Abstract
This chapter traces the history of feedback theory, beginning with the view that feedback is an organizational resource provided to an employee. In this conceptualization feedback is viewed as an event, and subsequent research and theory, focused on antecedents and outcomes of the feedback event. A second set of theories views feedback as an individual resource that employees are motivated to obtain. These theories focus on the process of feedback-seeking. The final, newer theories emphasize the importance of contextual factors associated with interpersonal relationships and the environment, and view feedback as a process rather than an event. We believe that to be useful in practice, theories of feedback should address the underlying process and factors that impact that process and provide insight into how to be more intentional when giving, receiving, and using feedback. The remaining chapters in this book contribute to feedback theory and practice by discussing current thinking with respect to different aspects of the feedback process and providing concrete recommendations for future research, as well as intentional practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., et al. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9(2), 219–252.
Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32(3), 370–398.
Bretz Jr., R. D., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18(2), 321–352.
Ilgen, D. R., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & McKellin, D. B. (1993). Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54(3), 321–368.
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254.
Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30(6), 881–905.
London, M. (2003). Job feedback: Giving, seeking and using feedback for performance improvement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
London, M., & Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), 81–100.
Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Sage.
Murphy, K. R., Cleveland, J. N., & Hanscom, M. E. (2018). Performance appraisal and management. Sage.
Taylor, M. S., Fisher, C. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1984). Individual’s reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective. In Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 81–124). JAI Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steelman, L.A., Williams, J.R. (2019). Using Science to Improve Feedback Processes at Work. In: Steelman, L.A., Williams, J.R. (eds) Feedback at Work. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30915-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30915-2_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30914-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30915-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)