Skip to main content

Declared Preference Method—Research Experiment Concerning Air Quality

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Experimental and Quantitative Methods in Contemporary Economics (CMEE 2018)

Abstract

Externalities take place when an economic operator does not experience all costs (in case of negative externalities) or benefits (in case of positive externalities) involved in his activities, which are passed on to other economic operators. Specific challenge to economists is posed by negative technological externalities, which have also triggered experimental research studies using the declared (stated) preference method. The aim of the experiment was to find the most preferred solution geared towards the elimination of the source of air pollution in a village and to learn about respondents’ willingness to pay (WTP) for the public good supplied as a result of such elimination. Out of the five proposed options, one of the most preferred by respondents was a voluntary fundraising initiative to collect money for the construction of the neighbour’s connection that would go on until they collect PLN 10 k but not longer than for a year. By using the WTP method, we arrived at an unambiguous valuation of the good expressed in terms of money. The most preferred tax rate revealed as a result of the survey suggests that the valuation of the public good was underestimated. As a result, the situation described in the case study cannot be resolved successfully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baker, R., Ruting, B.: Environmental policy analysis: a guide to non-market valuation. In: Productivity Commission Staff Working Paper, Canberra. Available via Media and Publications. https://www.pc.gov.au/research/supporting/non-market-valuation/non-market-valuation.pdf. Accessed 04 Apr 2019 (2014)

  2. Bowen, H.R.: The interpretation of voting in the allocation of economic resources. Q. J. Econ. 58, 27–48 (1943). https://doi.org/10.2307/1885754. Accessed 04 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brouwer, R.: Constructed preference stability: a test–retest. J. Environ. Econ. Policy 1, 70–84 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/21606544.2011.644922. Accessed 04 Jan 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, C.V., Jackson, P.M.: Public Sector Economics. Blackwell, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, T.C.: Introduction to stated preference methods. In: Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J., Brown, T.C. (eds.) A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. The Economics of Non-market Goods and Resources, vol. 3, pp. 99–110. Springer, Dordrecht (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchanan, J.: The demand and supply of public goods. In: Buchanan, J.M. (ed.) The Collected Work, vol. 5, p. 32. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cochran, W.G.: The chi-square goodness-of-fit test. Ann. Math. Stat. 23(3), 315–345 (1952)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Desmarais-Tremblay, M.: On the Definition of Public Goods. Assessing Richard A. Musgrave’s contribution. Documents available via. de travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00951577/document. Accessed 04 Apr 2019 (2014)

  9. Fisher, R.A.: Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hanemann, W.M.: Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J. Econ. Perspect. 8(4), 19–43 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Loomis, J., Brown, T., Lucero, B., Peterson, G.: Improving validity experiments of contingent valuation methods: results of efforts to reduce the disparity of hypothetical and actual willingness to pay. Land Econ. 72(4), 450–461 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maddala, G.S.: Introduction to Econometrics. Macmillan, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Musgrave, R.A.: A multiple theory of budget determination. Finanzarchiv 17(3), 333–343 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roberts, D.J.: The Lindahl solution for economies with public goods. J. Public Econ. 3(1), 23–42 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Samuelson, P.A.: Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econ. Stat. 37(4), 350–356 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Żylicz, T.: Ekonomia środowiska i zasobów naturalnych (Economics of the environment and natural resources) [in Polish]. PWE, Warszawa (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Małgorzata Burchard-Dziubińska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Burchard-Dziubińska, M., Antczak, E., Rzeńca, A. (2020). Declared Preference Method—Research Experiment Concerning Air Quality. In: Nermend, K., Łatuszyńska, M. (eds) Experimental and Quantitative Methods in Contemporary Economics. CMEE 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30251-1_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics