Abstract
In service industries where mass operations along with mass customization are demanding, they are keen in minimizing all factors such as total process time, waiting time, and movement time for a cost-effective environment and customer satisfaction. In such situations, maintaining customers to a satisfied level, optimal due date plays a vital role. Also the customers may not be ready in waiting for more than just in time. Keeping all these in mind a model is proposed to find out optimal batch size and corresponding makespan that satisfies required due date(s) for all possible clients of municipal services, such as patients of hospitals. A simple heuristics-based algorithm for mass customization is developed that finds the near-optimal solution for different categories of patients. The search algorithm offers better results which show that the model is effective in such given conditions. The results show that the proposed method performs well in such type of problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Davis, S. M. (1987). Future perfect. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Phanindra Kumar Chadalavada University of Kentucky Master's Theses Graduate School. (2006). Minimum flow time schedule genetic algorithm for mass customization manufacturing using minicells.
Zhang, Z., Wenming, C., Lin, S. & Qingliang, Y. (2009). An ant based algorithm for balancing assembly lines in a mass customization environment IEEE 1–4.
Noorul, H. A., Jayaprakash, J., & Rengarajan, K. (2006). A hybrid genetic algorithm approach to mixed-model assembly line balancing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28, 337–341.
Boysen, N., Scholl, A., & Wopperer, N. (2012). Resequencing of mixed-model assembly lines: Survey and research agenda. European Journal of Operational Research, 216, 594–604.
Rahimi-Vahed, A. R., Rabbani, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Torabi, S. A., & Jolai, F. (2007). A multi-objective scatter search for a mixed-model assembly line sequencing problem. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 21, 85–99.
Modrak, V., & Marton, D. (2012). Modelling and complexity assessment of assembly supply chain systems. Procedia Engineering, 48, 428–435.
Modrak, V., & Marton, D. (2014). Configuration complexity assessment of convergent supply chain systems. International Journal of General Systems, 43(5), 508–520.
Franz, C., Hällgren, E. C., & Koberstein, A. (2014). Resequencing orders on mixed-model assembly lines: Heuristic approaches to minimise the number of overload situations. International Journal of Production Research, 52(19), 5823–5840.
Gujjula, R. & Günther, H.O. (2009). Resequencing mixed-model assembly lines under just in-sequence constraints. In: International conference on computers and industrial engineering (CIE 2009). IEEE; (pp. 668–73).
Valero-Herrero, M., Garcia-Sabater, J. P., Vidal-Carreras, P. I., & Canos-Daros, L. (2014). Solving the car resequencing problem with mix banks. Dirección y Organización, 54, 36–44.
Gaia, N., Pacciarelli, D., & Pacifici, A. (2002). Optimally balancing assembly lines with different workstations. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 118, 99–113.
Taube, F., & Minner, S. (2018). Resequencing mixed-model assembly lines with restoration to customer orders. Omega, 78, 99–111.
Merengo, C., Nava, F., & Pozetti, A. (1999). Balancing and sequencing manual mixed-model assembly lines. International Journal of Production Research, 37, 2835–2860.
Bukchin, J., & Rubinovitz, J. (2002). A weighted approach for assembly line design with station paralleling and equipment selection. IIE Transactions, 35, 573–585.
Burns, L. D., & Daganzo, C. F. (1987). Assembly line job sequencing principles. International Journal of Production Research, 25, 71–99.
Blackstone, J. H., Phillips, D. T., & Hogg, G. L. (1982). A state-of-the-art survey of dispatching rules for manufacturing job shop operations. International Journal of Production Research, 20, 27–45.
Mane, J. K., & Ghadle, K. P. (2012). Common due-date assignment and job scheduling on single machine and parallel machines. In The bulletin of Society for Mathematical Services and Standards. Online: 2012-03-01 ISSN: 2277-8020 (Vol. 1, pp. 6–13).
Baker, K. R., & Bertrand, J. W. M. (1980). A comparison of due-date selection rules, industrial engr. Report 1980/02. Eindhoven: University of Technology.
Kim, Y. K., Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. J. (2000a). Two-sided assembly line balancing: A genetic algorithm approach. Production Planning & Control, 11, 44–53.
Castillo, F., & Gazmuri, P. (2015). Genetic algorithms for batch sizing and production scheduling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 77, 261–280.
Modrak, V., & Pandian, R. S. (2010). Flow shop scheduling algorithm to minimize completion time for n-jobs m-machines problem. Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette, 17(3), 273–278.
Semanco, P., & Modrak, V. (2012). A comparison of constructive heuristics with the objective of minimizing makespan in the flow-shop scheduling problem. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 9.5, 177–190.
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic-VEGA under the grant No. 1/0419/16.
This publication is the partial result of the project that received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement number 734713.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sudhakara Pandian, R., Modrak, V., Soltysova, Z., Semanco, P. (2020). Scheduling Heuristic to Satisfy Due Dates of the Customer Orders in Mass Customized Service Industry. In: Cagáňová, D., Horňáková, N. (eds) Mobility Internet of Things 2018. Mobility IoT 2018. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30911-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30911-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30910-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30911-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)