Skip to main content

How to Optimize the Input Efficiency of Keyboard Buttons in Large Smartphone? A Comparison of Curved Keyboard and Keyboard Area Size

Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS,volume 1088)

Abstract

Smartphone has been constantly optimizing the user experience of viewing content by increasing screen size. However, larger screen brings about unsatisfactory input issue, especially for one-handed users. Curved QWERTY keyboard and reduced soft keyboard area are proposed to solve the input inefficiency issue of application design in the large smartphones. Following the design of existing curved keyboards, we designed a keyboard application, which could collect all the usage data, to test whether the curved keyboard or reduced-area keyboard could indeed solve the input inefficiency issue. By using within-subject design. we compared 2 screen sizes (5.0 in. vs. 6.5 in.), 2 area sizes (small-area: letter key area is 4.9 mm × 7 mm vs. large-area: letter key area is 6.3 mm × 9 mm), and 2 keyboard layouts (curved QWERTY vs. traditional QWERTY). The results show that the large-area keyboard is significantly better in terms of pairs per minute and reaction time between two keys, at the same time, the curved keyboard performs worse than the traditional keyboard. It indicates that the two design elements are not a common practice.

Keywords

  • Curved QWERTY keyboard
  • Reduced input area
  • Input efficiency
  • Reachability

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30712-7_11
  • Chapter length: 8 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-30712-7
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

References

  1. ZOL mobile Honor 8X. http://detail.zol.com.cn/1210/1209676/param.shtml. Accessed 13 June 2019

  2. ZOL mobile Huawei Changxiang 6S. http://detail.zol.com.cn/1158/1157596/param.shtml. Accessed 13 June 2019

  3. Boring, S., Ledo, D., Chen, X., Marquardt, N., Tang, A., Greenberg, S.: The fat thumb: using the thumb’s contact size for single-handed mobile interaction. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, San Francisco, USA, pp. 39–48. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kim, S., Yu, J., Lee, G.: Interaction techniques for unreachable objects on the touchscreen. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 295–298. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu, N.H., Huang, D.Y., Hsu, J.J., Hung, Y.P.: Rapid selection of hard-to-access targets by thumb on mobile touch-screens. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Munich, Germany, pp. 400–403. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Girouard, A., Lo, J., Riyadh, M., Daliri, F., Eady, A.K., Pasquero, J.: One-handed bend interactions with deformable smartphones. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, pp. 1509–1518. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gkoumas, A., Komninos, A., Garofalakis, J.: Usability of visibly adaptive smartphone keyboard layouts. In: Proceedings of the 20th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics, Patras, Greece, p. 40. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goel, M., Jansen, A., Mandel, T., Patel, S.N., Wobbrock, J.O.: Context-type: using hand posture information to improve mobile touch screen text entry. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, pp. 2795–2798. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gelormini, D., Bishop, B.: Optimizing the android virtual keyboard: a study of user experience. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW), San Jose, USA, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nicolau, H., Guerreiro, T., Lucas, D., Jorge, J.: Mobile text-entry and visual demands: reusing and optimizing current solutions. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 13(3), 291–301 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Rudchenko, D., Paek, T., Badger, E.: Text text revolution: a game that improves text entry on mobile touchscreen keyboards. In: Lyons, K., Hightower, J., Huang, Elaine M. (eds.) Pervasive 2011. LNCS, vol. 6696, pp. 206–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21726-5_13

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Bi, X., Smith, B.A., Zhai, S.: Quasi-qwerty soft keyboard optimization. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, USA, pp. 283–286. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bi, X., Zhai, S.: Ijqwerty: what difference does one key change make? Gesture typing keyboard optimization bounded by one key position change from qwerty. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, USA, pp. 49–58. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dunlop, M., Levine, J.: Multidimensional pareto optimization of touch-screen keyboards for speed, familiarity and improved spell checking. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, USA, pp. 2669–2678. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. MacKenzie, I.S., Zhang, S.X.: The design and evaluation of a high-performance soft keyboard. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Pittsburgh, USA, pp. 25–31. ACM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, B.A., Bi, X., Zhai, S.: Optimizing touchscreen keyboards for gesture typing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, pp. 3365–3374. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ljubic, S., Glavinic, V., Kukec, M.: Effects of interaction style and screen size on touchscreen text entry performance: an empirical research. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014. LNCS, vol. 8514, pp. 68–79. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07440-5_7

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhai, S., Kristensson, P.O.: The word-gesture keyboard: reimagining keyboard interaction. Commun. ACM 55(9), 91–101 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Trudeau, M.B., Sunderland, E.M., Jindrich, D.L., Dennerlein, J.T.: A data-driven design evaluation tool for handheld device soft keyboards. PLoS ONE 9(9), e107070 (2014)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Fitts, P.M.: The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. 47(6), 381 (1954)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Guiard, Y., Beaudouin-Lafon, M.: Fitts’ law 50 years later: applications and contributions from human-computer interaction. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 61(6), 747–750 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, J., Oulasvirta, A.: Modeling the functional area of the thumb on mobile touchscreen surfaces. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada, pp. 1991–2000. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jibo He .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Y., Ai, H., Liang, Q., Chang, W., He, J. (2019). How to Optimize the Input Efficiency of Keyboard Buttons in Large Smartphone? A Comparison of Curved Keyboard and Keyboard Area Size. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds) HCI International 2019 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1088. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30712-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30712-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30711-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30712-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)