Abstract
We present an optimization-based synthesis method for laying out railway signaling components on a given track infrastructure to fulfill capacity specifications. The specifications and the optimization method are designed to be suitable for the scope of signaling construction projects and their associated interlocking systems, but can be adapted to related problems in, e.g., highway, tram, or airport runway designs. The main synthesis algorithm starts from an initial heuristic over-approximation of required signaling components and iterates towards better designs using two main optimization techniques: (1) global simultaneous planning of all operational scenarios using incremental SAT-based optimization to eliminate redundant signaling components, and (2) a derivative-free numerical optimization method using as cost function timing results given by a discrete event simulation engine, applied on all the plans from (1).
Synthesizing all of the signaling layout might not always be appropriate in practice, and partial synthesis from an already valid design is a more practical alternative. In consequence, we focus also on the usefulness of the individual optimization steps: SAT-based planning is used to suggest removal of redundant signaling components, whereas numerical optimization of timing results is used to suggest moving signaling components around on the layout, or adding new components. Such changes are suggested to railway engineers using an interactive tool where they can investigate the consequences of applying the various optimizations.
The first author was partially supported by the project RailCons – Automated Methods and Tools for Ensuring Consistency of Railway Designs, with number 248714 funded by the Norwegian Research Council and Railcomplete AS.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See https://railml.org/.
- 2.
See complete format: https://luteberget.github.io/rollingdocs/usage.html.
- 3.
Usage details of our tool can be found on the project’s web page: https://www.mn.uio.no/ifi/english/research/projects/railcons/index.html#Tools.
- 4.
“OpenTrack: Simulation of railway networks” 2018. http://www.opentrack.ch/.
- 5.
“LUKS: Analysis of lines and junctions” 2018. http://www.via-con.de/development/luks.
References
Abril, M., Barber, F., Ingolotti, L., Salido, M., Tormos, P., Lova, A.: An assessment of railway capacity. Transp. Res. Part E: Logistics Transp. Rev. 44(5), 774–806 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2007.04.001
Basile, D., et al.: On the industrial uptake of formal methods in the railway domain. In: Furia, C.A., Winter, K. (eds.) IFM 2018. LNCS, vol. 11023, pp. 20–29. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98938-9_2
Biere, A., Cimatti, A., Clarke, E.M., Strichman, O., Zhu, Y.: Bounded model checking. Adv. Comput. 58(11), 117–148 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2458(03)58003-2
Biere, A., Heule, M., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.): Handbook of Satisfiability, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 185. IOS Press (2009)
Björk, M.: Successful SAT encoding techniques. J. Sat. Boolean Model. Comput. 7(4), 189–201 (2011). https://satassociation.org/jsat/index.php/jsat/article/view/153/118
Borälv, A., Stålmarck, G.: Formal verification in railways. In: Hinchey, M.G., Bowen, J.P. (eds.) Industrial-Strength Formal Methods in Practice, pp. 329–350. Springer (1999), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0523-7_15
Boulanger, J.L.: CENELEC 50128 and IEC 62279 Standards. Wiley-ISTE, March 2015
Brent, R.P.: Algorithms for Minimization Without Derivatives. Dover Publications, Mineola (2002)
Büker, T., Seybold, B.: Stochastic modelling of delay propagation in large networks. J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag. 2(1–2), 34–50 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2012.10.001
Cimatti, A., et al.: Formal verification and validation of ERTMS industrial railway train spacing system. In: Madhusudan, P., Seshia, S.A. (eds.) CAV 2012. LNCS, vol. 7358, pp. 378–393. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31424-7_29
Dillmann, S., Hähnle, R.: Automated planning of ETCS tracks. In: Collart-Dutilleul, S., Lecomte, T., Romanovsky, A. (eds.) RSSRail 2019. LNCS, vol. 11495, pp. 79–90. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18744-6_5
Fantechi, A.: Twenty-five years of formal methods and railways: what next? In: Counsell, S., Núñez, M. (eds.) SEFM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8368, pp. 167–183. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05032-4_13
Hansen, I.A., Pachl, J.: Railway Timetabling and Operations. Eurailpress (2014)
Harris, T., Ross, F.S.: Fundamentals of a method for evaluating rail net capacities. Technical report, RM-1573, Rand Corporation (1955)
Hartonas-Garmhausen, V., Campos, S.V.A., Cimatti, A., Clarke, E.M., Giunchiglia, F.: Verification of a safety-critical railway interlocking system with real-time constraints. Sci. Comput. Program. 36(1), 53–64 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6423(99)00016-7
Haxthausen, A.E., Peleska, J., Kinder, S.: A formal approach for the construction and verification of railway control systems. Formal Aspects Comput. 23(2), 191–219 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00165-009-0143-6
Hürlimann, D.: Objektorientierte Modellierung von Infrastrukturelementen und Betriebsvorgängen im Eisenbahnwesen. Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich (2002). https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/47957
Kamburjan, E., Hähnle, R., Schön, S.: Formal modeling and analysis of railway operations with active objects. Sci. Comput. Program. 166, 167–193 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2018.07.001
Landex, A.: Methods to estimate railway capacity and passenger delays. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark (DTU) (2008). https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/id(f5578206-74c3-4c94-ba0d-43f7da82bf95).html
Luteberget, B.: Automated Reasoning for Planning Railway Infrastructure. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo (2019)
Luteberget, B., Claessen, K., Johansen, C.: Design-time railway capacity verification using SAT modulo discrete event simulation. In: Bjørner, N., Gurfinkel, A. (eds.) Formal Methods in Computer Aided Design (FMCAD), pp. 1–9. IEEE (2018). https://doi.org/10.23919/FMCAD.2018.8603003
Luteberget, B., Johansen, C.: Efficient verification of railway infrastructure designs against standard regulations. Formal Methods Syst. Des. 52(1), 1–32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10703-017-0281-z
Luteberget, B., Johansen, C., Feyling, C., Steffen, M.: Rule-based incremental verification tools applied to railway designs and regulations. In: Fitzgerald, J., Heitmeyer, C., Gnesi, S., Philippou, A. (eds.) FM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9995, pp. 772–778. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48989-6_49
Luteberget, B., Johansen, C., Steffen, M.: Rule-based consistency checking of railway infrastructure designs. In: Ábrahám, E., Huisman, M. (eds.) IFM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9681, pp. 491–507. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33693-0_31
Mao, B., Liu, J., Ding, Y., Liu, H., Ho, T.K.: Signalling layout for fixed-block railway lines with real-coded genetic algorithms. Hong Kong Inst. Eng. Trans. 13(1), 35–40 (2006). https://eprints.qut.edu.au/38260/
Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J.: Numerical Optimization, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-40065-5
Pachl, J.: Railway Operation and Control. VTD Rail Publishing (2015)
Robinson, S.: Simulation: The Practice of Model Development and Use. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York (2004)
Vu, L.H., Haxthausen, A.E., Peleska, J.: A domain-specific language for railway interlocking systems. In: Schnieder, E., Tarnai, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Formal Methods for Automation and Safety in Railway and Automotive Systems, (FORMS/FORMAT). pp. 200–209. TU Braunschweig (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Luteberget, B., Johansen, C., Steffen, M. (2019). Synthesis of Railway Signaling Layout from Local Capacity Specifications. In: ter Beek, M., McIver, A., Oliveira, J. (eds) Formal Methods – The Next 30 Years. FM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11800. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30942-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30942-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30941-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30942-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)