Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Digital Business Strategies in Blockchain Ecosystems pp 31–45Cite as

Human-Robot Interaction in Organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

As advancement in technology is on the rise in organizational setting as observed in other areas, human-robot interaction is getting more focused in both academic and practical studies. Social robots influence business life deeply and hence human life by changing organizational settings. This study aims to explore how the interaction between humans and robots affects the workplace and in what aspects we can explain the nature of sociality and collaboration with robots. It also aims to put forward advantages and disadvantages of human-robot interaction by presenting essential reference points and discussing many aspects of human-robot interaction in organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arkin, R. C., Fujita, M., Takagi, T., & Hasegawa, R. (2003). An ethological and emotional basis for human–robot interaction. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartneck, C., & Forlizzi, J. (2004). A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the Roman 2004, Kurashiki, 591–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal, C. L. (2004). Designing sociable robots. Intelligent robotics and autonomous agents (illustrated ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal, C. (2006). Human-robot partnership, trends and controversies: Human-inspired robots. IEEE Computer Society, 21(4), 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breazeal, C., & Scassellati, B. (1999). How to build robots that make friends and influence people. In Proceedings 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human and Environment Friendly Robots with High Intelligence and Emotional Quotients (Cat. No. 99CH36289, Vol. 2, pp. 858–863). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. (2002). Humanoid robots. Communications of the ACM, 45(3), 33–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2015). The second machine age: Akıllı Teknolojiler Devrinde Çalışma, İlerleme ve Refah, (Çev.: Levent Göktem). İstanbul: Türk Hava Yolları Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, K. M. (2002). Smart agents and organizations of the future. In The Handbook of New Media, Citeseer, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W. F., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 349–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claure, H., & Jung, M. (2018). Understanding social dynamics in robot-human handovers through the lens of expectancy violations theory HRI’18, march 2018, Chicago, Illinois USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coovert, M. D., & Thompson, L. F. (2014). Toward a synergistic relationship between psychology and technology. In M. D. Coovert & L. F. Thompson (Eds.), The psychology of workplace technology (pp. 1–20). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dautenhahn, K. (2013). Human-robot interaction. In The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Kirby, J. (2015). Beyond automation: Strategies for remaining gainfully employed in an era of very smart machines. Harvard Business Review, 93(6), 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. (2018). Robotların yükselişi: Yapay zeka ve işsiz bir gelecek tehlikesi (Çev.: Cem Duran), 4. Baskı. İstanbul: Kronik Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, M. A., & Schultz, A. C. (2007). Human–robot interaction: A survey. Foundation and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction, 1(3), 203–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, P. J., Roberts, T. L., & Jones, H. (2004). Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task. Human-Computer Interaction, 19(1), 151–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro, H., & Asada, M. (2006). Humanoid and android science, trends and controversies: Human-inspired robots. IEEE Computer Society, 21(4), 74–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S., & Goodrich, M. A. (2018). The science of human-robot interaction. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, 7(1) (Article 9, May 2018), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, S., & Hinds, P. (2004). Introduction to this special issue on human-robot interaction, human–computer. Interactions, 19(1–2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mataric, M. J. (2006). Socially assistive robotics, trends and controversies: Human-inspired robots. IEEE Computer Society, 21(4), 81–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutlu, B., & Forlizzi, J. (2008). Robots in organizations: The role of workflow, social, and environmental factors in human-robot interaction (Human-Computer Interaction Institute, Paper 36).

    Google Scholar 

  • Omohundro, S. M. (2007). The nature of self-improving artificial intelligence. Talk presented at the Singularity Summit, San Francisco, CA, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, P., Laaksolahti, J., & Lonnqvist, P. (2002). Understanding social intelligence. In K. Dautenhahn, A. H. Bond, L. Canamero, & B. Edmonds (Eds.), Socially intelligent agents: Creating relationships with computers and robots (pp. 21–28). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Redden, E. S., Elliott, L. R., & Barnes, M. J. (2014). Robots: The new teammates. In M. D. Coovert & L. F. Thompson (Eds.), The psychology of workplace technology (pp. 185–208). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Jr, L. P., & You, S. (2014). Human-robot interaction in groups: Theory, method, and design for robots in groups. Group 2014, November 9–12, 2014, Sundial Island, FL, USA (pp. 310–312).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sande, G. N., Ellard, J. H., & Ross, M. (1986). Effect of arbitrarily assigned labels on self-perceptions and social perceptions: The mere position effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 684–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scassellati, B. (2000). How developmental psychology and robotics complement each other. Lansing, MI: MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab (Report Documentation Pages, 1–8).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, T. (2004). An overview of human interactive robots for psychological enrichment. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(11), 1749–1758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, T., & Irie, R. (1997, June). Artificial emotional creature for human-robot interaction-a new direction for intelligent systems. In Proceedings of IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (p. 47). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld, A., Fong, T., Kaber, D., Lewis, M., Scholtz, J., Schultz, A., et al. (2006, March). Common metrics for human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction (pp. 33–40). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, J. (1995). Vividness and source of evaluation as determinants of social responses toward mediated representations of agency. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, R. M., & Merkle, M. (2018). Can humanoid service robots perform better than service employees? A comparison of innovative behavior cues. In Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, J. Y., Christensen, H. I., & Grinter, R. E. (2009, March 13). Robots in the wild: Understanding long-term use. In HRI’09 Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, La Jolla, California, USA (pp. 45–52).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapus, A., & Mataric, M. J. (2007, March). Emulating empathy in socially assistive robotics. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics (pp. 93–96).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thielscher, M. (2006). Cognitive robotics, trends and controversies: Human-inspired robots. IEEE Computer Society, 21(4), 77–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oost, E., & Reed, D. (2011). Towards a sociological understanding of robots as companions. In M. H. Lamers & F. J. Verbeek (Eds.), Human-robot personal relationships (Vol. LNICTS 59, pp. 11–18). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, J. D. (1999, October). An emotion-based approach to robotics. In Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Kyongju, Korea (pp. 235–240).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business, Faculty of Political Sciences, Istanbul University, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ayşegül Özbebek Tunç

Authors
  1. Ayşegül Özbebek Tunç
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayşegül Özbebek Tunç .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, Ibn Haldun University, Basaksehir, Istanbul, Turkey

    Umit Hacioglu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tunç, A.Ö. (2020). Human-Robot Interaction in Organizations. In: Hacioglu, U. (eds) Digital Business Strategies in Blockchain Ecosystems. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29739-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation