Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Knowledge Management: Theories and Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Connecting Adult Learning and Knowledge Management

Part of the book series: Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning ((IAKM,volume 8))

Abstract

Knowledge management is an age-old activity, yet it has only been identified and named for just over 30 years. This chapter will review the theories and practices that have developed under that name. Although the majority of knowledge management work has been done in a corporate context, its theories cover the whole range from the individual level to that of nations or even the entire human race. As the theme of this book is connecting adult learning and knowledge management, this chapter will place its emphasis on the links between knowledge management and learning and on the area known as personal knowledge management. These emphases mean the chapter will concentrate on theories from the “knowledge as knowing” or “knowledge as process” stream of literature, as opposed to the “knowledge as object” school.

Turning to knowledge management practices, these will be discussed using the three aspects of people, process, and technology. These go together to make up any particular knowledge management initiative, although typically one of them leads. Thus, in a learning initiative within an organization, we might see a focus on mentoring (leading on the people aspect), or support for further external study/qualifications (process) or e-learning (technology).

One aspect we observe in the literature where knowledge management meets education is that there is more often an emphasis on the supply side (teachers, professors, and trainers) rather than on the demand side (learners, students).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APQC. (2018). APQC’s knowledge flow process framework. Retrieved from https://www.apqc.org/knowledge-base/download/277408

  • Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., & Miron-Spektor, E. (2011). Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science, 22(5), 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azan, W., Bootz, J.-P., & Rolland, O. (2017). Community of practices, knowledge transfer, and ERP project (ERPP). Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41275-017-0047-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, S., Grinnall, A., & Williams, D. (2015). What have we learned so far? The development and application of an organisational learning narrative. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canonico, P., Consiglio, S., De Nito, E., Esposito, V., & Pezzillo Iacono, M. (2018). Dealing with knowledge in a product development setting: An empirical analysis in the automotive industry. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16(1), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1428068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaneda, D. I., Manrique, L. F., & Cuellar, S. (2018). Is organizational learning being absorbed by knowledge management? A systematic review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(2), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2017-0041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, E., & Clarke, S. (Eds.). (2006). Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, N. A. D. (2003). Book review: The new knowledge management—Complexity, learning and sustainable innovation. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 64–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. (2007). Reproducing knowledge: Xerox and the story of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 5(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. E. (2005). Clearing up “implicit knowledge”: Implications for knowledge management, information science, psychology, and social epistemology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(6), 630–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, P. A. (2001). Personal knowledge management: Educational framework for global business. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20080906190602/http://www.millikin.edu/pkm/pkm_istanbul.html

  • Dulipovici, A., & Baskerville, R. (2015). An education model of disciplinary emergence: The ripples of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(2), 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durst, S., & Zieba, M. (2019). Mapping knowledge risks: Towards a better understanding of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2018.1538603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. S. (2000). Artificial intelligence and knowledge management: How much difference can it really make? Paper presented at the KMAC2000. Knowledge management beyond the hype: Looking towards the new millennium, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. S. (2005). Business processes and knowledge management. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (Vol. I, pp. 350–355). Hershey, PA: Idea.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. S. (2016). Systems for knowledge management along the supply chain. In S. Joshi & R. Joshi (Eds.), Designing and implementing global supply chain management (pp. 92–104). Hershey, PA: IGI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, V., & Sune, A. (2009). Organizational forgetting and its causes: An empirical research. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 22(6), 620–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810910997032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fini, A. (2009). The technological dimension of a massive open online course: The case of the CCK08 course tools. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, J. M., & McElroy, M. W. (2003). Key issues in the new knowledge management. Amsterdam: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frand, J., & Hixon, C. (1999). Personal knowledge management: Who, what, why, when, where, how? (Working paper). Los Angeles: Anderson School of Management, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamo-Sanchez, A.-L., & Cegarra-Navarro, J.-G. (2015). Factors that influence the success of a KM-program in a small-sized airport. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(3), 593–610. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-02-2015-0052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Penalvo, F. J., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Lytras, M. D. (2012). Informal learning in work environments: Training with the Social Web in the workplace. Behaviour & Information Technology, 31(8), 753–755. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2012.661548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handzic, M., & Durmic, N. (2014). Merging knowledge management with project management. In C. Vivas & P. Sequeira (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th European conference on knowledge management (pp. 402–409).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannabuss, S. (2000). Narrative knowledge: Eliciting organisational knowledge from storytelling. Aslib Proceedings, 52(10), 402–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisig, P. (2009). Harmonisation of knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910971798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisig, P., Adekunle, S. O., Kianto, A., Kemboi, C., Perez-Arrau, G., & Easa, N. (2016). Knowledge management and business performance: Global experts’ views on future research needs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 1169–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, N. L. (1974). Knowledge management: A new concern for public administration. Public Administration Review, 34(3), 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkpen, A. (1996). Creating knowledge through collaboration. California Management Review, 39(1), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, J. B., & Edwards, J. S. (2000, October 26–27). Fast moving global demand led supply chains: How organisational learning may offer bridges in crossing cultures. Paper presented at the first European conference on knowledge management, Bled, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. E. D. (2002). The third stage of KM emerges. KMWorld, 11, 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krylova, K., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2016). Knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive organizations: The crucial role of improvisation in transferring and protecting knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(5), 1045–1064. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2015-0385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. C. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, L., & Sune, A. (2013). Turnover-induced forgetting and its impact on productivity. British Journal of Management, 24(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00785.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, Y. (2000). From information management to knowledge management: Beyond the ‘Hi-tech hidebound’ systems. In K. Srikantaiah & M. E. D. Koenig (Eds.), Knowledge management for the information professional (pp. 37–61). Medford, NJ: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manasia, L. (2013). The impact of social software on developing communities of practice to enhance adult learning. In I. Roceanu, I. Stanescu, & D. Barbieru (Eds.), Quality and efficiency in E-learning, Vol 2 (pp. 598–603). Bucharest: Carol I National Defence University Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1999). The pursuit of organizational intelligence. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N., & Brady, T. (2001). Knowledge management and the politics of knowledge: Illustrations from complex products and systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 10(2), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & O’Driscoll, T. M. (2002). Knowledge management in pursuit of performance: Insights from Nortel Networks. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, S., & Edwards, J. S. (2017). Implementing a knowledge management system within an NHS Hospital: A case study exploring the roll-out of an Electronic Patient Record (EPR). Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2015.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, M. W. (1999). The second generation of knowledge management. Knowledge Management, 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, M. W. (2002). The new knowledge management: Complexity, learning, and sustainable innovation. Amsterdam: KMCI/Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oluikpe, P. (2012). Developing a corporate knowledge management strategy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6), 862–878. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211276164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press/Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshri, I., Pan, S. L., & Newell, S. (2005). Trade-offs between knowledge exploitation and exploration activities. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 3(1), 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrillo, T. (2015). Disruptive trends in adult learning and knowledge management: An exploration into the value of micro-credentialing and digital badging. In L. Gomez Chova, A. Lopez Martinez & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Edulearn15: 7th international conference on education and new learning technologies (pp. 6755–6760).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State of New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. D., & Argote, L. (2006). Organizational learning and forgetting: The effects of turnover and structure. European Management Review, 3(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedziuviene, N., & Vveinhardt, J. (2009). The paradigm of knowledge management in higher educational institutions. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 65, 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrme, D. J. (1999). Knowledge networking: Creating the collaborative enterprise. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedley, J. (2009). Modelling personal knowledge management. OR Insight, 22(4), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2009.11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. J. (2000). Cynefin, a sense of time and place: An ecological approach to sense making and learning in formal and informal communities. Paper presented at the KMAC2000. Knowledge management beyond the hype: Looking towards the new millennium, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. J. (2002). Complex acts of knowing: Paradox and descriptive self-awareness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210424639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. D. (2001). Complex responsive processes in organisations: Learning and knowledge creation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K., & Lloyd, T. (1987). Managing know-how. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G., Ringov, D., & Jensen, R. J. (2016). Overcoming stickiness: How the timing of knowledge transfer methods affects transfer difficulty. Organization Science, 27(2), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trees, L. (2016). Accelerators of knowledge management maturity: Insights from APQC’s KM capability assessment tool (pp. 58). Houston, TX: APQC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truch, E. (2001). Managing personal knowledge: The key to tomorrow’s employability. Journal of Change Management, 2(2), 102–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorakulpipat, C., & Rezgui, Y. (2006). From knowledge sharing to value creation: Three generations of knowledge management. Paper presented at the 2006 IEEE international engineering management conference, Salvador, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, K. M. (1997). Knowledge management: Where did it come from and where will it go? Expert Systems with Applications, 13(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. (2005). Personal knowledge management: Supporting individual knowledge worker performance. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 3(3), 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ying, W., Pee, L. G., & Jia, S. (2018). Social informatics of intelligent manufacturing ecosystems: A case study of KuteSmart. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 102–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaghab, R. W., Maldonado, C., Whitehead, D., Bartlett, F., & de Bittner, M. R. (2015). Online continuing education for health professionals: Does sticky design promote practice-relevance? Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(6), 466–474.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aston University, Birmingham, UK

    John S. Edwards

Authors
  1. John S. Edwards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John S. Edwards .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Padua, Padua, Italy

    Monica Fedeli

  2. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

    Laura L. Bierema

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Edwards, J.S. (2019). Knowledge Management: Theories and Practices. In: Fedeli, M., Bierema, L.L. (eds) Connecting Adult Learning and Knowledge Management. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29872-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29872-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29871-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29872-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation