Skip to main content

The Compare of Solo Programming Strategies in a Scrum Team: A Multi-agent Simulation Tool for Scrum Team Dynamics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems Applications in Software Engineering (CoMeSySo 2019 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1046))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Scrum is an agile framework within which people can address complex problems, while productively and creatively delivering products of the highest possible value. A strategy is a way that people going to solve problems based on the existing situation. Team strategy research is different from team composition and how it affects the performance. Team composition can affect the performance is an existing knowledge, without doing simulation, we still can know how personality and capability can affect its performance. But strategy and task allocations methods are a further research go beyond that, particular in an environment, such as scrum, that has an aim for why the team needs to be composed. With the same team, the same task but different strategy can cause significant various outcome for each sprint. This is the way that agent-based modelling is more useful than just say that team composition can affect its work. And based on the current information, to do investigation on how team composition can affect performance will needs various teams, but how strategies can affect team performance will only need the same team to be compared. Scrum is the major motivation that why team needs a strategy to work, the purpose of this strategy is not to investigate how team composition can affect the work but more about how to use the existing affect from the team composition to get the Scrum success rate enhanced, as in real world, we could not change the team as the company only has the team to do the job, but we can change the way that they are doing the job.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Noori, F., Kazemifard, M.: Simulation of pair programming using multi-agent and MBTI personality model. In: 2015 Sixth International Conference of Cognitive Science (ICCS), Tehran, pp. 29–36 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/cogsci.2015.7426665

  2. Wernick, P., Hall, T.: The impact of using pair programming on system evolution a simulation-based study. In: Proceeding of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 2004). IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lui, K.M., Chan, K.C.: Pair programming productivity: novice-novice vs. expert-expert. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64(9), 915–925 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vanhanen, J., Korpi, H.: Experiences of using pair programming in an agile project. In: 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2007, Waikoloa, HI, pp. 274b–274b (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2007.218

  5. Han, K.W., Lee, E., Lee, Y.: The impact of a peer-learning agent based on pair programming in a programming course. IEEE Trans. Educ. 53(2), 318–327 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/te.2009.2019121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Swamidurai, R., Umphress, D.: The impact of static and dynamic pairs on pair programming. In: 2014 Eighth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability-Companion (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Williams, L., Shukla, A., Anton, A.I.: An initial exploration of the relationship between pair programming and Brooks’ law (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Plonka, L., Sharp, H., Linden, J., Dittrich, Y.: Knowledge transfer in pair programming: An in-depth analysis. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 73, 66–78 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to Multi-agent Systems. Wiley, Hoboken (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J.: Manifesto for agile software development (2001). http://agilemanifesto.org/

  11. Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.: Simulation for the Social Scientist, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, (2005). ISBN 0335216005

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, J., Yu, H., Shen, Z., Miao, C.: Studying task allocation decisions of novice agile teams with data from agile project management tools. In: ASE 2014, Vasteras, Sweden, 15–19 September 2014. ACM (2014). 978-1-4503-3013-9/14/09

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Z.: The impact of expertise on pair programming productivity in a scrum team: a multi-agent simulation. In: 2018 IEEE 9th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), Beijing, China, pp. 399–402 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/icsess.2018.8663874

  14. Wang, Z.: Estimating productivity in a scrum team: a multi-agent simulation. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation, ICCMS 2019, pp. 239–245. ACM, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3307363.3310985

  15. Wang, Z.: Teamworking strategies of scrum team: a multi-agent based simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence (CSAI 2018), pp. 404–408. ACM, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3297156.3297179

Download references

Acknowledgement

Sincerely, Thanks for Dr Patricia Anthony and Dr. Stuart Charter at Lincoln University, New Zealand to support this PhD research, also thanks for Pro. Guojian Cheng at Xi’an Petroleum University, China. Dr Gang Li at Deakin University, Australia and Professor Longbing Cao at University of Technology Sydney provides funding in the related data analysis and machine learning research which I was doing my invited research at UTS, Australia. I also thanks to Edinburgh Napier University, United Kingdom where I get my Msc in Advanced Software Engineering. They are all my best Supervisors support me to growth and become more and more professional.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhe Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Z. (2019). The Compare of Solo Programming Strategies in a Scrum Team: A Multi-agent Simulation Tool for Scrum Team Dynamics. In: Silhavy, R., Silhavy, P., Prokopova, Z. (eds) Intelligent Systems Applications in Software Engineering. CoMeSySo 2019 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1046. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30329-7_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics