Skip to main content

Digital Forwarders

A Market Oriented Taxonomy

Part of the Lecture Notes in Logistics book series (LNLO)

Abstract

Digital forwarders are a rather new phenomenon in the logistics market. They claim benefits for shippers and freight carriers alike and threaten established players in the market. As a lot of digital forwarders are still situated in a start-up phase, the phenomenon has not yet arrived thoroughly in scientific discussions. Digital forwarders are not necessarily alike each other but try to cover various market segments. To enable a profound analysis of digital forwarders, this paper presents an empirically based taxonomy to serve as a starting point for both theoretical and practical discussions. The taxonomy was created through an iterative process by analyzing major digital forwarders in the market. The taxonomy consists of three major types within the digital forwarding market, being international full service, direct contract trucking and niche digital forwarder.

Keywords

  • Digitization
  • Freight forwarder
  • Taxonomy
  • Platform
  • Logistics
  • Disruptive innovation

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29821-0_2
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-29821-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The corresponding legal framework and definitions can be found in §453-466 HGB for the German market and Title 49 U.S.C. §13102 for the US market.

References

  1. Bengtsson, M., Kock, S.: Coopetition in business networks-to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industr. Market. Manag. 29(5), 411–426 (2000). ISSN: 0019-8501

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Bierwirth, C., Schneider, S., Kopfer, H.: Elektronische Transportmärkte Aufgaben, Entwicklungsstand und Gestaltungsoptionen. Wirtschaftsinformatik 44(4), 335–344 (2002). ISSN: 1861-8936

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohács, G., Frikker, I., Kovács, G.: Intermodal logistics processes supported by electronic freight and warehouse exchanges. Transp. Telecommun. 14(3), 206–213 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boston Consulting Group. The digital imperative in freight forwarding. https://www.bcg.com/de-de/publications/2018/digital-imperative-freight-orwarding.aspx. Accessed 29 May 2019

  5. Bundesvereinigung Logistik (BVL): Positionspapier Digitalisierung. https://www.bcg.com/de-de/publications/2018/digital-imperative-freight-forwarding.aspx. Accessed 29 May 2019

  6. Caplice, C.: Electronic markets for truckload transportation. Prod. Oper. Manage. 16(4), 423–436 (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Chesbrough, H.: Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan. 43(2–3), 354–363 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Convoy. https://convoy.com/. Accessed 29 May 2019

  9. Crunchbase - List of top Logistics Startups. https://www.crunchbase.com/hub/logistics-startups. Accessed 29 May 2019

  10. Dietrich, A., Fiege, F.: Digitale Transformation des Speditionsgeschäfts umfasst mehr als Spedition 4.0. Wirtschaftsinformatik Manage. 9(3), 36–45 (2017)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. DVZ - Digitale Forwarder brauchen langen Atem. https://www.dvz.de/rubriken/logistik/detail/news/digital-forwarders-brauchen-langen-atem.html. Accessed 29 May 2019

  12. FlexPort. https://de.flexport.com/. Accessed 29 May 2019

  13. FreightHub. https://freighthub.com/de/. Accessed 29 May 2019

  14. Gimpel, H., Rau, D., Röglinger, M.: Understanding in-Tech start-ups - a taxonomy of consumer-oriented service offerings. Electron. Markets 28(3), 245–264 (2018). ISSN: 1422-8890

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q. 30(3), 611–642 (2006). ISSN: 02767783

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hartmann, P.M., et al.: Capturing value from big data-a taxonomy of data-driven business models used by start-up firms. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 36(10), 1382–1406 (2016)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Hofmann, E., Osterwalder, F.: Third-party logistics providers in the digital age: towards a new competitive arena? Logistics 1(2) (2017). ISSN: 2305-6290

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kille, C., et al.: Digitalisierungswerkzeuge in der Logistik: Einsatzpotenziale, Reifegrad und Wertbeitrag, September 2018. ISBN: 9783736998797

    Google Scholar 

  19. Knowler, G.: Downplaying digital disruption: established forwarders confident they have what it takes to keep customers happy. J. Commer. 19(9), 15–16 (2018). ISSN: 15423867

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kovács, G.: The structure, modules, services, and operational process of modern electronic freight and warehouse exchanges. Periodica Polytechnica Transp. Eng. 37(1–2), 33–38 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurpjuweit, S., Wagner, S., Greil, T.: The rise of logistics startups and their impact on the logistics industry. In: 2018 25th EurOMA Conference (Budapest, Hungary), June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lai, F., Zhao, X., Wang, Q.: Taxonomy of information technology strategy and its impact on the performance of third-party logistics (3PL) in China. Int. J. Prod. Res. 45(10), 2195–2218 (2007)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Lai, K.-h., Cheng, T.C.E., Yeung, A.C.L.: An empirical taxonomy for logistics service providers. Maritime Econ. Logist. 6(3), 199–219 (2004). ISSN: 1479-294X

    Google Scholar 

  24. McKinsey and Company - Air-freight forwarders move forward into a digital future. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/traveltransport-and-logistics/our-insights/air-freightforwarders-move-forward-into-a-digital-future. Accessed 29 May 2019

  25. Nickerson, R.C., Varshney, U., Muntermann, J.: A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 22(3), 336–359 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Nickerson, R., et al.: Taxonomy development in information systems: developing a taxonomy of mobile applications. In: HAL, Working Papers, January 2009

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nuzzolo, A., Coppola, P., Comi, A.: Freight transport modeling: review and future challenges. Int. J. Transp. Econ./Rivista internazionale di economia dei trasporti 40(2), 151–181 (2013). ISSN: 03035247

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oláh, J., et al.: Information technology developments of logistics service providers in Hungary. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 21(3), 332–344 (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Wyman, O.: Start-Ups rollen die Logistikbranche auf. https://www.oliverwyman.de/media-center/2017/ Start-ups-rollen-Logistikbranche-auf.html. Accessed 29 May 2019

  30. Pfohl, H.-C.: Logistiksysteme. Springer, Heidelberg (2018)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. Pope, D.J., Thomchick, E.A.: U.S. Foreign freight forwarders and NVOCCs. Transp. J. 24(3), 26–36 (1985). ISSN: 00411612, 2157328X

    Google Scholar 

  32. Produktion - Wie die Logistikbranche die Digitalisierung verschläft. https://www.produktion.de/trends- innovationen/wie-dielogistikbranchedie-digitalisierung-verschlaeft-103.html. Accessed 29 May 2019

  33. Saladoo. https://www.saloodo.com/de/. Accessed 29 May 2019

  34. Walker Smith, J.: The Uber-all economy of the future. Independent Rev. 20(3), 383–390 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sorescu, A.: Data-driven business model innovation. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 34(5), 691–696 (2017). ISSN: 07376782

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Startup Region OWL - Alle 5 Tage wird ein Logistik Startup gegründet. https://www.startupregionowl.de/alle-5-tage-wirdein-logistik-startup-gegruendet/. Accessed 29 May 2019

  37. Stuart, I., et al.: Effective case research in operations management: a process perspective. J. Oper. Manage. 20(5), 419–433 (2002)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  38. Uber Freight Inc. http://www.uberfreight.com. Accessed 29 May 2019

  39. Waller, M.A., Fawcett, S.E.: Data science, predictive analytics, and big data: a revolution that will transform supply chain design and management. J. Bus. Logist. 34(2), 77–84 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  40. Weare, C., Lin, W.-Y.: Content analysis of the world wide web: opportunities and challenges. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 18(3), 272–292 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  41. Wen, C.-H., Tsai, M.-C., Lin, C.-H.: Classification and competition analysis of air cargo logistics providers: the case of Taiwan’s high-technology industry. J. Air Transp. Manage. 17(2), 106–109 (2011). ISSN: 0969-6997

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Elbert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2. Considered digital forwarders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Elbert, R., Gleser, M. (2019). Digital Forwarders. In: Bierwirth, C., Kirschstein, T., Sackmann, D. (eds) Logistics Management. Lecture Notes in Logistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29821-0_2

Download citation