Abstract
Analysis of the field measurements recorded provided information about the sprinkler system and its operation. The distribution characteristic (DC) of 66% indicated the pattern was uniform and that the drop-off in application rate at the outer perimeter was fairly rapid. A little higher value and steeper drop-off would be even better, since the overlap was small at the operating radius of 4.0 for the 7.0 m tree and sprinkler spacing. The current irrigation management program of 24-hour sets produced storage efficiency (SE) of 72%. This is quite low for orchard sprinklers, since 28% of the applied water would not be available for the trees. Of this, approximately 10% was lost to evaporation and/or possible inaccuracies in measurements. Leakage from the sprinkler was not measured and is not included in the 10%. The remaining 18% went too deep. This loss to deep percolation was caused by running the sprinkler 24 h, which was too long. The analysis showed that 19-hour sets would increase the SE to 89%. For the soil moisture depletion (SMD) of 10 cm, an average of about 8.4 cm was stored under the circular wetted area by the 24-hour set, but only 3.2 inches would be stored during a 19-hour set. Changing to a 19-hour set would theoretically require slightly more frequent (3%) irrigation, but would require only 79% as much water per irrigation. For the presently used sprinkler pattern, which wets only part of the soil, the average depth of 8.1 stored over the whole orchard area should be used for computations of irrigation frequency based on the evapotranspiration rate. For determining the SMD at which to irrigate from field SMD checks, the SMD should be matched to the management allowed depletion (MAD) in the central, uniformly irrigated area. Since at the time of this field study, SMD = MAD = 10 cm, it was the correct day for irrigating. Therefore, micro-sprinkler irrigation system improves the existing water productivity; water use efficiency and economic returns through improving DC and SE for the field crops growing under orchard area, increase yield and great control of applied water. Good management of micro-sprinkler irrigation system provides great water and soil conservation and reduces applied water requirement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
FAO (2001) Sprinkler irrigation systems, planning, design, operation and maintenance. Irrigation manual 8, Harare, Zimbabwe
Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA) (2013) Microirrigation. Part 623: National engineering handbook, chapter 7, pp 19–191
Michael M (2014) Micro-irrigation design for avocado orchard in California. Agricultural Systems Management, Bio Resource and Agricultural Engineering Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA
Yuan S, Ransford D, Zhu X, Junping L, Kun T (2017) Optimization of movable irrigation system and performance assessment of distribution uniformity under varying conditions. Int J Agric Biol Eng 10:72–79. Open Access at https://www.ijabe.org
Ayars J, Phene C (2007) Automation. In: Lamm FR, Ayars JE, Nakayama S (eds) Micro-irrigation for crop production, chap. 7, pp 259–284
Boswell MJ (1984) Micro-irrigation design manual. James Hardie Irrigation Co., El Cajon, CA
Burt C, Styles S (1994) Drip and microirrigation for trees, vines, and row crops. Irrig. Training and Research Center, Calif. Polytechnic State Univ., San Luis Obispo, CA 292 pp.
Hassan F (1998) Microirrigation management and maintenance. Agro Industrial, Fresno, CA
Howell TA, Meron M (2006) Irrigation scheduling. In: Lamm FR, Ayars JE, Nakayama FS (eds) Microirrigation for crop production. Design, operation, and management, 2nd edn. Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp 61–130
Keller J, Bliesner R (1990) Sprinkler and trickle irrigation. Chapman and Hall, New York
Godin R, Broner I (2013) Micro-sprinkler irrigation for orchards fact sheet no. 4.703. Crop Series|Irrigation. www.ext.colostate.edu
Christiansen J (1942) Irrigation by sprinkling. Bulletin 670, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of California, Berkeley, CA
FAO (2002) Localized irrigation systems, planning, design, operation and maintenance. Irrigation manual 9, Harare, Zimbabwe
ASAE (1990) ASAE EP405.1. Design and installation of micro-irrigation systems
FAO (2002) Monitoring the technical and financial performance of an irrigation scheme. Irrigation manual 14, Harare, Zimbabwe
Sudhakar P, Hanumantharayappa SK, Swamy GMR, Jalaja SK, Sivaprasad V (2018) Impact of micro irrigation methods on mulberry (Morus alba L.) leaf quality and production. Int J Pure Appl Biosci 6:332–339
Merriam JL (1978) Farm irrigation system evaluation: a guide for management
Ngasoh F, Anyadike C, Mbajiorgu C, Usman M (2018) Performance evaluation of sprinkler irrigation system at Mambilla beverage limited, Kakara-Gembu, Taraba State-Nigeria. Niger J Technol (NIJOTECH) 37:268–274
Griddle W, Sterling D, Claude HP, Dell G (1965) Methods for evaluating irrigation systems. Agricultural handbook, no. 82. SCS, USDA, Washington, DC
Merriam JL (1968) Irrigation system evaluation and improvement. Blake Printery, San Luis Obispo, CA
James D, Awu D, Pamdaya N, Kasali M (2018) Effect of micro-sprinkler irrigation application efficiency for Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) farming. Int J Basic Appl Sci 6:98–103
Pair C (ed) (1975) Sprinkler irrigation, 4th edn. Sprinkler Irrigation Association, Silver Spring, MD
SCS national engineering handbook (1967) Planning farm irrigation systems, chap 3, sect 15. USDA, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Annex 1
Annex 1
Form 1
Orchard Sprinkler Irrigation Evaluation
-
1.
Location Nubaria Observer Alaa El-Bably Date 6/17/2015
-
2.
Crop citrus, root zone depth 1.5 m, MAD 50%, MAD 10.0 cm
-
3.
Soil: texture sandy loam, available moisture 4.1 cm/30 cm, SMD 10 cm
-
4.
Tree: pattern square spacing 7.2 m by 7.2 m
-
5.
Sprinkler: make BE, model B-21, nozzles #1 by cm spacing 7.2 by 7.2 m, location to trees center
-
6.
Irrigation: duration 24 h, frequency 21 days
-
7.
Rated sprinkler discharge 0.222 m3 h at 20 psi and diameter 8.0 m
-
8.
Sprinkler jet: height 1.0, interference negligible
-
9.
Actual sprinkler pressure and discharge (see back for location):
Sprinkler locations | Test | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pressure (psi) | 19 | 21 | 18 | 19 |
Catch volume (l) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Catch time (s) | 54 | 52 | 55 | 54 |
Discharge (m3 h) | 0.244 | 0.245 | 0.244 | 0.243 |
Wetted diameter (m) | 7.8 | 8.1 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
-
10.
Container row test data in units of cm, volume/depth ml/cm
Test: start 7:20 pm, stop 8:00 am, duration 12 h 40 min = 1 2.67 h
Catch (cm) | 7.1 | 6.1 | 6.4 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 5.31 | 1.3 |
Rate (cm h−1) | 0.56 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.41 | 0.10 |
-
11.
Discharge pressures: max 21 psi, min 18 psi, ave 19 psi
-
12.
Comments: The citrus tree branches did not obstruct the sprinkler jets and the sprinklers rotated smoothly and uniformly. The system is the portable hose-pull type.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abd El-Hafez, S.A., Mahmoud, M.A., El-Bably, A.Z. (2020). Micro-sprinkler Irrigation of Orchard. In: Omran, ES., Negm, A. (eds) Technological and Modern Irrigation Environment in Egypt. Springer Water. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30375-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30375-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30374-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30375-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)