Abstract
The essay explores how the imagination contributes to moral normativity. The purpose is not to argue that the imagination provides a particular mode of reasoning. It does not. Rather, the imagination can present riveting images based on practical experience that facilitate reasons to coalesce around a conclusion. This presents what can be seen as a common sense view of moral normativity. The experience of marriage or belief in God can be illustrative of reaching certitude even when demonstrative proof is not feasible. In this process, the imagination must always be accountable to reasoning. Also, the dynamic nature of experiential images can inspire action, contrasting with abstract modes of moral normativity that may appear detached from accompanying action. The analysis suggests that the abstract process of formal reasoning adopted in the classical principle of double effect can be enhanced by a role for the imagination. The role facilitates personal and practical reasoning to coalesce around insight and moral conclusions that can be explained further using the abstract process of double effect reasoning. This approach can foster doctrinal development in Catholic bioethics. The religious epistemology and theological method of John Henry Newman (1801–1890) are discussed to provide a theoretical explanation of this interaction between the imagination and reasoning as a distinctive contribution to moral normativity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Pope John Paul II (1993), number 4.
- 2.
Pope John Paul II (1993), number 75.
- 3.
Kelly et al. (2013).
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Code of canon Law (1983).
- 7.
U.S. Bishops (2009), number 45.
- 8.
U.S. Bishops (2009), number 47.
- 9.
Magill (2011).
- 10.
- 11.
U.S. Bishops (2010).
- 12.
Pope John Paul II (1995), number 73.
- 13.
Kelly et al. (2013), chapter 24.
- 14.
- 15.
Pope Paul VI (1968), number 12 & 14.
- 16.
Pope Paul VI (1968), number 15.
- 17.
- 18.
Pope John Paul II (1995), 55.
- 19.
Pope John Paull II (1994), number 4.
- 20.
Newman (1870a).
- 21.
Newman (1843).
- 22.
Newman (1870a), 316.
- 23.
Newman (1870a), 121.
- 24.
Newman (1870a), 65–65, 390,
- 25.
Newman (1870a), 259.
- 26.
Newman (1843), 256, 263.
- 27.
Newman (1870a), 95–96.
- 28.
Newman (1843), 274.
- 29.
Newman (1864b), 126.
- 30.
Newman (1870a), 327.
- 31.
Newman (1870a), 329, 411.
- 32.
Newman (1870a), 317.
- 33.
Newman (1870a), 325–326.
- 34.
Newman (1870a), 318; (1864b), 146
- 35.
Newman (1870a), 354–356.
- 36.
Newman (1870a), 93.
- 37.
Newman (1870a), 77.
- 38.
Newman (1870a), 356.
- 39.
Newman (1870a), 355.
- 40.
Newman (1870a), 360–361.
- 41.
Newman (1864a).
- 42.
Newman (1870a), 92–93.
- 43.
Newman (1870a), 117.
- 44.
Newman (1870a), 10–11.
- 45.
Newman (1870a), 105–106.
- 46.
Newman (1870a), 110.
- 47.
Newman (1870a), 113–114.
- 48.
Newman (1896), 247.
- 49.
Newman (1896), 253.
- 50.
Fuchs (1983), 101.
- 51.
Newman (1859), 103.
- 52.
Newman (1859), 63.
- 53.
Newman (1859), 55.
- 54.
Newman (1867), 254.
- 55.
Newman (1864a), 110.
- 56.
Newman (1877), xlvii.
- 57.
Newman (1864a): 447.
- 58.
Newman (1864a), 416.
- 59.
Newman (1844), 427.
- 60.
Tristram (1957), 272.
- 61.
Newman (1864a), 239.
- 62.
Newman (1870b), 18.
- 63.
Newman (1870b), 166.
- 64.
Newman (1871), 310.
- 65.
Newman (1874), 261.
- 66.
Newman (1874), 243.
References
Abelson, R., et al. 1977. The Philosophical Imagination. An Introduction to Philosophy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Catechism. 2000. Catechism of the Catholic Church. Rome: Vatican City.
Code of Canon Law. 1983. Rome: Vatican City.
Fuchs, Josef. 1983. Personal Responsibility and Christian Morality. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
Gardner, H. 1982. In Defense of the Imagination. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Janssens, J. 1972. Ontic Evil and Moral Evil. Louvain Studies 4: 115–156.
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind. In The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 1993. Moral Imagination. Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kaczor, C. 1998. Double-Effect Reasoning From Jean Pierre Gury to Peter Knauer. Theological Studies 59: 297–315.
Kaufman, G. 1981. The Theological Imagination. Constructing the Concept of God. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Keenan, J.F. 1993. The Function of the Principle of Double Effect. Theological Studies 54: 294–315.
Kelly, D.F., G. Magill, and H. ten Have. 2013. Contemporary Catholic Health Care Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Knauer, P. 1967. The Hermeneutic Function of the Principle of Double Effect. Natural Law Forum 12: 132–162.
Liebard, O.M. 1978. Love and Sexuality, Official Catholic Teachings. Wilmington: Consortium.
Lovibond, S. 1983. Realism and Imagination in Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lysaught, M.T. 2011. Moral Analysis of Procedure at Phoenix Hospital. Origins 40: 537–549, at 538.
Mackey, J.P., ed. 1986. The Religious Imagination. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Magill, G. 2011. Threat of Imminent Death in Pregnancy: A Role for Double effect Reasoning. Theological Studies 72: 848–878.
Mangan, J.T. 1949. An Historical Analysis of the Principle of Double Effect. Theological Studies 10: 41–61.
McIntyre, J. 1987. Faith, Theology and Imagination. Edinburgh: The Handsel Press.
Newman, J.H. 1843. Newman’s University Sermons: Fifteen Sermons Preached before the University of Oxford 1826–43. Edited and Introduction by D.M. McKinnon, and J.D. Holmes. London: SPCK, 1970.
———. 1844. The Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman. Vol. X. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
———. 1859. On Consulting the Faithful in Matters of Doctrine. Edited with an Introduction by J. Coulson. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1961.
———. 1864a. Apologia Pro Vita Sua. Edited, Introduction and Notes by M. J. Svaglic. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1967.
———. 1864b. The Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman. Vol. XXI. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.
———. 1867. The Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman. Vol. XXIII. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.
———. 1870a. An Essay in Aid of a Grammar of Assent. Edited, Introduction, and Notes by I. Ker. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985.
———. 1870b. The Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman. Vol. XXV. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.
———. 1871. The Letters and Diaries of John Henry Newman. Vol. XXV. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.
———. 1874. Letter to the Duke of Norfolk. In Certain Difficulties felt by Anglicans in Catholic Teaching, vol. II. London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1896.
———. 1877. The Via Media of the Anglican Church. Vol. I. In, Edited with Introduction and Notes by H.D. Weidner. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 1896. Certain Difficulties felt by Anglicans in Catholic Teaching. Vol. II. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
Pope John Paul II. 1993. The Splendor of Truth. Rome: Vatican City.
———. 1994. Apostolic Letter, Ordinatio Sacerdotalis. Rome: Vatican City.
———. 1995. The Gospel of Life. Rome: Vatican City.
Pope Paul VI. 1968. Humanae Vitae. Rome: Vatican City.
Pope Pius XII. 1951. Address to the Associations of the Large Families. Acta Apostolicae Sedis 43 (November 26): 855–860.
Ricoeur, P. 1995. Figuring the Sacred. Religion, Narrative, and Imagination. Translated by David Pellauer and edited by Mark. I. Wallace. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Touhey, J.F. 2011. “A Fatal Conflict: Can Catholic Hospitals Refuse to Save Lives?” Commonweal 38:2 (January 28): 8–10.
Tracy, D. 1981. The Analogical Imagination. Christian Theology and the Culture of Pluralism. London: SCM.
Tristram, H., ed. 1957. John Henry Newman. Autobiographical Writings. Edited with an Introduction by H. Tristram. London: Sheed and Ward.
U.S. Bishops. 2009. Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services. 5th ed. USCCB: Washington, DC.
———. 2010. Committee on Doctrine. “The Distinction Between Direct Abortion and Legitimate Medical Procedures.” USCCB, Washington, DC, June 23.
Warnock, M. 1976. Imagination. London: Faber and Faber.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Suggested Readings
Suggested Readings
-
Banner, M. 2016. Ethics of Everyday Life: Moral Theology, Social Anthropology, and the Imagination of the Human. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Greeley, Andrew. 2001. The Catholic Imagination. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Jennings, W.J. 2011. The Christian Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press.
-
Kaag, J. 2014. Thinking Through the Imagination. Aesthetics in Human Cognition. New York: Fordham University Press.
-
Kieran, M., and Lopes, D., eds. 2012. Imagination, Philosophy and the Arts. London: Routledge.
-
Kind, A. 2016. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. London: Routledge.
-
Magill, G. 2015. The Religious Morality of John Henry Newman. Hermeneutics of the Imagination. New York: Springer.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Magill, G. (2020). Using the Imagination in Normative Moral Reasoning Around the Principle of Double Effect to Foster Doctrinal Development in Catholic Bioethics. In: Gielen, J. (eds) Dealing with Bioethical Issues in a Globalized World . Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30432-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30432-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30431-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30432-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)