Abstract
Scrum is an agile framework within which people can address complex problems, while productively and creatively delivering products of the highest possible value. A strategy is a way that people going to solve problems based on the existing situation. Team strategy research is different from team composition and how it affects the performance. Team composition can affect the performance is an existing knowledge, without doing simulation, we still can know how personality and capability can affect its performance. But strategy and task allocations methods are a further research go beyond that, particular in an environment, such as scrum, that has an aim for why the team needs to be composed. With the same team, the same task but different strategy can cause significant various outcome for each sprint. This is the way that agent-based modelling is more useful than just say that team composition can affect its work. And based on the current information, to do investigation on how team composition can affect performance will needs various teams, but how strategies can affect team performance will only need the same team to be compared. Scrum is the major motivation that why team needs a strategy to work, the purpose of this strategy is not to investigate how team composition can affect the work but more about how to use the existing affect from the team composition to get the Scrum success rate enhanced, as in real world, we could not change the team as the company only has the team to do the job, but we can change the way that they are doing the job.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Noori, F., Kazemifard, M.: Simulation of pair programming using multi-agent and MBTI personality model. In: 2015 Sixth International Conference of Cognitive Science (ICCS), Tehran, pp. 29–36 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/cogsci.2015.7426665
Wernick, P., Hall, T.: The impact of using pair programming on system evolution a simulation-based study. In: Proceeding of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 2004). IEEE (2004)
Lui, K.M., Chan, K.C.: Pair programming productivity: novice-novice vs. expert-expert. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64(9), 915–925 (2006)
Vanhanen, J., Korpi, H.: Experiences of using pair programming in an agile project. In: 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2007, Waikoloa, HI, pp. 274b–274b (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2007.218
Han, K.W., Lee, E., Lee, Y.: The impact of a peer-learning agent based on pair programming in a programming course. IEEE Trans. Educ. 53(2), 318–327 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/te.2009.2019121
Swamidurai, R., Umphress, D.: The impact of static and dynamic pairs on pair programming. In: 2014 Eighth International Conference on Software Security and Reliability-Companion (2014)
Williams, L., Shukla, A., Anton, A.I.: An initial exploration of the relationship between pair programming and Brooks’ law (2004)
Plonka, L., Sharp, H., Linden, J., Dittrich, Y.: Knowledge transfer in pair programming: An in-depth analysis. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 73, 66–78 (2015)
Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to Multi-agent Systems. Wiley, Hoboken (2002)
Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J.: Manifesto for agile software development (2001). http://agilemanifesto.org/
Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.: Simulation for the Social Scientist, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, (2005). ISBN 0335216005
Lin, J., Yu, H., Shen, Z., Miao, C.: Studying task allocation decisions of novice agile teams with data from agile project management tools. In: ASE 2014, Vasteras, Sweden, 15–19 September 2014. ACM (2014). 978-1-4503-3013-9/14/09
Wang, Z.: The impact of expertise on pair programming productivity in a scrum team: a multi-agent simulation. In: 2018 IEEE 9th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), Beijing, China, pp. 399–402 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/icsess.2018.8663874
Wang, Z.: Estimating productivity in a scrum team: a multi-agent simulation. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation, ICCMS 2019, pp. 239–245. ACM, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3307363.3310985
Wang, Z.: Teamworking strategies of scrum team: a multi-agent based simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence (CSAI 2018), pp. 404–408. ACM, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3297156.3297179
Acknowledgement
Sincerely, Thanks for Dr Patricia Anthony and Dr. Stuart Charter at Lincoln University, New Zealand to support this PhD research, also thanks for Pro. Guojian Cheng at Xi’an Petroleum University, China. Dr Gang Li at Deakin University, Australia and Professor Longbing Cao at University of Technology Sydney provides funding in the related data analysis and machine learning research which I was doing my invited research at UTS, Australia. I also thanks to Edinburgh Napier University, United Kingdom where I get my Msc in Advanced Software Engineering. They are all my best Supervisors support me to growth and become more and more professional.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, Z. (2019). The Compare of Solo Programming Strategies in a Scrum Team: A Multi-agent Simulation Tool for Scrum Team Dynamics. In: Silhavy, R., Silhavy, P., Prokopova, Z. (eds) Intelligent Systems Applications in Software Engineering. CoMeSySo 2019 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1046. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30329-7_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30329-7_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30328-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30329-7
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)