Skip to main content

Methods of Joint Stiffness Measurement Using a Manually Actuated Dynamometer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mechatronics 2019: Recent Advances Towards Industry 4.0 (MECHATRONICS 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1044))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 695 Accesses

Abstract

The methods described provide for quantitative evaluation of skeletal muscles’ passive resistance, also known as muscle stiffness, muscle myotonia or spasticity. They are employed in the quantitative evaluation of muscle groups responsible for angular movements in the elbow joint. The methods, along with the manually actuated dynamometer, represent an alternative to current evaluation methods which are considered inaccurate and subjective. The function of the electronic dynamometer subsystem is to measure angle and torque in the elbow joint. Stiffness can be evaluated by a graph of the torque moment and joint angle in mutual dependence. Since the curve of dependence demonstrates a relation between the torque moment and joint angle is composed of three parts (small, mean, and high angles), three polynomial equations for three regression lines must be calculated. This means that for three regression lines, three values of joint stiffness are obtained. Angular velocity of the rotational movement in a joint is the result of movement affected by a manually controlled lever of dynamometer. No statistically significant difference in joint stiffness values was identified, when comparing values for individual joint stiffness across three different groups of angular velocities; however, when the same comparison was made for small, mean and high angles, a statistically significant difference was identified for all three angular velocities used. The experiments with healthy subjects confirmed, that the torsional moment is dependent on the elbow angle, not on the velocity of the movement. Finding a correlation between a passive moment of force and kinematic angular parameters allows for the study of a complex movement in a joint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Li, F., Wu, Y., Xiong, L.: Reliability of a new scale for measurement of spasticity in stroke patients. J. Rehabil. Med. 48(8), 746–753 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aquin, C.F., Freire, M.T.F., Neves, N.M., Ferreira, P.C.A., Fonseca, S.T.: Analysis of the reliability of a method for measuring hamstring active peak torque angle. Rev. Bras. Fisioter. 11(2), 169–175 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kawakami, Y., Fukunaga, T.: New insights into in vivo human skeletal muscle function. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 34(1), 16–21 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tatsukawa, D.E., Freitas, S.T., Carvalho Abreu, E.M., Dos Reis, M.C., Cunha, B., Moreira Prianti, T., Pupio Silva Lima, F., Oliveira Lima, M.: Muscle torque of healthy individuals and individuals with spastic hemiparesis after passive static stretching. Acta Bioeng. Biomech. 18(1), 35–39 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Menezes Bassan, N., Bertelli Simões, L., Siqueira Cesar, T.E.A., Corrêa Caritá, R.A., Rabello Lima, L.C., Denadai, B., Coelho Greco, C.: Reliability of isometric and isokinetic peak torque of elbow flexors and elbow extensors muscles in trained swimmers. Braz. J. Kinathrop. Hum. Perform. 17(5), 507–516 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hogrel, J.Y., Ollivier, G., Canal, A.: Isometric dynamometry with a Biodex system for the follow-up of patients suffering from LGMD2A (calpainopathy). Neuromuscul. Disord. 19(8–9), 603 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adamova, B., Volf, P., Hybl, J., Kutilek, P., Hejda, J., Viteckova, S., Krivanek, V., Dos-kocil, R., Farlik, J., Smrcka, P.: Semiportable manually actuated system for measuring muscle spasticity. In: IFMBE Proceedings, Volume 68, Issue 2, 2018, pp. 655–658; World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, WC 2018; Prague; Czech Re-public; 3 June 2018 through 8 June 2018; Code 213929

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baker, R.J.: CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, 3rd edn. Wiley IEEE, Hoboken (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson, Glenn R.: Outcome measures of spasticity. Eur. J. Neurol. 9(s1), 10–16 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2002.0090s1010.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pandyan, A.D., Price, C.I.M., Rodgers, H., Barnes, M.P., Johnson, G.R.: Biomechanical examination of a commonly used measure of spasticity. Clin. Biomechanics. 16(10), 859–865 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quesadag, P.M., Pitkin, M., Colvin, J., Srinivasan, R.: Biomechanical evaluation of a prototype foot/ankle prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Rehabil. Eng. 8(1), 156–159 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin, Y.C., Lin, I.L., Chou, T.F., Lee, H.M.: Quantitative evaluation for spasticity of calf muscle after botulinum toxin injection in patients with cerebral palsy: a pilot study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 13(1), 1–11 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was done in the framework of research project SGS17/108/OHK4/1T/17.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Hejda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kutilek, P. et al. (2020). Methods of Joint Stiffness Measurement Using a Manually Actuated Dynamometer. In: Szewczyk, R., Krejsa, J., Nowicki, M., Ostaszewska-LiĹĽewska, A. (eds) Mechatronics 2019: Recent Advances Towards Industry 4.0. MECHATRONICS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1044. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29993-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics