Skip to main content

Housing Policy Innovation to Integrate Environmental Sustainability with Economic Development

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
INCREaSE 2019 (INCREaSE 2019)

Abstract

In the year 2017, about 89% of the total energy consumed in the US was produced using non-renewable energy sources and about 44% of tenant households were cost burdened. There is currently limited research on holistic approaches to housing policy that integrate housing affordability and environmental considerations. The objective of the current study is to utilize data and empirical analyses to explain green building policy content, adoption, and determinants in the context of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program. We employ 2010–2016 data to test a conceptual model of state innovative capacity and explore the magnitude of associations between state characteristics and the incorporation of green building incentives into the LIHTC program in 50 US states. With a clear focus on savings from increased energy-efficiency, states increasingly adopted green building incentives between 2006–2010 but lost the initial momentum and started to fluctuate since 2010. The magnitude of governments’ financial resources, a holistic approach to green building, and citizens’ liberal ideology are among the strongest correlates of adoption controlling for income and population. To shift toward a sustainable future, policymakers should take a holistic, steady, and evolutionary approach to green building with an emphasis on simultaneous diversification, decentralization, and decarbonization of energy generation and seek complementary policies that raise the cost of carbon-intensive technologies in affordable housing. To facilitate the integration of green building with affordable housing policy, researchers should explore innovations in the policy process and measure the effectiveness of green building policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. US DOE: Use of Energy in the United States (2019). https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=us_energy_use. Accessed 21 Apr 2019

  2. IPCC: Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change, vol. 3. Cambridge University Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P.T., Anderegg, W.R., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E.W., et al.: Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 11(4), 048002 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bang, G.: Energy security and climate change concerns: triggers for energy policy change in the United States? Energy Policy 38(4), 1645–1653 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalafatis, S.: Identifying the potential for climate compatible development efforts and the missing links. Sustainability 9(9), 1642 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pearce, A.R., DuBose, J.R., Bosch, S.J.: Green building policy options for the public sector. J. Green Build. 2(1), 156–174 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao, D., McCoy, A.P., Agee, P., Mo, Y., Reichard, G., Paige, F.: Time effects of green buildings on energy use for low-income households: a longitudinal study in the United States. Sustain. Cities Soc. 1(40), 559–568 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karch, A.: Emerging issues and future directions in state policy diffusion research. State Polit. Policy Q. 7(1), 54–80 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohr, L.B.: Determinants of innovation in organizations. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 63(1), 111–126 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walker, J.L.: The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 63(3), 880–899 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boehmke, F.J., Witmer, R.: Disentangling diffusion: the effects of social learning and economic competition on state policy innovation and expansion. Polit. Res. Q. 57(1), 39–51 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mooney, C.Z.: Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Polit. Res. Q. 54(1), 103–124 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gray, V.: Innovation in the states: a diffusion study. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 67(4), 1174–1185 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Berry, F.S.: Sizing up state policy innovation research. Policy Stud. J. 22(3), 442–456 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Berry, F.S., Berry, W.D.: State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: an event history analysis. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 84(2), 395–415 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Glick, H.R., Hays, S.P.: Innovation and reinvention in state policymaking: theory and the evolution of living will laws. J. Polit. 53(3), 835–850 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Buckley, J., Westerland, C.: Duration dependence, functional form, and corrected standard errors: improving EHA models of state policy diffusion. State Polit. Policy Q. 4(1), 94–113 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yi, H., Feiock, R.C.: Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state renewable portfolio standards. Rev. Policy Res. 29(2), 193–206 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Freeman, C.: Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lesson from Japan. Pinter, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lundvall, B.-A.: National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (London: Pinter). Lundvall B-AA Borrás S1997 Glob Learn Econ Implic Innov Policy TSER Programme DG XII Comm Eur Union MacKenzie Podsakoff P2012 Common Method Bias Mark Causes Mech Proced Remedies. J. Retail. 88(4), 542–555 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nelson, R.R.: National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Edquist, C.: Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges. Afr. J. Sci. Technol. Innov. Dev. 2(3), 14–45 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. USGBC: An Introduction to LEED and Green Building. US Green Building Council (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chegut, A., Eichholtz, P., Kok, N.: Supply, demand and the value of green buildings. Urban Stud. 51(1), 22–43 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. HUD: Glossary of HUD Terms [Internet] (2019). https://www.huduser.gov/portal/glossary/glossary_a.html. Accessed 6 Feb 2019

  26. Bradshaw, W., Connelly, E.F., Cook, M.F., Goldstein, J., Pauly, J.: The costs and benefits of green affordable housing. New Ecology, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. James, P.: Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. Routledge, London (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Furman, J.L., Porter, M.E., Stern, S.: The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res. Policy 31(6), 899–933 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yeganeh, A.J., Hall, R., Pearce, A., Hankey, S.: A social equity analysis of the U.S. public transportation system based on job accessibility. J. Transp. Land Use, 11(1) (2018). https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/1370

  30. Deyle, R.E., Meo, M., James, T.E.: State policy innovation and climate change: a coastal erosion analog. Glob. Clim. Change Public Policy, 39–66 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bushnell, J., Peterman, C., Wolfram, C.: Local solutions to global problems: policy choice and regulatory jurisdiction. National Bureau of Economic Research (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kay, A.: A critique of the use of path dependency in policy studies. Public Adm. 83(3), 553–571 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Carley, S.: The era of state energy policy innovation: a review of policy instruments. Rev. Policy Res. 28(3), 265–294 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kahn, M.E., Morris, E.A.: Walking the walk: the association between community environmentalism and green travel behavior. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 75(4), 389–405 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yeganeh, A.J., McCoy, A.P., Schenk, T.: Determinants of climate change policy adoption: a meta-analysis. Work Manuscr. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hearn, J.C., Griswold, C.P.: State-level centralization and policy innovation in US postsecondary education. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 16(2), 161–190 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Berry, W.D., Ringquist, E.J., Fording, R.C., Hanson, R.L.: Measuring citizen and government ideology in the american states, 1960–93. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 42(1), 327–348 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gujarati, D.N.: Basic Econometrics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rogers, E.M: Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Global Green: QAP Reports—Global Green [Internet] (2019). https://www.globalgreen.org/blog/m8fd4swjex4cj28xp7rxtahjt5zbg4. Accessed 13 May 2019

  41. Krause, R.M.: Political decision-making and the local provision of public goods: the case of municipal climate protection in the US. Urban Stud. 49(11), 2399–2417 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kato, J.: Regressive Taxation and the welfare State: Path Dependence and Policy Diffusion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. Krause, R.M.: Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by US cities. J. Urban Aff. 33(1), 45–60 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Krause, R.M.: Symbolic or substantive policy? Measuring the extent of local commitment to climate protection. Environ. Plan C Gov. Policy 29(1), 46–62 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armin Jeddi Yeganeh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yeganeh, A.J., McCoy, A.P. (2020). Housing Policy Innovation to Integrate Environmental Sustainability with Economic Development. In: Monteiro, J., et al. INCREaSE 2019. INCREaSE 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30938-1_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30938-1_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30937-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30938-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics