Advertisement

Early Within-Season Yield Prediction and Disease Detection Using Sentinel Satellite Imageries and Machine Learning Technologies in Biomass Sorghum

  • Ephrem HabyarimanaEmail author
  • Isabelle Piccard
  • Christian Zinke-Wehlmann
  • Paolo De Franceschi
  • Marcello Catellani
  • Michela Dall’Agata
Conference paper
  • 207 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11771)

Abstract

Sorghum is grown for several purposes including biomass for producing energy and fodder, and grain for producing health-promoting foods. Sorghum is a drought resistant cereal with low input requirements, making it one of the most promising crops under the world’s tropics and higher latitudes. Crop monitoring, one of the leading activities in smart farming, can help cut production costs and more so under climate change. In this study, Sentinel 2A and 2B-derived fAPAR and NDVI data were used to monitor sorghum phenology, foliar diseases, and to predict aboveground biomass yields months before harvest, using machine learning approaches including Bayesian methods and region-convolutional neural network. The results obtained in this work were encouraging. We were able to predict biomass yields up to 6 months before harvest with mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) < 0.2, while diseases were detected with accuracy up to 90%. The best machine learning algorithm was Bayesian additive regression trees (bartMachine method), while the best biomass yields prediction regressors were the days of year 150 and 165. These results were achieved at a Pilot level and the technologies showed industrial scale implementation potentials with tremendous benefits for the farmer, extension services, policy makers, and other parties at interest.

Keywords

Sorghum biomass Sorghum diseases Prediction modeling Machine learning Bayesian learning NDVI and fAPAR Satellite imagery Sentinel-2 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Part of this work was supported (beneficiary: first author) by the project Data-driven Bioeconomy (www.databio.eu), GA number: 732064 (H2020-ICT-2016-1—innovation action), and the project Risorse GeneticheVegetali (RGV/FAO) 2014e2016 of the Ministero delle PoliticheAgricole, Alimentari e Forestali, Rome.

References

  1. 1.
    Habyarimana, E., Lorenzoni, C., Redaelli, R., Alfieri, M., Amaducci, S., Cox, S.: Towards a perennial biomass sorghum crop: a comparative investigation of biomass yields and overwintering of Sorghum bicolorx S. halepense lines relative to long term S. bicolor trials in northern Italy. Biomass Bioenergy 111, 187–195 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    El Bassam, N.: Handbook of Bioenergy Crops: A Complete Reference to Species, Development and Applications. Earthscan Ltd., London (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stefaniak, T.R., Dahlberg, J.A., Bean, B.W., Dighe, N., Wolfrum, E.J., Rooney, W.L.: Variation in biomass composition components among forage, biomass, sorghum-sudangrass, and sweet sorghum types. Crop Sci. 52, 1949–1954 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gallego, J., Kravchenko, A.N., Kussul, N.N., Skakun, S.V., Shelestov, A.Y., Grypych, Y.A.: Efficiency assessment of different approaches to crop classification based on satellite and ground observations. J. Autom. Inf. Sci. 44, 67–80 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diouf, A.A., et al.: Fodder biomass monitoring in Sahelian rangelands using phenological metrics from FAPAR time series. Remote Sens. 7, 9122–9148 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70709122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shafian, S., et al.: Unmanned aerial systems-based remote sensing for monitoring sorghum growth and development. PLoS ONE 13, e0196605 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kross, A., McNairn, H., Lapen, D., Sunohara, M., Champagne, C.: Assessment of RapidEye vegetation indices for estimation of leaf area index and biomass in corn and soybean crops. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 34, 235–248 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panda, S.S., Ames, D.P., Panigrahi, S.: Application of vegetation indices for agricultural crop yield prediction using neural network techniques. Remote Sens. 2, 673–696 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    López-Lozano, R., Duveiller, G., Seguini, L., Meroni, M., García-Condado, S., Hooker, J.: Towards regional grain yield forecasting with 1 km-resolution EO biophysical products: strengths and limitations at pan-European level. Agric. For. Meteorol. 206, 12–32 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kussul, N., Kolotii, A., Skakun, S., Shelestov, A., Kussul, O., Oliynuk, T.: Efficiency estimation of different satellite data usage for winter wheat yield forecasting in Ukraine. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Quebec City, Canada (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duveiller, G., López-Lozano, R., Baruth, B.: Enhanced processing of 1-km spatial resolution fAPAR time series for sugarcane yield forecasting and monitoring. Remote Sens. 5(3), 1091–1116 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang, C., Everitt, J.H., Bradford, J.M., Escobar, D.E.: Mapping grain sorghum growth and yield variations using airborne multispectral digital imagery. Trans. ASAE 43, 1927–1938 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Habyarimana, E., Piccard, I., Catellani, M., De Franceschi, P., Dall’Agata, M.: Towards predictive modeling of sorghum biomass yields using fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation derived from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery and supervised machine learning techniques. Agronomy 9, 203 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rumpf, T., Mahlein, A.-K., Steiner, U., Oerke, E.-C., Dehne, H.-W., Plümer, L.: Early detection and classification of plant diseases with Support Vector Machines based on hyperspectral reflectance. Comput. Electron. Agric. 74(1), 91–99 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.12.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang, C., Everitt, J.H., Murde, D.: Evaluating high resolution SPOT 5 satellite imagery for crop identification. Comput. Electron. Agric. 75(2), 347–354 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.12.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Keukelaere, L., et al.: Atmospheric correction of Landsat-8/OLI and Sentinel-2/MSI data using iCOR algorithm: validation for coastal and inland waters. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 51, 525–542 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weiss, M., Baret, F.: ATBD S2ToolBox Level 2 Products: LAI, FAPAR, FCOVER (Version 1.1). http://step.esa.int/docs/extra/ATBD_S2ToolBox_L2B_V1.1.pdf. Accessed 04 May 2019
  18. 18.
    Kuhn, M.: Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J. Stat. Softw. 28, 1–26 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jost, Z.: “Bayesian Additive Regression Trees” paper summary. https://towardsdatascience.com/bayesian-additive-regression-trees-paper-summary-9da19708fa71. Accessed 04 May 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ephrem Habyarimana
    • 1
    Email author
  • Isabelle Piccard
    • 2
  • Christian Zinke-Wehlmann
    • 3
  • Paolo De Franceschi
    • 1
  • Marcello Catellani
    • 1
    • 4
  • Michela Dall’Agata
    • 1
  1. 1.CREA Research Center for Cereal and Industrial CropsFoggiaItaly
  2. 2.Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek N.V.MolBelgium
  3. 3.Institute for Applied InformaticsLeipzigGermany
  4. 4.Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic DevelopmentRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations