Advertisement

Phonetic Variation in Cat–Human Communication

  • Susanne SchötzEmail author
Chapter
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

In this chapter, the phonetic variation of the vocal communication between domestic cats and humans is summarised and described, based on previous research as well as more recent studies and observations. Emphasis lies on classifying and describing the different vocalisation types of the cat using phonetic methods and terminology. The articulation, phonetic transcription and acoustic patterns of the most common vocalisation types are described. In addition, the segments (vowel and consonants), the prosody (the tone, intonation, rhythm and dynamics) of cat sounds as well as human perception of cat vocalisations is summarised.

Keywords

Cat–human communication Cat vocalisations Phonetic description and transcription of cat sounds 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges the Marcus and Amalia Wallenberg Foundation and Lund University Humanities Lab. The cat vocalisation categories described here are accompanied by video and audio examples that can be found on the project website meowsic.se under cat sounds.

References

  1. Beetz AM (2017) Theories and possible processes of action in animal assisted interventions. Appl Dev Sci 21:139–149.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1262263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradshaw J (2013) Cat sense: the feline enigma revealed. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradshaw J, Cameron-Beaumont C (2000) The signalling repertoire of the domestic cat and its undomesticated relatives. In: Turner DC, Bateson P (eds) The domestic cat: the biology of its behaviour. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown KA, Buchwald JS, Johnson JR, Mikolich DJ (1978) Vocalization in the cat and kitten. Dev Psychobiol 11:559–570.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.420110605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnham D, Francis E, Vollmer-Conna U et al (1998) Are you my little pussy-cat? Acoustic, phonetic and affective qualities of infant- and pet-directed speech. In: 5th international conference on spoken language processing 30th November – 4th December, 1998 Sydney, Australia, ISCAGoogle Scholar
  6. Crowell-Davis SL, Curtis TM, Knowles RJ (2004) Social organization in the cat: a modern un-derstanding. J Feline Med Surg 6:19–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfms.2003.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eklund R, Peters G, Weise F, Munro F (2012a) An acoustic analysis of agonistic sounds in wild cheetahs. In: Proceedings of Fonetik 2012, Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, University of Gothenburg, pp 37–40Google Scholar
  8. Eklund R, Peters G, Weise F, Munro S (2012b) A comparative acoustic analysis of purring in four cheetahs. Proceedings of Fonetik 2012, Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, p 41–44Google Scholar
  9. Farago T, Andics A, Devecseri V et al (2014) Humans rely on the same rules to assess emotional valence and intensity in conspecific and dog vocalizations. Biol Lett 10:20130926–20130926.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frazer Sissom DE, Rice D, Peters G (1991) How cats purr. J Zool 223:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Håkansson G, Westander J (2013) Communication in humans and other animals. John Benjamins Publishing Company, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Houpt KA (2011) Domestic animal behavior for veterinarians and animal scientists, 5th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, AmesGoogle Scholar
  13. International Phonetic Association (ed) (1999) Handbook of the international phonetic Association: a guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Kershenbaum A (2017) Animals, humans, computers, and aliens. Is there anything in common between all their languages? In: Dassow A, Marxer R, Moore RK (eds) Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on vocal interactivity in-and-between humans, animals and robots. University of Skövde, Sweden, p 3Google Scholar
  15. Leyhausen P (2005) Katzenseele: Wesen und Sozialverhalten. Franckh-Kosmos, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  16. McComb K, Taylor AM, Wilson C, Charlton BD (2009) The cry embedded within the purr. Curr Biol 19:R507–R508.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McKinley PE (1982) Cluster analysis of the domestic Cat’s vocal repertoire. Ph.D. Thesis, University of MarylandGoogle Scholar
  18. Moelk M (1944) Vocalizing in the house-cat; a phonetic and functional study. Am J Psychol 57:184–205.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1416947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nicastro N, Owren MJ (2003) Classification of domestic cat (Felis catus) vocalizations by naive and experienced human listeners. J Comp Psychol Wash DC 1983 117:44–52Google Scholar
  20. Ohala J (1994) The frequency codes underlies the sound symbolic use of voice pitch. In: Hinton L, Nichols J, Ohala J (eds) Sound symbolism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 325–347Google Scholar
  21. Owens JL, Olsen M, Fontaine A et al (2017) Visual classification of feral cat Felis silvestris ca-tus vocalizations. Curr Zool 63:331–339.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zox013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schötz S (2012) A phonetic pilot study of vocalisations in three cats. In: Proceedings of Fonetik 2012. Proceedings of Fonetik 2012, Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, University of Gothenburg, pp 45–48Google Scholar
  23. Schötz S (2013) A phonetic pilot study of chirp, chatter, tweet and tweedle in three domestic cats. In: Proceedings of Fonetik 2013. Linköping University, Linköping, pp 65–68Google Scholar
  24. Schötz S (2014) A pilot study of human perception of emotions from domestic cat vocalisations. In: Heldner M (ed) Proceedings from Fonetik 2014. Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Stockholm University, pp 95–100Google Scholar
  25. Schötz S (2015) Agonistic vocalisations in domestic cats : a case study. In: Svensson Lundmark M, Ambrazaitis G, van de Weijer J (eds) Working papers. Lund University, Lund, pp 85–90Google Scholar
  26. Schötz S (2016) Cat sounds: cat vocalisation types. In: Melody human–cat commun. http://vr.humlab.lu.se/projects/meowsic/catvoc.html. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
  27. Schötz S (2017) Die geheime Sprache der Katzen (The Secret Language of Cats). Ecowin, SalzburgGoogle Scholar
  28. Schötz S (2018) The secret language of cats: how to understand your cat for a better, happier relationship, Hanover Square, Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  29. Schötz S, Eklund R (2011) A comparative acoustic analysis of purring in four cats. In: Proceedings of Fonetik 2011. TMH-QPSR, Stockholm, pp 9–12Google Scholar
  30. Schötz S, van de Weijer J (2014) A study of human perception of intonation in domestic cat meows. In: Campbell N, Gibbon D, Hirst D (eds) Proceedings of speech prosody. DublinGoogle Scholar
  31. Schötz S, van de Weijer J, Eklund R (2017) Phonetic characteristics of domestic cat vocalisations. In: Dassow A, Marxer R, Moore RK (eds) Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on vocal interactivity in-and-between humans, animals and robots. University of Skövde, Sweden, pp 5–6Google Scholar
  32. Turner DC, Bateson PPG (eds) (2000) The domestic cat: the biology of its behaviour, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Yeon SC, Kim YK, Park SJ et al (2011) Differences between vocalization evoked by social stimuli in feral cats and house cats. Behav Process 87:183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Logopedics, Phoniatrics, and AudiologyClinical Sciences Lund, Lund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations