This chapter introduces the concept of learning space in the twenty-first century and considers the various contexts in which learning occurs. The increasing growth of digital educational networking technologies has contributed to the need to create and support various forms of learning spaces. These technologies have also transformed the way students engage and interact off- and online. Contemporary learning, as we know, is no longer limited to physical learning spaces. Instead, students engage in various learning spaces. Others extensively leverage opportunities afforded by social network platforms as tools for collaborative and self-directed learning. Students use social networking technologies to engage with content, connect with peers within their social networks and communicate with their teachers. With the increasing prevalence of these technologies, researchers and educators are provided with new opportunities to extend learning from physical spaces to virtual spaces and optimise pedagogical strategies that can support adaptive learning. Our goal in this chapter is to explore the extent to which understanding of learning spaces and contexts contribute to designing better student engagement and possibly better learning outcomes.
- Learning space
- Learning context
- Context-aware educational technologies
- Educational networking
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
National Research Agency
Computer-supported collaborative learning
Context-Aware Intelligent Tutoring System
Collaborative Distance Learning
Quebec Research Fund in Society and Culture
Intelligent tutoring system
Massive open online course
Technology Enhanced and Teaching in Context
Alterator, S., & Deed, C. (2013). Teacher adaptation to open learning spaces. Issues in Educational Research, 23(3), 315.
Anjou, C., Forissier, T., Bourdeau, J., Mazabraud, Y., Nkambou, R., & Fournier, F. (2017, June). Elaborating the context calculator: A design experiment in geothermy. In International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (pp. 513–526). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Arndt, P. A. (2012). Design of learning spaces: Emotional and cognitive effects of learning environments in relation to child development. Mind, Brain, and Education, 6(1), 41–48.
Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stephan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Google Scholar. Axelrod, S., & Paluska, J.
Bazire, M., & Brézillon, P. (2005, July). Understanding context before using it. In International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (pp. 29–40). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Glesinger Hall, C., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/174879/.
Beemer, J., Spoon, K., He, L., Fan, J., & Levine, R. A. (2018). Ensemble learning for estimating individualized treatment effects in student success studies. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(3), 315–335.
Bennett, S. (2007). First questions for designing higher education learning spaces. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(1), 14–26.
Bettini, C., et al. (2010). A survey of context modelling and reasoning techniques. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2010, 6(2), 161–180.
Biddix, J. P. (2011). “Stepping stones”: Career paths to the SSAO for men and women at four-year institutions. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 48(4), 443–461.
Bourdeau, J. (2017, June). The DBR methodology for the study of context in learning. In International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Modeling and Using Context (pp. 541–553). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Bourdeau, J., Forissier, T., Mazabraud, Y., & Nkambou, R. (2015). Web-based context-aware science learning. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (pp. 1415–1418). Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: Association for Computer Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2743048
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach: Proceedings of the Second Sussex Conference, 1977 (Vol. 722). Springer Science & Business Media. New York, NY, USA.
Brézillon, P. (2011). Context and explanation in e-collaborative work. In B. K. Daniel (Ed.), Handbook of research on methods and techniques for studying virtual communities: Paradigms and phenomena (pp. 285–302). IGI Global. Cambridge, UK.
Brooks, D. C. (2012). Space and consequences: The impact of different formal learning spaces on instructor and student behaviour. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2), n2.
Brown, M. B., & Lippincott, J. K. (2003). Learning spaces: More than meets the eye. Educause Quarterly, 36(1), 14–17.
Chou, C. Y., Lai, K. R., Chao, P. Y., Lan, C. H., & Chen, T. H. (2015). Negotiation based adaptive learning sequences: Combining adaptivity and adaptability. Computers & Education, 88, 215–226.
CIBER Group. (2008). Information behaviour of the researcher of the future (CIBER Briefing paper; 9). London.
Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.
Daniel, B. K. (2017). Enterprise lecture capture technologies and value to student learning. International Journal of Information & Communication Technologies in Education, 6(2), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijicte-2017-0009
Daniel, B. K. (2019). Big data and data science: A critical review of issues for educational research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12595
Deed, C. (2017). Adapting to the virtual campus and transitions in ‘school-less’ teacher education. In D. J. Clandinin & J. Husu (Eds.), Sage international handbook of research in teacher education. London, UK: Sage.
Dey, A. K., Abowd, G. D., & Salber, D. (2001). A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2–4), 97–166.
Ejigu, D., Scuturici, M., & Brunie, L. (2007, March). An ontology-based approach to context modelling and reasoning in pervasive computing. In Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerComW’07) (pp. 14–19). IEEE.
Erstad, O. (2014). The expanded classroom–Spatial relations in classroom practices using ICT. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(01), 8–22.
Fletcher, A. K. (2018). Help seeking: Agentic learners initiating feedback. Educational Review, 70(4), 389–408.
Forissier, T., et al. (2013). Modeling Context Effects in Science Learning: The CLASH Model. In P. Brézillon, P. Blackburn, & R. Dapoigny (Eds.), CONTEXT 2013 (pp. 330–335). Springer. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London, UK: Routledge.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
Griffith, J., Vercellotti, M. L., & Folkers, H. (2019). What is in a question? A comparison of student questions in two learning spaces. Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & Disorders, 3(1), 7.
Hong, H. Y., Scardamalia, M., Messina, R., & Teo, C. L. (2015). Fostering sustained idea improvement with principle-based knowledge building analytic tools. Computers & Education, 89, 91–102. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131515001207
Hood, N., Littlejohn, A., & Milligan, C. (2015). Context counts: How learners’ contexts influence learning in a MOOC. Computers & Education, 91, 83–91.
Hung, H. T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703–714.
Jansen, B. A. (2010). Internet filtering 2.0: Checking intellectual freedom and participative practices at the schoolhouse door. Knowledge Quest, 39(1), 46–54.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171478/.
Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., & Firtova, L. (2018, June). Learning Analytics in the Classroom: Comparing Self-assessment, Teacher Assessment and Tests. In International Conference in Methodologies and intelligent Systems for Techhnology Enhanced Learning (pp. 131–138). Springer, Cham.
Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., & Siemens, G. (2017). Digital learning design framework for social learning spaces. In Joint Proceedings of the Workshop on Methodology in Learning Analytics (MLA) and the Workshop on Building the Learning Analytics Curriculum (BLAC) co-located with 7th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK 2017). Central Europe.
Lavoué, É., Molinari, G., Prié, Y., & Khezami, S. (2015). Reflection-in-action markers for reflection-on-action in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning settings. Computers & Education, 88, 129–142.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lin, J. W., & Lin, H. C. K. (2019). User acceptance in a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment with social network awareness (SNA) support. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 100–115.
Matthews, K. E., Andrews, V., & Adams, P. (2011). Social learning spaces and student engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 105–120.
Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2014). Learning with big data: The future of education. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
McCarthy, J. (1993). Notes on formalizing context. Proceeding IJCAI’93 Proceedings of the 13th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 555–560). Chambery, France — August 28 - September 03, 1993.
Milne, A. J. (2006). Designing blended learning space to the student experience. In Learning spaces. Washington, DC: Educause.
Miraoui, M. A (2018). Context-aware smart classroom for enhanced learning environment. Retrieved on 23 Oct 2019 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6491/f9ce8a0f3d6b036fa02322ac0c3b4d3a0406.pdf.
Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Martínez-Monés, A., Prieto, L. P., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015, September). Bucket-Server: A system for including teacher-controlled flexibility in the management of learning artefacts in across-spaces learning situations. Paper presented at the Tenth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2015), Toledo, Spain.
Muñoz-Cristóbal, J. A., Gallego-Lema, V., Arribas-Cubero, H. F., Martínez-Monés, A., & Asensio-Pérez, J. I. (2017). Using virtual learning environments in bricolage mode for orchestrating learning situations across physical and virtual spaces. Computers & Education, 109, 233–252.
Munoz-Cristobal, J. A., Prieto, L. P., Asensio-Perez, J. I., Jorrín-Abellán, I. M., Martínez-Mones, A., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2013, September). Sharing the burden: Introducing student-centred orchestration in across-spaces learning situations. In Paper Presented at the 8th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL), Paphos, Cyprus.
Oblinger, D. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 8. Retrieved 23 Oct 2019 from https://www-jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2004-8-oblinger/.
Oblinger, D. (2005). Leading the transition from classrooms to learning spaces. Educause Quarterly, 28(1), 14–18.
Oblinger, D., & Lippincott, J. K. (2006). Learning spaces. Boulder, Colo,.: EDUCAUSE, c2006. 1 v.(various pagings): illustrations. Retrieved on 23 Oct 2019 from http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1077&context=bookshel.
Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st-century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265–279.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the horizon, 9(5) (pp. 1–6). UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Psyché V., Anjou C., Fenani W., Bourdeau J., Forissier T., & Nkambou R. (2018). Ontology-Based Context Modelling for Designing a Context-Aware Calculator. Workshop on Context and Culture in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2018.
Ramsay, C. M., Guo, X., & Pursel, B. K. (2017). Leveraging faculty reflective practice to understand active learning spaces: Flashbacks and re-captures. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 42–53.
Schwartz, D. L., Lin, X., Brophy, S., & Bransford, J. D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 183–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schwier, R. A., Morrison, D., & Daniel, B. K. (2009). A preliminary investigation of self-directed learning activities in a non-formal blended learning environment. Online Submission. Available https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509957.pdf
Scott, K. S., Sorokti, K. H., & Merrell, J. D. (2016). Learning “beyond the classroom” within an enterprise social network system. The Internet and Higher Education, 29, 75–90. Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
Selman, G., Cooke, M., Selman, M., & Dampier, P. (1998). The foundations of adult education in Canada (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Thompson Educational Publishing.
Selwyn, N. (2012). Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: The role of sociological theory. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 81–96.
Smith, C. (2017). The influence of hierarchy and layout geometry in the design of learning spaces. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 59–67.
Sottilare, R. A., Baker, R. S., Graesser, A. C., & Lester, J. C. (2018). Special Issue on the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT): Creating a stable and flexible platform for Innovations in AIED research. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(2), 139–151.
Starr-Glass, D. (2018). Building learning spaces. In Online course management: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (p. 241). Pennsylvania, USA: IGI Global. Hershey.
Stockless, A. (2018). Digital education: learning by opening the walls of the class. Revue Internationale sur le numérique en éducation et communication, revue-mediations.teluq.ca, 1(1), P3–P5. Retrieved on 06-02-2019 from https://revue-mediations.teluq.ca/index.php/Distances/article/view/63/31
Temple, P. (2008). Learning spaces in higher education: An under-researched topic. London Review of Education, 6(3), 229–241.
Thomas, H. (2010). Learning spaces, learning environments and the dis ‘placement’ of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 502–511.
Van Leeuwen, A., Janssen, J., Erkens, G., & Brekelmans, M. (2014). Supporting teachers in guiding collaborating students: Effects of learning analytics in CSCL. Computers & Education, 79, 28–39.
VanLehn, K. (2016). Regulative loops, step loops and task loops. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(1), 107–112.
Vercellotti, M. L. (2018). Do interactive learning spaces increase student achievement? A comparison of the classroom context. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 197–210.
Wilson, G., & Randall, M. (2012). The implementation and evaluation of a new learning space: A pilot study. Research in Learning Technology, 20(2), 1–17.
Woolf, B. P. (2010). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Morgan Kaufmann. Burlington, MA, USA.
Xi, L., Yuan, Z., Yun Qui, B., & Chiang, F. K. (2017). An investigation of university students’ classroom seating choices. Journal of Learning Spaces, 6(3), 13–22.
We want to thank Roger Nkambou for the CAITS architecture, Christine Richard for the figure of the learning scenario and the whole team of the TEEC project for providing the foundations as well as the experimentations of Context-Aware Collaborative Learning Systems. We also thank the following research funding agencies for supporting our work: ANR and FRQSC.
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Psyché, V., Daniel, B.K., Bourdeau, J. (2020). Learning Spaces in Context-Aware Educational Networking Technologies in the Digital Age. In: Peña-Ayala, A. (eds) Educational Networking. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29973-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29972-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29973-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)