Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technochimp: An African Savannah Survivor Looking for Solutions in the Modern World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The World's Worst Problems

  • 585 Accesses

Abstract

Here I cover advances in social science that can be used to predict average human behavior. It considers costs and benefits to cooperation. There is also discussion of why some people are unwilling to accept scientific facts, even though it might ultimately not be in their best interests to do so. Finally, these aspects are considered with respect to individual-based solutions to global problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Diamond J (2014) The third chimpanzee. Oneworld Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hein G, Morishima Y, Leiberg S, Sul S, Fehr E (2016) The brain’s functional network architecture reveals human motives. Science 351(6277):1074–1078. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hofman JM, Sharma A, Watts DJ (2017) Prediction and explanation in social systems. Science 355(6324):486–488. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zuk M (2013) Paleofantasy: what evolution really tells us about sex, diet, and how we live. WW Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Falk A, Szech N (2013) Morals and markets. Science 340(6133):707–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Henrich J, McElreath R, Barr A, Ensminger J, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A et al (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312(5781):1767–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levin SA (2014) Public goods in relation to competition, cooperation, and spite. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(Supplement 3):10838–10845. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1400830111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sigmund K, De Silva H, Traulsen A, Hauert C (2010) Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons. Nature 466(7308):861–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Galbiati R, Henry E, Jacquemet N (2018) Dynamic effects of enforcement on cooperation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115(49):12425–12428. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1813502115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kruger J, Dunning D (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 77(6):1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lord CG, Ross L, Lepper MR (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 37(11):2098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2(2):175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bodin Ö (2017) Collaborative environmental governance: achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science 357(6352):eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lloyd WF (1980) WF Lloyd on the checks to population. Popul Dev Rev 6(3):473–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyd R, Richerson PJ, Meinzen-Dick R, De Moor T, Jackson MO, Gjerde KM et al (2018) Tragedy revisited. Science 362(6420):1236–1241. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw0911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rustagi D, Engel S, Kosfeld M (2010) Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science 330(6006):961–965. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips T (2015) Human altruism and cooperation explainable as adaptations to past environments no longer fully evident in the modern world. Q Rev Biol 90(3):295–314. https://doi.org/10.1086/682589

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA

    Walter Dodds

Authors
  1. Walter Dodds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dodds, W. (2019). Technochimp: An African Savannah Survivor Looking for Solutions in the Modern World. In: The World's Worst Problems . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30410-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation