Skip to main content

Mitchell v. Wisconsin on Blood Alcohol Tests Under the Fourth Amendment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
SCOTUS 2019
  • 150 Accesses

Abstract

The Fourth Amendment protects individuals against unreasonable searches by the state without a warrant. The Court has long struggled with questions of what constitutes a search and under what circumstances the acquisition of a warrant by police is an unreasonable hurdle to legitimate safety concerns of the public. Mitchell asks these questions in the context of drawing a blood alcohol test from an unconscious driver. One side argues that drivers have provided implied consent when signing up for a license in order to protect the entire public from harm, while the other side argues that such a personal bodily invasion is not allowed under the Fourth Amendment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 22.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A plurality opinion is the controlling judgment when a majority of Justices agree on the outcome but not on the justification or reasoning; only a smaller number—the plurality—offer an opinion that explains the Court’s position, which may limit the power of the ruling.

  2. 2.

    Birchfield v. North Dakota, 579 U.S. ___ (2016).

  3. 3.

    Missouri v. McNeely, 569 U.S. 141 (2013).

  4. 4.

    Schmerber v. California, 383 U.S. 757 (1966).

  5. 5.

    Mitchell decision, page 10.

  6. 6.

    Ibid., page 11 (quoting McNeely, 169).

  7. 7.

    Ibid., page 8 (quoting McNeely, 149).

  8. 8.

    Ibid., page 9.

  9. 9.

    Ibid., page 13.

  10. 10.

    Ibid.

  11. 11.

    Ibid., page 15.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., page 16.

  13. 13.

    Ibid.

  14. 14.

    Mitchell Thomas concurrence, page 1.

  15. 15.

    Mitchell Sotomayor dissent, page 11.

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Ibid., page 13.

  18. 18.

    Ibid., page 18.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela C. Corley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Corley, P.C. (2020). Mitchell v. Wisconsin on Blood Alcohol Tests Under the Fourth Amendment. In: Klein, D., Marietta, M. (eds) SCOTUS 2019. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29956-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics