiebel, S. (2009). Predictive Coding Under the Free-Energy Principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1211–1221.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friston, K. J., Rigoli, F., Ognibene, D., Mathys, C., Fitzgerald, T., & Pezzulo, G. (2015). Active Inference and Epistemic Value. Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(4), 187–214.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1020053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Friston, K. J., Samothrakis, S., & Montague, R. (2012). Active Inference and Agency: Optimal Control Without Cost Functions. Biological Cybernetics, 106(8–9), 523–541.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-012-0512-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Friston, K. J., & Stephan, K. E. (2007). Free-Energy and the Brain. Synthese, 159(3), 417–458.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9237-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Friston Karl J., Wiese Wanja, and Hobson J. Allan Markovian Monism: From Cartesian Duality to Riemannian Manifolds.Google Scholar
  32. Gallagher, S., & Daly, A. (2018). Dynamical Relations in the Self-Pattern. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 664.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00664 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Godfrey-Smith, P. (2009). Models and Fictions in Science. Philosophical Studies, 143(1), 101–116.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9313-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2003). Functional Connectivity in the Resting Brain: A Network Analysis of the Default Mode Hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(1), 253–258.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0135058100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jacob, P. (2014). Review of Tim Crane’s the Objects of Thought. Retrieved February 17, 2018, from https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/the-objects-of-thought/
  36. Joshi, N. J., Tononi, G., Koch, C., Bonner, J., McShea, D., Adami, C., … Dijkstra, E. (2013). The Minimal Complexity of Adapting Agents Increases with Fitness. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003111.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khachouf, O. T., Poletti, S., & Pagnoni, G. (2013). The Embodied Transcendental: A Kantian Perspective on Neurophenomenology. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(611).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00611
  38. Klein, C., & Barron, A. (2016). Insects Have the Capacity for Subjective Experience. Animal Sentience: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Animal Feeling, 1(9). Retrieved from https://animalstudiesrepository.org/animsent/vol1/iss9/1
  39. Koch, C. (2012). Consciousness: Confessions of a Romantic Reductionist. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koch, C., & Tononi, G. (2013, March 7). Can a Photodiode Be Conscious? The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/03/07/can-photodiode-be-conscious/
  41. Kriegel, U. (2007). Intentional Inexistence and Phenomenal Intentionality. Philosophical Perspectives, 21(1), 307–340.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00129.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ladyman, J. (2007). On the Identity and Diversity of Objects in a Structure. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes. Oxford University Press The Aristotelian Society.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20619100
  43. Lamme, V. A. F. (2006). Towards a True Neural Stance on Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(11), 494–501.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Limanowski, J., & Blankenburg, F. (2013). Minimal Self-Models and the Free Energy Principle. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(547).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00547
  45. Limanowski, J., & Friston, K. (2018). ‘Seeing the Dark’: Grounding Phenomenal Transparency and Opacity in Precision Estimation for Active Inference. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(643).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00643
  46. Mackie, J. L. (1973). Truth, Probability and Paradox: Studies in Philosophical Logic. Clarendon Press. Retrieved from https://global.oup.com/academic/product/truth-probability-and-paradox-9780198244028?cc=ir&lang=en&
  47. Mackie, J. L. (1977). Dispositions, Grounds, and Causes. Synthese, 34, 99–107.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1282-8_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nagel, T. (1974). What Is It Like to Be A Bat? The Philosophical Review, 83(4), 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Northoff, G. (2014a). Unlocking the Brain: Volume 1: Coding. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Northoff, G. (2014b). Unlocking the Brain: Volume 2: Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199826995.001.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Northoff, G. (2018). The Spontaneous Brain: From the Mind-Body to the World-Brain Problem. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/spontaneous-brain
  52. Northoff, G., Tsuchiya, N., & Saigo, H. (2019). Mathematics and the Brain—A Category Theoretic Approach to Go Beyond the Neural Correlates of Consciousness. BioRxiv, 674242.  https://doi.org/10.1101/674242
  53. O’Brien, G., & Opie, J. (2004). Notes Toward a Structuralist Theory of Mental Representation. In H. Clapin, P. J. Staines, & P. P. Slezak (Eds.), Representation in Mind: New Approaches to Mental Representation. Pergamon: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  54. Oizumi, M., Albantakis, L., Tononi, G., Thompson, C., Tononi, G., Tononi, G., … Koch, C. (2014). From the Phenomenology to the Mechanisms of Consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(5), e1003588.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Psillos, S. (2002). Causation and Explanation. Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Psillos, S. (2006). The Structure, the Whole Structure, and Nothing But the Structure. Philosophy of Science, 73(5), 560–570.  https://doi.org/10.1086/518326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramstead, M. J. D., Badcock, P. B., & Friston, K. J. (2018). Variational Neuroethology: Answering Further Questions. Physics of Life Reviews.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2018.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rosenthal, D. (2012). Higher-Order Awareness, Misrepresentation and Function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367(1594), 1424–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Searle, J. R. (2013, January 10). Can Information Theory Explain Consciousness? The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2013/01/10/can-information-theory-explain-consciousness/
  62. Shagrir, O. (2012). Structural Representations and the Brain. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 63(3), 519–545.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axr038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  64. Shea, N. (2016). Representational Development Need Not Be Explicable-by-Content. In Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 223–240). Cham: Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26485-1_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Swoyer, C. (1991). Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning. Synthese, 87(3), 449–508.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00499820 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tononi, G. (2004). An Information Integration Theory of Consciousness. BMC Neuroscience, 5(1), 42.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-5-42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tononi, G. (2015). Integrated Information Theory. Scholarpedia, 10(1), 4164.  https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.4164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tononi, G. (2017a). Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness: Some Ontological Considerations. In The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness (pp. 621–633). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119132363.ch44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tononi, G. (2017b). The Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness: An Outline. In The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness (pp. 243–256). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119132363.ch17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M., & Koch, C. (2016). Integrated Information Theory: From Consciousness to Its Physical Substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450–461.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2015). Consciousness: Here, There and Everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tschacher, W., & Haken, H. (2007). Intentionality in Non-Equilibrium Systems? The Functional Aspects of Self-Organized Pattern Formation. New Ideas in Psychology, 25(1), 1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEWIDEAPSYCH.2006.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History, Philosophy, and Religious StudiesNazarbayev UniversityNur-Sultan cityKazakhstan
  2. 2.The Amirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations