Skip to main content

An Incremental SAT-Based Approach to the Graph Colouring Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11802))

Abstract

We propose and evaluate a new CNF encoding based on Zykov’s tree for computing the chromatic number of a graph. Zykov algorithms are branch-and-bound procedures, that branch on pairings of vertices that express whether or not two non-adjacent vertices have the same colour. Thus, vertices with the same colour are contracted whereas edges are added between vertices when they have different colours. Such pairings make possible the use of a well-known recurrence relation, that states that the chromatic number of a graph cannot be lower than the chromatic number of its subgraphs. Our encoding associates with any graph and integer k a CNF formula that is satisfiable if and only if the chromatic number of the graph is at least k. We first show that any colouring satisfying a complete pairing always required a fixed number of colours. Then, we establish a CNF encoding that counts the number of colours required by a pairing. However, due to a large number of clauses required to encode transitivity constraints on pairings, a direct encoding does not scale well in practice. To avoid this pitfall, we designed a CEGAR-based (Counter-Example Guided Abstraction Refinement) approach that only encodes a part of the problem and then adds the missing constraints in an incremental way until a valid solution with k colours is found or the unsatisfiability of the problem is proven, meaning that the chromatic number of the graph is greater than k. We show that our encoding scheme performs in many cases significantly better than the state-of-the-art approaches to the graph colouring problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The historical name is misleading: it either merges vertices or adds non-existing edges.

  2. 2.

    The source are accessible at: https://github.com/Mystelven/picasso.

  3. 3.

    https://mat.tepper.cmu.edu/COLOR03/.

References

  1. Marx, D.: Graph colouring problems and their applications in scheduling. Periodica Polytech. Electr. Eng. (Arch.) 48(1–2), 11–16 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis, R.M.R.: A Guide to Graph Colouring - Algorithms and Applications. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25730-3

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaitin, G.J.: Register allocation and spilling via graph coloring (with retrospective). In: McKinley, K.S. (ed.) 20 Years of the ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation 1979–1999, A Selection, pp. 66–74. ACM (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis, R., Thompson, J.M.: On the application of graph colouring techniques in round-robin sports scheduling. Comput. OR 38(1), 190–204 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hussin, B., Basari, A.S.H., Shibghatullah, A.S., Asmai, S.A., Othman, N.S.: Exam timetabling using graph colouring approach. In: 2011 IEEE Conference on Open Systems, pp. 133–138 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gelder, A.V.: Another look at graph coloring via propositional satisfiability. Discrete Appl. Math. 156(2), 230–243 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Schaafsma, B., Heule, M.J.H., van Maaren, H.: Dynamic symmetry breaking by simulating zykov contraction. In: Kullmann, O. (ed.) SAT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5584, pp. 223–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02777-2_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Caramia, M., Dell’Olmo, P.: Coloring graphs by iterated local search traversing feasible and infeasible solutions. Discrete Appl. Math. 156(2), 201–217 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Dowsland, K.A., Thompson, J.M.: An improved ant colony optimisation heuristic for graph colouring. Discrete Appl. Math. 156(3), 313–324 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Galinier, P., Hertz, A., Zufferey, N.: An adaptive memory algorithm for the k-coloring problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 156(2), 267–279 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Brélaz, D.: New methods to color the vertices of a graph. Commun. ACM 22(4), 251–256 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, Z., Li, C.M., Huang, C., Xu, R.: An exact algorithm with learning for the graph coloring problem. Comput. OR 51, 282–301 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hebrard, E., Katsirelos, G.: Clause learning and new bounds for graph coloring. In: Hooker, J. (ed.) CP 2018. LNCS, vol. 11008, pp. 179–194. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98334-9_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Jha, S., Lu, Y., Veith, H.: Counter example-guided abstraction refinement for symbolic model checking. J. ACM 50(5) (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Brummayer, R., Biere, A.: Effective bit-width and under-approximation. In: Moreno-Díaz, R., Pichler, F., Quesada-Arencibia, A. (eds.) EUROCAST 2009. LNCS, vol. 5717, pp. 304–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04772-5_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Seipp, J., Helmert, M.: Counterexample-guided cartesian abstraction refinement for classical planning. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 62, 535–577 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Soh, T., Le Berre, D., Roussel, S., Banbara, M., Tamura, N.: Incremental SAT-based method with native boolean cardinality handling for the hamiltonian cycle problem. In: Fermé, E., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8761, pp. 684–693. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Glorian, G., Lagniez, J.-M., Montmirail, V., Sioutis, M.: An incremental SAT-based approach to reason efficiently on qualitative constraint networks. In: Hooker, J. (ed.) CP 2018. LNCS, vol. 11008, pp. 160–178. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98334-9_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Lagniez, J.-M., Le Berre, D., de Lima, T., Montmirail, V.: An assumption-based approach for solving the minimal S5-satisfiability problem. In: Galmiche, D., Schulz, S., Sebastiani, R. (eds.) IJCAR 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10900, pp. 1–18. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94205-6_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Hooker, J.N.: Logic-based methods for optimization. In: Borning, A. (ed.) PPCP 1994. LNCS, vol. 874, pp. 336–349. Springer, Heidelberg (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-58601-6_111

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Chu, Y., Xia, Q.: A hybrid algorithm for a class of resource constrained scheduling problems. In: Barták, R., Milano, M. (eds.) CPAIOR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3524, pp. 110–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11493853_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Hooker, J.N.: A hybrid method for the planning and scheduling. Constraints 10(4) (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Tran, T.T., Beck, J.C.: Logic-based benders decomposition for alternative resource scheduling with sequence dependent setups. In: Raedt, L.D., (eds.) ECAI 2012–20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Including Prestigious Applications of Artificial Intelligence (PAIS-2012) System Demonstrations Track, Montpellier, France, 27–31 August 2012, Volume 242 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pp. 774–779. IOS Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. de Moura, L., Rueß, H., Sorea, M.: Lazy theorem proving for bounded model checking over infinite domains. In: Voronkov, A. (ed.) CADE 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2392, pp. 438–455. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45620-1_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Ji, X., Ma, F.: An efficient lazy SMT solver for nonlinear numerical constraints. In: Reddy, S., Drira, K., (eds.) 21st IEEE International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, WETICE 2012, Toulouse, France, 25–27 June 2012, pp. 324–329. IEEE Computer Society (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gebremedhin, A.H., Manne, F., Pothen, A.: What color is your Jacobian? Graph coloring for computing derivatives. SIAM Rev. 47(4), 629–705 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Zuckerman, D.: Linear degree extractors and the inapproximability of max clique and chromatic number. Theor. Comput. 3(1), 103–128 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Tseitin, G.S.: On the complexity of derivation in propositional calculus. In: Siekmann, J.H., Wrightson, G. (eds.) Automation of Reasoning. Symbolic Computation (Artificial Intelligence), pp. 466–483. Springer, Heidelberg (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81955-1_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Gent, I.P., Petrie, K.E., Puget, J.: Symmetry in constraint programming. In: Handbook of Constraint Programming, pp. 329–376 (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Asín, R., Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Rodríguez-Carbonell, E.: Cardinality networks: a theoretical and empirical study. Constraints 16(2), 195–221 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Roney-Dougal, C.M., Gent, I.P., Kelsey, T., Linton, S.: Tractable symmetry breaking using restricted search trees. In: de Mántaras, R.L., Saitta, L., (eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Eureopean Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2004, including Prestigious Applicants of Intelligent Systems, PAIS 2004, Valencia, Spain, 22–27 August 2004, pp. 211–215. IOS Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Audemard, G., Lagniez, J.-M., Simon, L.: Improving glucose for incremental SAT solving with assumptions: application to MUS extraction. In: Järvisalo, M., Van Gelder, A. (eds.) SAT 2013. LNCS, vol. 7962, pp. 309–317. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39071-5_23

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Audemard, G., Simon, L.: Predicting learnt clauses quality in modern SAT solvers. In: Boutilier, C., (ed.) IJCAI 2009, Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Pasadena, California, USA, 11–17 July 2009, pp. 399–404 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Davies, J., Bacchus, F.: Exploiting the power of mip solvers in maxsat. In: Järvisalo, M., Van Gelder, A. (eds.) SAT 2013. LNCS, vol. 7962, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39071-5_13

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Morgado, A., Ignatiev, A., Marques-Silva, J.: MSCG: robust core-guided MaxSAT solving. JSAT 9, 129–134 (2014)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Ignatiev, A., Morgado, A., Marques-Silva, J.: PySAT: a python toolkit for prototyping with SAT oracles. In: Beyersdorff, O., Wintersteiger, C.M. (eds.) SAT 2018. LNCS, vol. 10929, pp. 428–437. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94144-8_26

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Heras, F., Morgado, A., Marques-Silva, J.: Core-guided binary search algorithms for maximum satisfiability. In: Burgard, W., Roth, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2011, San Francisco, California, USA, 7–11 August 2011. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bacchus, F., Järvisalo, M., Martins, R.: Max-SAT 2018: Thirteen Max-SAT Evaluation (2018). https://maxsat-evaluations.github.io/2018/

  39. Janota, M., Marques-Silva, J.: On the query complexity of selecting minimal sets for monotone predicates. Artif. Intell. 233, 73–83 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Martins, R., Manquinho, V., Lynce, I.: Open-WBO: a modular MaxSAT solver. In: Sinz, C., Egly, U. (eds.) SAT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8561, pp. 438–445. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09284-3_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Lagniez, J., Le Berre, D., de Lima, T., Montmirail, V.: A recursive shortcut for CEGAR: application to the modal logic K satisfiability problem. In: Sierra, C. (ed.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2017, Melbourne, Australia, 19–25 August 2017, pp. 674–680 (2017). ijcai.org

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of this work was supported by the French Ministry for Higher Education and Research, the Haut-de-France Regional Council through the “Contrat de Plan État Région (CPER) DATA” and by the IDEX UCA\(^{\textsc {jedi}}\).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gael Glorian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Glorian, G., Lagniez, JM., Montmirail, V., Szczepanski, N. (2019). An Incremental SAT-Based Approach to the Graph Colouring Problem. In: Schiex, T., de Givry, S. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11802. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30048-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30048-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30047-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30048-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics