Abstract
By way of summarizing our account on collective decision procedures, we shall provide a brief exposition of those methods that have been discussed in earlier chapters from the viewpoint of their applicability. The question we seek to answer is: what are the circumstances under which each system works best? Since each system has specific proprieties, it is important to understand them in order to choose a Voting Procedure (VP) to evaluate a decision problem. The framework for choosing a voting procedure can guide the Analysts and Decision-Makers with regard to this issue and therefore it evaluates the impact of VP properties on their own business decision process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There are elimination systems that can be—and often are—implemented through several rounds of voting, e.g. the Finnish and French presidential election. This makes it possible for the voters to change or to work out their preferences gradually upon finding which alternatives are available at each stage. Thereby strategic elements enter the analysis. Since we are primarily interested in the properties of systems as methods of aggregating expressed preferences, we assume that the voters's preferences do not change over time in the balloting process.
- 2.
There are, however, binary systems, notably the Borda count, that can be (although typically aren't) implemented via pairwise comparisons which do not always result in an eventual Condorcet winner. In these, the notion of pairwise winning is not the sole determinant of the winner. These systems are not discussed in the present section.
References
Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis. Kluwer academic Publishers.
de Almeida, A. T. (2013). Processo de Decisão nas Organizações: Construindo Modelos de Decisão Multicritério (Decision Process in Organizaions: Building Multicriteria Decision Models). São Paulo: Editora Atlas.
de Almeida, A. T., Cavalcante, C. A. V., Alencar, M. H., Ferreira, R. J. P., Almeida-Filho, A. T., & Garcez T. V. (2015) Multicriteria and multiobjective models for risk, reliability and maintenance decision analysis. In International series in operations research and management science. New York: Springer.
Felsenthal, D., & Nurmi, H. (2017). Monotonicity failures afflicting procedures for electing a single candidate. Cham: Springer.
Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (Eds.). (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Berlin: Springer.
Munda, G. (2008). Social multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable economy. Berlin: Springer.
Nurmi, H. (1983). Voting procedures: A summary analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 13, 181–208.
Pardalos, P. M, Siskos, Y., & Zopounidis, C. (Eds.) (1995). Advances in multicriteria analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Polmerol, J. C., Barba-Romero, S. (2000). Multicriteria decision in management: Principles and practice. Kluwer.
Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. US: Springer.
Roy, B., & Słowinski, R. (2013). Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 1, 69–97.
Saari, D. G. (2001). Chaotic elections! A mathematician looks at voting. Providence: American Mathematical Society.
Vincke, P. (1992). Multicriteria decision-aid. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Almeida, A.T., Morais, D.C., Nurmi, H. (2019). When Does a Given Procedure Work Best?. In: Systems, Procedures and Voting Rules in Context . Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30955-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30955-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30954-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30955-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)