Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Linking Faculty to Organization Development and Change: Teaching4Learning@Unipd

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Connecting Adult Learning and Knowledge Management

Part of the book series: Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning ((IAKM,volume 8))

Abstract

Faculty development is intricately connected with organization development and change. Most of the research on faculty development focuses on faculty teaching effectiveness and faculty personal and professional development. The instructor remains the only unit of analysis, with little attention given to the actions and strategies to develop the organization in order to foster excellent teaching while building strong communities of learning. Further, research on faculty development overlooks how to create a culture of innovation, fails to identify the impact of faculty development programs on the organization, and neglects the organizational implications of promoting teaching innovation.

The aim of this chapter is to demonstrate that faculty development, and in particular the program Teaching4Learning@Unipd, could not be realized without a strong institutional commitment to develop and change and to invest money and energy in the innovation process.

Faculty development in this sense can become a means and an opportunity to develop old and prestigious institutions like the University of Padova, involving all different actors at different levels of the organization: personally, and in group, through the building of faculty learning community (FLC) (Adams and Mix, AILACTE J 11:37–56; Cox, New Dir Teach Learn 97(97):5–23, 2004; Int J Acad Dev 1324(September):1–13, 2013; Stanley, Arts Educ Policy Rev 112(2):71–78, 2011).

This chapter aims to address the following questions: What are the challenges of promoting faculty development at a big Italian university? How can faculty development impact organization development and change? Which strategic actions and practices most effectively promote change? What are future opportunities to develop research and practices linked to faculty and organization development?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, S. R., & Mix, E. K. (2014). Taking the lead in faculty development: Teacher educators changing the culture of university faculty development through collaboration. AILACTE Journal, 11, 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D. L. (2016). Organization development. The process of leading organizational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelique, H., Kyle, K., & Taylor, E. W. (2002). Mentors and muses: New strategies for academic success. Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamford, D., & Forrester, P. (2003). Managing planned and emergent change within an operations management environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(5), 546–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckhard, R. (1969). Organization development: Strategies and models. Reading, MA: Adison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierema, L. (2014). Organization development: An action research approach. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolisani, E., & Bratianu, C. (2018). Emergent knowledge strategies. Strategic thinking in knowledge management. Swiss: Springer International.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee, K. A. (1987). The art of collaborative learning. Change, 19(2), 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W. W. (2010). Il cambiamento organizzativo: Teoria e pratica. Milano: FrancoAngeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, W. W. (2011). A perspective on the field of organization development and change: The Zeigarnik effect. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 47(2), 143–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 977–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. D. (2004). Introduction to faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 97, 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, M. D. (2013). The impact of communities of practice in support of early-career academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 1324(September), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, C. J. (2011). Faculty learning communities: Addressing the professional development needs of faculty and the learning needs of students. Currents in Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, A., & Palmer, E. (2009). Mentoring circles in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(2), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirkx, J., & Serbati, A. (2017). Promoting faculty professional development: Strategies for individual and collective reflection towards institutional change. In E. Felisatti & A. Serbati (Eds.), Preparare alla professionalità docente e innovare la didattica universitaria (pp. 21–38). Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). Supporting growth and jobs—An agenda for the modernisation of Europe’s higher education systems. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/education/library/policy/modernisation_en.pdf

  • European Commission. (2013). Report to the European Commission on improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe’s higher education institutions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • European University Association. (2018). A positive learning and teaching climate through the continuous development of teaching competences. Retrieved from https://eua.eu/resources/expert-voices/71:a-positive-learning-and-teaching-climate-through-the-continuous-development-of-teaching-competences.html

  • Fedeli, M. (2016). Coinvolgere gli studenti nelle pratiche didattiche: potere, dialogo e partecipazione. In M. Fedeli, V. Grion, & D. Frison (Eds.), Coinvolgere per apprendere. Metodi e tecniche partecipative per la formazione (pp. 113–142). Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedeli, M., Frison, D., & Grion, V. (2017). Fostering learner-centered teaching in higher education. In V. Boffo, M. Fedeli, F. Lo Presti, C. Melacarne, & M. Vianello (Eds.), Teaching and learning for employability. New strategies in higher education (pp. 89–115). Milan: Pearson Italia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedeli, M., & Taylor, E. W. (2016). Exploring the impact of a teacher study group in an Italian university. Formazione & Insegnamento, XIV(3), 2279–7505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, R. (2001). Constructivism examined. Oxford Review of Education, 27(1), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, D. (2014). Collaborative peer-supported review of teaching. In J. Sachs & M. Parsell (Eds.), Peer review of learning and teaching in higher education (Professional learning and development in schools and higher education) (Vol. 9). Dordrecht: Springer, Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Student relationship at university: An important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 40(3), 370–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, E. (2014). Toward using relevant collegial contexts for academic development. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15(3), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbeche, L. (2006). Understanding change: Theory, implementation and success. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, C. M., & Kozlowski, K. A. (2014). Faculty experiences in a research learning community. Journal of Faculty Development, 28(2), 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D. M., & McNamee, S. (Eds.). (2006). The social construction of organization. Herndon, VA: Copenhagen Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K., & Aiyegbayo, O. (2011). Peer observation of teaching: Exploring the experiences of academic staff at the University of Huddersfield. Working paper. Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahut, G. F., Burnap, C., & Yon, M. G. (2007). Peer observation of teaching: Perception of the observer and the observed. College Teaching, 55(1), 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livne-Tarandach, R., & Bartunek, J. M. (2009). A new horizon for organizational change and development scholarship: Connecting planned and emergent change. In R. W. Woodman, W. A. Pasmore, & A. B. Rami Shani (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 17, pp. 1–35). Bingley: Emerald Group.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, J., Bell, S., Bohan, J., Brown, A., Burke, J., Cogdell, B., & Tierney, A. (2010). From anxiety to empowerment: A learning community of university teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(3), 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, D., & Monsen, S. (2015, March 27). Peer observation of teaching. A discussion paper prepared for the peer observation of teaching colloquium. Institute for Teaching and Learning Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministero dell’Istruzione della Ricerca e dell’Università. (2016). Autovalutazione valutazione, accreditamento iniziale e periodico delle sedi e dei corsi di studio universitari. Decreto Ministeriale 978 del 12 dicembre 2016. Retrieved from http://attiministeriali.miur.it/anno-2016/dicembre/dm-12122016.aspx

  • Myers, P., Hulks, S., & Wiggins, L. (2012). Organizational change: Perspectives on theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, F., & Peed-Neal, I. (2010). Promoting your program and grounding it in the institution. In K. J. Gillespie, D. L. Robertson, & Associates (Eds.), A guide to faculty development (2nd ed., pp. 99–115). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, J. S., Reardon, R. M., Smith, F. G., Rhodes, J. A., Zander, M. J., & Carter, T. J. (2008). Exploring faculty learning communities: Building connections among teaching, learning, and technology. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E. E., & Eoyang, G. H. (2001). Facilitating organization change: Lessons from complexity science. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlitz, S. A., Connor, M. O., Pang, Y., Stryker, D., Markell, S., Krupp, E., & Redfern, A. K. (2009). Developing a culture of assessment through a faculty learning community: A case study. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 133–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherer, P., Shea, T., & Kristensen, E. (2003). Online communities of practice: A catalyst for faculty development. Innovative Higher Education, 27(3), 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, A. M. (2011). Professional development within collaborative teacher study groups: Pitfalls and promises. Arts Education Policy Review, 112(2), 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturko, P. A., & Gregson, J. A. (2008). Learning and collaboration in professional development for career and technical education teachers: A qualitative multi-case study. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 45(3), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanwick, T. (2008). See one, do one, then what? Faculty development in postgraduate medical education. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 84(993), 339–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. W. (2007). An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. R. (2016). Fostering transformative learning. In M. Fedeli, V. Grion, & D. Frison (Eds.), Coinvolgere per apprendere. Metodi e tecniche partecipative per la formazione (pp. 113–142). Lecce: Pensa Multimedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todnem By, R. (2005). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosi, L. H., & Pilati, M. (2008). Comportamento organizzativo. Attori, relazioni, organizzazione, management. Milano: EGEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, T. M., Hable, M. P., Preston, M. M., & Magliaro, S. G. (2000). Faculty study groups: Solving “good problems” through study, reflection, and collaboration. Innovative Higher Education, 24(4), 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zara, V. (2017). Prefazione. In E. Felisatti & A. Serbati (Eds.), Preparare alla professionalità docente e innovare la didattica universitaria (pp. 9–10). Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Padova, Padova, Italy

    Monica Fedeli

Authors
  1. Monica Fedeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Fedeli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Padua, Padua, Italy

    Monica Fedeli

  2. University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

    Laura L. Bierema

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fedeli, M. (2019). Linking Faculty to Organization Development and Change: Teaching4Learning@Unipd. In: Fedeli, M., Bierema, L.L. (eds) Connecting Adult Learning and Knowledge Management. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29872-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29872-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29871-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29872-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation