Advertisement

A Personal Activity Recognition System Based on Smart Devices

Conference paper
  • 643 Downloads
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1052)

Abstract

With the continuous evolution of technology, mobile devices are becoming more and more important in people’s lives. In the same way, new needs related to the information provided by their users arise, making evident the need to develop systems that take advantage of their daily use. The recognition of personal activity based on the information provided by the last generation mobile devices can easily be considered as an useful tool for many purposes and future applications. This paper presents the use of information provided from two smart devices in different acquisition schemes, assessing conventional supervised classifiers to recognize personal activity by an identification of seven classes. The classifiers were trained with a generated database from eight users and were evaluated in offline mode with other two generated databases. The prediction experiments were qualified by using F1-score indicator and were compared with the native prediction from the cellphone. The obtained results presented a maximum F1-score of 100% for the first validation test and 80.7% for the second validation test.

Keywords

Activity recognition Machine learning Wearable devices Cell phone data Myo armband 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is being developed with the support of the Universidad de Ibagué. The results presented in this paper has been obtained with the assistance of students from the Research Hotbed on Artificial Intelligence (SI2C), Research Group D+TEC, Universidad de Ibagué, Ibagué-Colombia.

References

  1. 1.
    Muhammad Arshad Awan, S.-D.K., Guangbin, Z., Kim, C.-G.: Human activity recognition in WSN: a comparative study. Int. J. Netw. Distrib. Comput. 2(4), 10 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lara, O.D., Labrador, M.A.: A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 15(3), 1192–1209 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    He, Y., Li, Y., Bao, S.D.: Fall detection by built-in tri-accelerometer of smartphone. In: Proceedings of the IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics, pp. 184–187. IEEE, January 2012Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dai, J., Teng, J., Bai, X., Shen, Z., Xuan, D.: Mobile phone based drunk driving detection. In: Proceedings of the 4th International ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson, D.A., Trivedi, M.M.: Driving style recognition using a smartphone as a sensor platform. In: 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1609–1615. IEEE, October 2011Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee, Y.-S., Cho, S.-B.: Activity recognition using hierarchical hidden Markov models on a smartphone with 3D accelerometer. In: Corchado, E., Kurzyński, M., Woźniak, M. (eds.) HAIS 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6678, pp. 460–467. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21219-2_58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kwapisz, J.R., Weiss, G.M., Moore, S.A.: Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 12, 74 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Song, S., Jang, J., Park, S.: A phone for human activity recognition using triaxial acceleration sensor. In: 2008 Digest of Technical Papers-International Conference on Consumer Electronics, pp. 1–2. IEEE, January 2008Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sakoe, H., Chiba, S.: Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoust. 26, 43–49 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laput, G., Xiao, R., Harrison, C.: ViBand. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology - UIST 2016, pp. 321–333. ACM Press, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maurer, U., Smailagic, A., Siewiorek, D., Deisher, M.: Activity recognition and monitoring using multiple sensors on different body positions. In: International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Network Systems, pp. 113–116. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mazilu, S., et al.: Online detection of freezing of gait with smartphones and machine learning techniques. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Forero, M.G., Sroubek, F., Cristóbal, G.: Identification of tuberculosis bacteria based on shape and color. Real-Time Imaging 10, 251–262 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Facultad de IngenieríaUniversidad de IbaguéIbaguéColombia

Personalised recommendations