Skip to main content

Using Science to Improve Feedback Processes at Work

  • Chapter
Feedback at Work

Abstract

This chapter traces the history of feedback theory, beginning with the view that feedback is an organizational resource provided to an employee. In this conceptualization feedback is viewed as an event, and subsequent research and theory, focused on antecedents and outcomes of the feedback event. A second set of theories views feedback as an individual resource that employees are motivated to obtain. These theories focus on the process of feedback-seeking. The final, newer theories emphasize the importance of contextual factors associated with interpersonal relationships and the environment, and view feedback as a process rather than an event. We believe that to be useful in practice, theories of feedback should address the underlying process and factors that impact that process and provide insight into how to be more intentional when giving, receiving, and using feedback. The remaining chapters in this book contribute to feedback theory and practice by discussing current thinking with respect to different aspects of the feedback process and providing concrete recommendations for future research, as well as intentional practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, S., Campion, M., Colquitt, A., Grubb, A., Murphy, K., Ollander-Krane, R., et al. (2016). Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9(2), 219–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, S. J., & Cummings, L. L. (1983). Feedback as an individual resource: Personal strategies of creating information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 32(3), 370–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretz Jr., R. D., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of Management, 18(2), 321–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D. R., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & McKellin, D. B. (1993). Performance appraisal process research in the 1980s: What has it contributed to appraisals in use? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54(3), 321–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30(6), 881–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, M. (2003). Job feedback: Giving, seeking and using feedback for performance improvement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • London, M., & Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. R., Cleveland, J. N., & Hanscom, M. E. (2018). Performance appraisal and management. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. S., Fisher, C. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1984). Individual’s reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective. In Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 81–124). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa A. Steelman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steelman, L.A., Williams, J.R. (2019). Using Science to Improve Feedback Processes at Work. In: Steelman, L.A., Williams, J.R. (eds) Feedback at Work. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30915-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics