Skip to main content

Online Voting in a First Nation in Canada: Implications for Participation and Governance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Electronic Voting (E-Vote-ID 2019)

Abstract

Indigenous communities are increasingly adopting technology to create digital opportunities for members and enhance engagement and governance. One recent trend in the adoption of online services is the use of online voting. To date, more than 90 Indigenous communities in Canada and the United States have deployed online voting with many more considering implementation. This article draws upon interviews with local government officials and voter exit surveys as part of community-engaged research with Wasauksing First Nation in Ontario, Canada to explore the specific opportunities and challenges online voting presents for governance and engagement in Indigenous communities and implications for future adoption. Specifically, we examine a 2017 Land Code vote where online voting was introduced to achieve a participation threshold required to pass the framework. Our findings point to online voting as a key tool to modernize Indigenous governance and enhance participatory capacity by making voting more accessible for members. We argue that online voting is an engine that can advance self-determination and support communities seeking an iterative path to self-government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The paper voter sample includes more women (64%) than men (34%), with 2% identifying as ‘other’. Paper voter respondents have a median age of 46 years, household income range of $20,000 to $29,000, median education level of “some technical community college”, and are likely to reside on reserve. The sample of online voters, by comparison, also contains more women (71%) than men (29%). This sample also reports a median age of 46, household income range between $80,000 and $99,000, median education of completed “technical, community college”, and are more likely to live off-reserve.

  2. 2.

    While the N’s are small, they are very good based on the size of the community.

References

  1. Abele, F., Prince, M.J.: Four pathways to Aboriginal self-government in Canada. Am. Rev. Can. Stud. 36(4), 568–595 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alcantara, C., Davidson, A.: Negotiating aboriginal self-government agreements in canada: an analysis of the inuvialuit experience. Can. J. Polit. Sci. 48(03), 553–575 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alfred, T., Corntassel, J.: Being Indigenous: resurgences against contemporary colonialism. Gov. Opposition 40(4), 597–614 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asch, M.: On being here to stay: treaties and Aboriginal rights in Canada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coulthard, G.S.: Red skin, white masks: rejecting the colonial politics of recognition (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Dickson, G., Green, K.L.: Participatory action research: lessons learned with Aboriginal grandmothers. Health Care Women Int. 22, 471–482 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ermine, W., Sinclair, R., Jeffery, B.: The Ethics of Research Involving Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous Peoples’ Health Research Centre, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gabel, C., Goodman, N.: Indigenous Experiences with Online Voting. Report (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gabel, C., Goodman, N., Bird, K., Budd, B.: Indigenous adoption of internet voting: a case study of Whitefish River First Nation. Int. Indigenous Policy J. 7(3), 3 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabel, C., Goodman, N., Bird, K., Budd, B.: The impact of digital technology on First Nations participation and governance. Can. J. Native Stud. 36, 107–127 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gabel, C.: Towards Healthier Aboriginal Health Policies? Navigating the Labyrinth for Answers. Ph.D. Dissertation, McMaster University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Germann, M., Serdült, U.: Internet voting and turnout: evidence from Switzerland. Electoral. Stud. 47, 1–12 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Goodman, N., Pyman, H.: Understanding the effects of internet voting on elections: Results from the 2014 Ontario municipal elections. Technical Paper, Centre for e-Democracy (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goodman, N., Gabel, C., Budd, B.: Online voting in Indigenous Communities: lessons from Canada. In: Krimmer, R., et al. (eds.) E-Vote-ID 2018. LNCS, vol. 11143, pp. 67–83. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00419-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Goodman, N., Stokes, L. C. Reducing the cost of voting: an evaluation of internet voting’s effect on turnout. Br. J. Pol. Sci. 1–13 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Imai, S.: The Structure of the Indian Act: Accountability in Government. Research Paper for the National Centre for First Nations Governance, Ottawa, ON (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ladner, K.L.: Understanding the impact of self-determination on communities in crisis. Int. J. Indigenous Health 5(2), 88–101 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ladner, K.L.: Political genocide: Killing nations through legislation and slow-moving poison. In: Colonial Genocide in Indigenous North America eds. Alexander Laban Hilton, Andrew Woolford and Jeff Benvenuto. Duke University Press, Durham NC (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lightfoot, S.: Global Indigenous Politics: A Subtle Revolution. Routledge, New York (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Lockhart, E., Tenasco, A., Whiteduck, T., O’Donnell, S.: Information and communication technology for education in an Algonquin First Nation in Quebec. J. Community Inf. 10(2) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. McMahon, R., LaHache, T., Whiteduck, T. Digital data management as Indigenous resurgence in Kahnawà:ke. Int. Indigenous Policy J. 6(3) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. McMahon, R.: From digital divides to the first mile: indigenous peoples and the network society in Canada. Int. J. Commun. 8, 25 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. McMahon, R., Gurstein, M., Beaton, B., O’Donnell, S., Whiteduck, T.: Making information technologies work at the end of the road. J. Inf. Policy 4, 250–269 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Minkler, M., Wallerstein, N.: Community Based Participatory Research for Health. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Moore, C., Castleden, H.E., Tirone, S., Martin, D.: Implementing the tri-council policy on ethical research involving indigenous peoples in Canada: so, how’s that going in Mi’kma’ki? Int. Indigenous Policy J. 8(2), 4 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Donnell, S., Beaton, B., McMahon, R., Hudson, H.E., Williams, D., Whiteduck, T.: Digital technology adoption in remote and Northern Indigenous Communities In Canada. Canadian Sociological Association Annual Conference. University Of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, June (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Papillon, M., Bakvis, H., Skogstad, G.: Canadian Federalism: Performance, Effectiveness, and Legitimacy, pp. 284–301. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sweet, M., Pearson, L., Dudgeon, P.: IndigenousX: a case study of community-led innovation in digital media. Media International Australia 149(1), 104–111 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

All authors contributed equally to this research. Authorship is listed alphabetically. We extend our deep thanks to Wasauksing First Nation for taking part in this research. Research undertaken for this article was financially supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and Chelsea Gabel’s Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Well-Being, Community-Engagement and Innovation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Goodman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Budd, B., Gabel, C., Goodman, N. (2019). Online Voting in a First Nation in Canada: Implications for Participation and Governance. In: Krimmer, R., et al. Electronic Voting. E-Vote-ID 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11759. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30625-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30625-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30624-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30625-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics