Abstract
In the year 2017, about 89% of the total energy consumed in the US was produced using non-renewable energy sources and about 44% of tenant households were cost burdened. There is currently limited research on holistic approaches to housing policy that integrate housing affordability and environmental considerations. The objective of the current study is to utilize data and empirical analyses to explain green building policy content, adoption, and determinants in the context of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program. We employ 2010–2016 data to test a conceptual model of state innovative capacity and explore the magnitude of associations between state characteristics and the incorporation of green building incentives into the LIHTC program in 50 US states. With a clear focus on savings from increased energy-efficiency, states increasingly adopted green building incentives between 2006–2010 but lost the initial momentum and started to fluctuate since 2010. The magnitude of governments’ financial resources, a holistic approach to green building, and citizens’ liberal ideology are among the strongest correlates of adoption controlling for income and population. To shift toward a sustainable future, policymakers should take a holistic, steady, and evolutionary approach to green building with an emphasis on simultaneous diversification, decentralization, and decarbonization of energy generation and seek complementary policies that raise the cost of carbon-intensive technologies in affordable housing. To facilitate the integration of green building with affordable housing policy, researchers should explore innovations in the policy process and measure the effectiveness of green building policies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
US DOE: Use of Energy in the United States (2019). https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.php?page=us_energy_use. Accessed 21 Apr 2019
IPCC: Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change, vol. 3. Cambridge University Press (2015)
Cook, J., Oreskes, N., Doran, P.T., Anderegg, W.R., Verheggen, B., Maibach, E.W., et al.: Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 11(4), 048002 (2016)
Bang, G.: Energy security and climate change concerns: triggers for energy policy change in the United States? Energy Policy 38(4), 1645–1653 (2010)
Kalafatis, S.: Identifying the potential for climate compatible development efforts and the missing links. Sustainability 9(9), 1642 (2017)
Pearce, A.R., DuBose, J.R., Bosch, S.J.: Green building policy options for the public sector. J. Green Build. 2(1), 156–174 (2007)
Zhao, D., McCoy, A.P., Agee, P., Mo, Y., Reichard, G., Paige, F.: Time effects of green buildings on energy use for low-income households: a longitudinal study in the United States. Sustain. Cities Soc. 1(40), 559–568 (2018)
Karch, A.: Emerging issues and future directions in state policy diffusion research. State Polit. Policy Q. 7(1), 54–80 (2007)
Mohr, L.B.: Determinants of innovation in organizations. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 63(1), 111–126 (1969)
Walker, J.L.: The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 63(3), 880–899 (1969)
Boehmke, F.J., Witmer, R.: Disentangling diffusion: the effects of social learning and economic competition on state policy innovation and expansion. Polit. Res. Q. 57(1), 39–51 (2004)
Mooney, C.Z.: Modeling regional effects on state policy diffusion. Polit. Res. Q. 54(1), 103–124 (2001)
Gray, V.: Innovation in the states: a diffusion study. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 67(4), 1174–1185 (1973)
Berry, F.S.: Sizing up state policy innovation research. Policy Stud. J. 22(3), 442–456 (1994)
Berry, F.S., Berry, W.D.: State lottery adoptions as policy innovations: an event history analysis. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 84(2), 395–415 (1990)
Glick, H.R., Hays, S.P.: Innovation and reinvention in state policymaking: theory and the evolution of living will laws. J. Polit. 53(3), 835–850 (1991)
Buckley, J., Westerland, C.: Duration dependence, functional form, and corrected standard errors: improving EHA models of state policy diffusion. State Polit. Policy Q. 4(1), 94–113 (2004)
Yi, H., Feiock, R.C.: Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state renewable portfolio standards. Rev. Policy Res. 29(2), 193–206 (2012)
Freeman, C.: Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lesson from Japan. Pinter, London (1987)
Lundvall, B.-A.: National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning (London: Pinter). Lundvall B-AA Borrás S1997 Glob Learn Econ Implic Innov Policy TSER Programme DG XII Comm Eur Union MacKenzie Podsakoff P2012 Common Method Bias Mark Causes Mech Proced Remedies. J. Retail. 88(4), 542–555 (1992)
Nelson, R.R.: National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1993)
Edquist, C.: Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges. Afr. J. Sci. Technol. Innov. Dev. 2(3), 14–45 (2010)
USGBC: An Introduction to LEED and Green Building. US Green Building Council (2019)
Chegut, A., Eichholtz, P., Kok, N.: Supply, demand and the value of green buildings. Urban Stud. 51(1), 22–43 (2014)
HUD: Glossary of HUD Terms [Internet] (2019). https://www.huduser.gov/portal/glossary/glossary_a.html. Accessed 6 Feb 2019
Bradshaw, W., Connelly, E.F., Cook, M.F., Goldstein, J., Pauly, J.: The costs and benefits of green affordable housing. New Ecology, Cambridge (2005)
James, P.: Urban Sustainability in Theory and Practice: Circles of Sustainability. Routledge, London (2014)
Furman, J.L., Porter, M.E., Stern, S.: The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res. Policy 31(6), 899–933 (2002)
Yeganeh, A.J., Hall, R., Pearce, A., Hankey, S.: A social equity analysis of the U.S. public transportation system based on job accessibility. J. Transp. Land Use, 11(1) (2018). https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/1370
Deyle, R.E., Meo, M., James, T.E.: State policy innovation and climate change: a coastal erosion analog. Glob. Clim. Change Public Policy, 39–66 (1994)
Bushnell, J., Peterman, C., Wolfram, C.: Local solutions to global problems: policy choice and regulatory jurisdiction. National Bureau of Economic Research (2007)
Kay, A.: A critique of the use of path dependency in policy studies. Public Adm. 83(3), 553–571 (2005)
Carley, S.: The era of state energy policy innovation: a review of policy instruments. Rev. Policy Res. 28(3), 265–294 (2011)
Kahn, M.E., Morris, E.A.: Walking the walk: the association between community environmentalism and green travel behavior. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 75(4), 389–405 (2009)
Yeganeh, A.J., McCoy, A.P., Schenk, T.: Determinants of climate change policy adoption: a meta-analysis. Work Manuscr. (2019)
Hearn, J.C., Griswold, C.P.: State-level centralization and policy innovation in US postsecondary education. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 16(2), 161–190 (1994)
Berry, W.D., Ringquist, E.J., Fording, R.C., Hanson, R.L.: Measuring citizen and government ideology in the american states, 1960–93. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 42(1), 327–348 (1998)
Gujarati, D.N.: Basic Econometrics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, London (2009)
Rogers, E.M: Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster (2010)
Global Green: QAP Reports—Global Green [Internet] (2019). https://www.globalgreen.org/blog/m8fd4swjex4cj28xp7rxtahjt5zbg4. Accessed 13 May 2019
Krause, R.M.: Political decision-making and the local provision of public goods: the case of municipal climate protection in the US. Urban Stud. 49(11), 2399–2417 (2012)
Kato, J.: Regressive Taxation and the welfare State: Path Dependence and Policy Diffusion. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Krause, R.M.: Policy innovation, intergovernmental relations, and the adoption of climate protection initiatives by US cities. J. Urban Aff. 33(1), 45–60 (2011)
Krause, R.M.: Symbolic or substantive policy? Measuring the extent of local commitment to climate protection. Environ. Plan C Gov. Policy 29(1), 46–62 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yeganeh, A.J., McCoy, A.P. (2020). Housing Policy Innovation to Integrate Environmental Sustainability with Economic Development. In: Monteiro, J., et al. INCREaSE 2019. INCREaSE 2019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30938-1_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30938-1_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30937-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30938-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)