Skip to main content

Enhancing Resilience by Understanding Smart City and Safe City Concepts and Their Common Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mobility Internet of Things 2018 (Mobility IoT 2018)

Abstract

Nowadays, in many cities and in their development strategies we can see smart approaches implemented in order to transform cities into so-called smart cities. Our research implies less focus given to the field of safety, but still many of these municipalities implement solutions of a safe city concept as well. To reach resilience, however, it is needed to understand the city as a complex environment, with their smart and safe concepts as interconnected parts. This chapter deals with interconnected smart city and safe city concepts and their common systems are introduced. Smart and safe layers of the systems are defined and features, needed in every system, are further summarised. Definitions, describing both concepts and each of the system, are presented. Those are based on a number of studied and compared works, dealing with respective systems from various points of view, our own experiences and communication with executives, responsible for smart development of Tampere city. After summarising the big picture of this topic, it is concluded that for its complex understanding, the structure for concepts and their systems needs to be presented. Thus, such a structure was set up and is described in the second section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blomqvist, T. (2018). Smart Tampere (p. 15). Tampere: Studio Libeskind.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smart Tampere Ecosystem. Retrieved May 7, 2018, from http://smarttampere.fi/en

  3. Helsinki Smart Region. Retrieved May 15, 2018, from https://www.helsinkismart.fi/

  4. Haapakangas, V. (2018). Concepts Smart City, Safe City and cybernetic security. Tampere: Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lacinák, M., & Ristvej, J. (2017). Smart City, Safety and Security, In: 12th International Scientific Conference of Young Scientists on Sustainable, Modern and Safe Transport, TRANSCOM 2017. Procedia Engineering, 192, 522–527., ISSN: 1877-7058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Axis Communications. (2015). A smart city is a city, where people feel safe. Brožúra: Axis Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huawei: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (2013). Huawei smart city solution. Brožúra: Huawei Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fedorov, V., Ana, R., & Terekhov, A. (2012). "Safe City"– an Open and Reliable Solution for a Safe and Smart City. In: ZAO IskraUralTEL. Ekaterinburg. 6s., zo dňa 15.3.2018, dostupné na internete. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fff6/d861abe7dc3d022c5e7b1d4f25d87d2850e8.pdf

  9. Finka, M., Ondrejička, V., & Jamečný, Ľ. (2016). Urban safety as spatial quality in smart cities. Bratislava: Slovenská technická univerzita.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Giffinger, R., Fertner, Ch., Kramar, H., Pichler-Milanovic, N. & Meijers, E. Europeansmartcities 3.0 (2014) - Ranking. Retrieved May 12, 2018, from http://www.smart-cities.eu/?cid=3&ver=3

  11. The Worldwatch Institute. (2016). Can a city be sustainable? (state of the world) (p. 448). Washington, DC: Island press,. ISBN 13: 978-1-61091-755-1, ISBN 10: 1-61091-755-3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Benevolo, C., Dameri, R. P., & D’Auria, B. (2015). Smart mobility in smart city. In T. Torre et al. (Eds.), Empowering organizations, lecture notes in information systems and organisation (Vol. 11, pp. 13–28). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23784-8_2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Çiğdem, Ç. (2016). The key role of the smart traffic applications in smart city systems, International Conference on Advances in Science ICAS, Istanbul, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24617.39527.

  14. Docherty, I., Marsden, G., & Anable, J. (2018). The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A. in press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mrityunjaya, D.H., Naveen, K., Laxmikant, S.A. & Kelagadi, H.M. (2017). Smart Transportation, International Conference ON I-SMAC 2017 (IOT in Social, Mobile, Analytics and Cloud) (I-SMAC), IEEE, ISBN 978-1-5090-3243-3.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhili, L., Xudong, J., & Wen, C. (2012). Solving the last mile problem: Ensure the success of public bicycle system in Beijing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 43, 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hadden, D. What is the Smart in Smart Government. Retrieved October 25, 2018, from http://freebalance.com/open-government/what-is-the-smart-in-smart-government/

  18. Lunde, K. Nordic Smart Government. Retrieved October 25, 2018, from https://nordicsmartgovernment.org/

  19. Mutiara, D., Yuniarti, S., & Pratama, B. (2018). Smart governance for smart city, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental. Science, 126, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smart Tampere: Smart Government & Citizen. Retrieved October 25, 2018, from http://smarttampere.fi/en/smart-ecosystem-themes/smart-government-and-citizen

  21. NEC: Smart Government. Retrieved October 25, 2018, from https://www.nec-enterprise.com/solutions/Smart-Government-229

  22. Rochet, C. (2015). Urban lifecycle management: A research program for smart government of smart cities (p. 33). Marseille: Institut de management Public et Gouvernance Territoriale.

    Google Scholar 

  23. ByeongGuk, K. Daily edventures. Retrieved April 23, 2018, from http://dailyedventures.com/index.php/2013/03/11/korea/

  24. Capdevila, I., & Zarlenga, M. I. (2015). Smart City or smart citizens? The Barcelona case. Journal of Strategy and Management, 8(3), 266–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2017). Being a 'citizen' in the smart city: Up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation (p. 24). Maynooth: The Programmable City Working Paper 30.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bull, R. (2016). Smart citizens for smart cities: Participating in the future. Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers – Energy, 169(3), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhi-Ting, Z., Ming-Hua, Y. & Riezebos, P. A research framework of smart education, Smart Learning Environments. Retrieved October 26, 2018, from https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2

  28. Kresin, F. (2016). Smart cities value their smart citizens. In V. Mamadouh & A. Wageningen (Eds.), Urban Europe. Fifty Tales of the City, chapter: 22 (p. 6). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_623610.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Smart Tampere: Smart Industry. Retrieved October 26, 2018, from http://smarttampere.fi/en/smart-ecosystem-themes/smart-industry

  30. Investopedia, Sharing Economy. Retrieved October 26, 2018, from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sharing-economy.asp#ixzz5IJNu1iSI

  31. Kumar, T.M.V. & Dahiya, B. (2017). Smart economy in smart cities, In: Smart Cities, Local Community and Socio-economic Development: The Case of Bologna, 1st ed, Chapter 1, (pp. 3–76).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Christiansen, H. Ch. & Kongsmark, E. Defining a Smart Energy City. Retrieved October 26, 2018, from http://urbantransform.eu/about/smart-energy-city/

  33. Tokody, D. Schuster, G. and Papp, J. (2015). Smart City, Smart Infrastructure, Smart Railway, International Conference on Applied Internet and Information Technologies: ICAIIT 2015, At Zrenjanin, Serbia, (pp. 231–234).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meier, M. Smart Energy: What is the Risk? Retrieved October 26, 2018, from http://www.remotemagazine.com/main/articles/smart-energy-what-is-the-risk/

  35. Lund, H., Østergaard, P. A., Connolly, D. & Mathiesen, B. V. Smart energy and smart energy systems. Retrieved October 26, 2018, from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cormia, R.D. Getting Smart About Smart Energy. Retrieved October 26, 2018, from https://www.slideshare.net/rdcormia/getting-smart-about-smart-energy

  37. IGI Global: What is Smart Environment. Retrieved October 26, 2018, from https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/smart-environment/27178

  38. SlideShare: Smart environment. Retrieved October 26, 2018, from https://www.slideshare.net/franson0605/smart-environment

  39. Tóth, A. (2017). Green infrastructure - its elements, areas and systems. Enviro Magazine, 22(3), 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mikulecký, P. (2012). Smart Environments for Smart Learning, DIVAI 2012 - 9th International Scientific Conference on Distance Learning in Applied Informatics, Štúrovo, ISBN 978–80–558-0092-9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lovecek, T., et al. (2016). Level of protection of critical infrastructure in the Slovak Republic, In: Conference: International Conference on Engineering Science and Production Management (ESPM), (pp. 163–168).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Nosek, R., et al. (2017). Analysis of paper sludge pellets for energy utilization. BioResources, 12(4), 7032–7040.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Holubčík, M., et al. (2012). Optimization of the production process of wood pellets by adding additives. International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering, 1(2), 20–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Holubčík, M., et al. (2015). Factors affecting emission concentrations in small heat sources. Communications - Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, 17(3), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Blomqvist, T. (2018). Process of finding and implementation of a Smart City solutions in Tampere: personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Slebodník, Ľ. (2019). Process of finding and implementation of a Smart City solutions in Žilina: personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zánická Hollá, K., Šimák, L., & Ristvej, J. (2010). Systematic method of risk assessment in industrial processes. In Risk analysis VII: Simulation and hazard mitigation (p. 43). Southampton: WIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2495/RISK100111. ISBN 9781845644727. ISSN 1743-3517.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Jánošíková, G., Hudecová D. (2013). Methodology of Assessment of Selected Risks on a National Level, Ministry of Interior of Slovak Republic, (p. 30).

    Google Scholar 

  49. The Economist - Intelligence Unit: Safe Cities Index 2017. Retrieved January 8, 2019, from https://dkf1ato8y5dsg.cloudfront.net/uploads/5/82/safe-cities-index-eng-web.pdf

  50. Centre for International Statistics at the Canadian Council on Social Development: Personal Security Index. (1998). CSLS Conference on the State of Living Standards and the Quality of Life in Canada. 19 p. In: M. Kováč (Ed.), Possibilities of Measuring of Safety of the Citizens in the Conditions of Regions of Slovak Republic, Dissertation thesis, Faculty of Security engineering, University of Žilina, pp. 126. Retrieved January 8, 2019, from http://opac.crzp.sk/?fn=docviewChild000D4083

  51. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). Better life index. Better life index. Accessed 8 Jan 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kováč, M. Possibilities of measuring of safety of the citizens in the conditions of regions of Slovak Republic, dissertation thesis (p. 126). Žilina: Faculty of Security engineering, University of Žilina. Retrieved January 8, 2019, from http://opac.crzp.sk/?fn=docviewChild000D4083.

Download references

Acknowledgments

“With the support of the project VEGA 1/0628/18 Minimizing the level of experts’ estimations subjectivity in safety practice using quantitative and qualitative methods”.

“This work was supported by the research project VI20152019049 “RESILIENCE 2015: Dynamic Resilience Evaluation of Interrelated Critical Infrastructure Subsystems”, supported by the Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic in the years 2015-2019”.

“This work was jointly supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. SK-CN-2017-0023”.

“This work was supported by the Internal Grant Scheme of Faculty of Security Engineering, University of Žilina from the grant No. IGP201805”.

The views expressed, however, are solely those of the authors and not necessarily those of the institutions with which they are affiliated or of their funding sources. The authors are solely responsible for any errors or omissions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jozef Ristvej .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ristvej, J., Lacinák, M. (2020). Enhancing Resilience by Understanding Smart City and Safe City Concepts and Their Common Systems. In: Cagáňová, D., Horňáková, N. (eds) Mobility Internet of Things 2018. Mobility IoT 2018. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30911-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30911-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30910-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30911-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics