Skip to main content

When Does a Given Procedure Work Best?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systems, Procedures and Voting Rules in Context

Abstract

By way of summarizing our account on collective decision procedures, we shall provide a brief exposition of those methods that have been discussed in earlier chapters from the viewpoint of their applicability. The question we seek to answer is: what are the circumstances under which each system works best? Since each system has specific proprieties, it is important to understand them in order to choose a Voting Procedure (VP) to evaluate a decision problem. The framework for choosing a voting procedure can guide the Analysts and Decision-Makers with regard to this issue and therefore it evaluates the impact of VP properties on their own business decision process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There are elimination systems that can be—and often are—implemented through several rounds of voting, e.g. the Finnish and French presidential election. This makes it possible for the voters to change or to work out their preferences gradually upon finding which alternatives are available at each stage. Thereby strategic elements enter the analysis. Since we are primarily interested in the properties of systems as methods of aggregating expressed preferences, we assume that the voters's preferences do not change over time in the balloting process.

  2. 2.

    There are, however, binary systems, notably the Borda count, that can be (although typically aren't) implemented via pairwise comparisons which do not always result in an eventual Condorcet winner. In these, the notion of pairwise winning is not the sole determinant of the winner. These systems are not discussed in the present section.

References

  • Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis. Kluwer academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida, A. T. (2013). Processo de Decisão nas Organizações: Construindo Modelos de Decisão Multicritério (Decision Process in Organizaions: Building Multicriteria Decision Models). São Paulo: Editora Atlas.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida, A. T., Cavalcante, C. A. V., Alencar, M. H., Ferreira, R. J. P., Almeida-Filho, A. T., & Garcez T. V. (2015) Multicriteria and multiobjective models for risk, reliability and maintenance decision analysis. In International series in operations research and management science. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenthal, D., & Nurmi, H. (2017). Monotonicity failures afflicting procedures for electing a single candidate. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrgott, M. (Eds.). (2005). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G. (2008). Social multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable economy. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi, H. (1983). Voting procedures: A summary analysis. British Journal of Political Science, 13, 181–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardalos, P. M, Siskos, Y., & Zopounidis, C. (Eds.) (1995). Advances in multicriteria analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polmerol, J. C., Barba-Romero, S. (2000). Multicriteria decision in management: Principles and practice. Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1996). Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. US: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B., & SÅ‚owinski, R. (2013). Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 1, 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saari, D. G. (2001). Chaotic elections! A mathematician looks at voting. Providence: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincke, P. (1992). Multicriteria decision-aid. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adiel Teixeira de Almeida .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

de Almeida, A.T., Morais, D.C., Nurmi, H. (2019). When Does a Given Procedure Work Best?. In: Systems, Procedures and Voting Rules in Context . Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30955-8_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics