Abstract
The partitioning of precipitation by vegetation canopies into throughfall and evaporation can have a large effect on water availability for both ecosystems and human consumption. Canopies are often the first point of contact between precipitation and the land surface, yet the complexity and inaccessibility of this interface make measurements extremely difficult, and as a result our attempts to understand and model the relevant processes are only weakly constrained. Here, we describe common approaches to modeling canopy interception processes, particularly in global models. These models use a wide variety of parameterization and parameters internally, suggesting that we do not have a good understanding of how to model canopy interception on a global scale. To begin to quantify how big a problem this may be, we present a few ideal model experiments exploring a range of modeling approaches and assumptions to document what effect these choices have on the projection of changes in inputs to the eco-hydrologic system. Perhaps unsurprisingly, these effects vary with vegetation type and density, as well as precipitation type, intensity, and changes in precipitation. In many cases, these effects are likely dwarfed by the uncertainties in predicted changes in regional climate, but not accounting for our lack of certainty in canopy processes can lead to an overconfident, and in some cases likely incorrect, projection of future changes in water availability. This should serve as a call to action for those studying canopy interception processes to better document and consider how theories can be put into a numerical framework.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abramowitz G, Herger N, Gutmann E, Hammerling D, Knutti R, Leduc M, Lorenz R, Pincus R, Schmidt GA (2019) ESD reviews: model dependence in multi-model climate ensembles: weighting, sub-selection and out-of-sample testing. Earth Syst Dyn 10(1):91–105. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-91-2019
Andreadis KM, Storck P, Lettenmaier DP (2009) Modeling snow accumulation and ablation processes in forested environments. Water Resour Res 45(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr007042
Balsamo G, Beljaars A, Scipal K, Viterbo P, van den Hurk B, Hirschi M, Betts AK (2009) A revised hydrology for the ECMWF model: verification from field site to terrestrial water storage and impact in the integrated forecast system. J Hydrometeorol 10(3):623–643. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JHM1068.1
Best MJ et al (2011) The joint UK land environment simulator (JULES), model description—part 1: energy and water fluxes. Geosci Model Dev 4(3):677–699. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011
Bonan GB, Lawrence PJ, Oleson KW, Levis S, Jung M, Reichstein M, Lawrence DM, Swenson SC (2011) Improving canopy processes in the community land model version 4 (CLM4) using global flux fields empirically inferred from FLUXNET data. J Geophys Res Atmos 116(G2):GB1008. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jg001593
Brekke LD, Maurer EP, Anderson JD, Dettinger MD, Townsley ES, Harrison A, Pruitt T (2009) Assessing reservoir operations risk under climate change. Water Resour Res 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr006941
Bulcock HH, Jewitt GPW (2012) Modelling canopy and litter interception in commercial forest plantations in South Africa using the variable storage gash model and idealised drying curves. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16(12):4693–4705. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4693-2012
Clark MP et al (2015a) A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 1. Modeling concept. Water Resour Res 51(4):2498–2514. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017198
Clark MP et al (2015b) A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies. Water Resour Res 51(4):2515–2542. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017200
Clark MP, Wilby RL, Gutmann ED, Vano JA, Gangopadhyay S, Wood AW, Fowler HJ, Prudhomme C, Arnold JR, Brekke LD (2016) Characterizing uncertainty of the hydrologic impacts of climate change. Curr Clim Chang Rep 2(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0034-x
Cosgrove B (2017) Continental-scale operational hydrologic modeling: version 1.0 of the national water model. AMS, Seattle
Davies-Barnard T, Valdes PJ, Jones CD, Singarayer JS (2014) Sensitivity of a coupled climate model to canopy interception capacity. Clim Dyn 42(7–8):1715–1732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2100-1
Dee DP et al (2011) The ERA-interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137(656):553–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828
Dickinson RE (1984) Modeling evapotranspiration for three-dimensional global climate models. Geophysical Monograph Series, American Geophysical Union (AGU), Washington, D. C.
Fisher RA et al (2017) Vegetation demographics in Earth system models: a review of progress and priorities. Glob Change Biol 24(1):35–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13910
Friesen J, Lundquist J, Van Stan JTI (2015) Evolution of forest precipitation water storage measurement methods. Hydrol Process 29(11):2504–2520. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10376
Gash JHC (1979) An analytical model of rainfall interception by forests. Q J R Meteorol Soc 105(443):43–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710544304
Gutman G, Ignatov A (1998) The derivation of the green vegetation fraction from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models. Int J Remote Sens 19(8):1533–1543. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698215333
Gutmann ED, Small EE (2005) The effect of soil hydraulic properties vs. soil texture in land surface models. Geophys Res Lett 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl021843
Gutmann ED, Small EE (2010) A method for the determination of the hydraulic properties of soil from MODIS surface temperature for use in land-surface models. Water Resour Res 46(6). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009wr008203
Hartley AJ, MacBean N, Georgievski G, Bontemps S (2017) Uncertainty in plant functional type distributions and its impact on land surface models. Remote Sens Environ 203:71–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.037
Hormann G, Branding A, Clemen T, Herbst M, Hinrichs A, Thamm F (1996) Calculation and simulation of wind controlled canopy interception of a beech forest in northern Germany. Agric For Meteorol 79(3):131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(95)02275-9
Huete A, Didan K, Miura T, Rodriguez EP, Gao X, Ferreira LG (2002) Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens Environ 83(1–2):195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2
Hurrell JW et al (2013) The community earth system model: a framework for collaborative research. Bull Am Meteor Soc 94(9):1339–1360. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00121.1
Krinner G, Viovy N, de Noblet-Ducoudré N, Ogée J, Polcher J, Friedlingstein P, Ciais P, Sitch S, Prentice IC (2005) A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 19(1):1–44. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002199
Lawrence DM, Thornton PE, Oleson KW, Bonan GB (2007) The partitioning of evapotranspiration into transpiration, soil evaporation, and canopy evaporation in a GCM: impacts on land-atmosphere interaction. J Hydrometeorol 8(4):862–880. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM596.1
Lawrence D, Fisher R, Koven C, Oleson K, Swenson S, Vertenstein M (2019) Technical description of version 5.0 of the community land model (CLM). National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
Leavesley GH, Lichty RW, Troutman BM, Saindon LG (1983) Precipitation-runoff modeling system; user’s manual
Letcher TW, Minder JR (2015) Characterization of the simulated regional snow albedo feedback using a regional climate model over complex terrain. J Clim 28(19):7576–7595. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0166.1
Liang X, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Burges SJ (1994) A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J Geophys Res 99(D7):14415–14428. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD00483
Liu C et al (2016) Continental-scale convection-permitting modeling of the current and future climate of North America. Clim Dyn, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3327-9
Lundberg A, Halldin S (2001) Snow interception evaporation. Review of measurement techniques, processes, and models. Theor Appl Climatol 70(1–4):117–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007040170010
Markstrom SL et al (2012) Integrated watershed-scale response to climate change for selected basins across the United States. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA
Markstrom SL, Regan RS, Hay LE, Viger RJ, Webb RM, Payn RA, LaFontaine JH (2015) PRMS-IV, the precipitation-runoff modeling system, version 4, USGS
Maurer EP, Wood AW, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP, Nijssen B (2002) A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. J Clim 15(22):3237–3251. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%3c3237:althbd%3e2.0.co;2
Mitchell KE (2004) The multi-institution North American land data assimilation system (NLDAS): utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J Geophys Res 109(D7):7449. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003823
Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and the environment, vol 19, pp 205–234
Moreno-Martínez Á et al (2018) A methodology to derive global maps of leaf traits using remote sensing and climate data. Remote Sens Environ 218:69–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.09.006
Niu G-Y, Yang Z-L (2004) Effects of vegetation canopy processes on snow surface energy and mass balances. J Geophys Res Atmos 109(D23):661. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004884
Niu G-Y et al (2011) The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements. J Geophys Res 116(D12):D12109. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015139
Noilhan J, Mahfouf JF (1996) The ISBA land surface parameterisation scheme. Glob Planet Chang 13(1–4):145–159
Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc R Soc London. Ser A Math Phys Sci 193(1032):120–145
Porada P, Van Stan JTI, Kleidon A (2018) Significant contribution of non-vascular vegetation to global rainfall interception. Nat Geosci 11(8):563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0176-7
Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ (1972) On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Month Weather Rev. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100%3c0081:otaosh%3e2.3.co;2
Rodríguez-Fernández NJ et al (2018) An evaluation of SMOS L-band vegetation optical depth (L-VOD) data sets: high sensitivity of L-VOD to above-ground biomass in Africa. Biogeosciences 15(14):4627–4645. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-4627-2018
Rutter AJ, Kershaw KA, Robins PC, Morton AJ (1971) A predictive model of rainfall interception in forests, 1. Derivation of the model from observations in a plantation of Corsican pine. Agric Meteorol 9:367–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(71)90034-3
Sellers PJ, Mintz Y, Sud YC, Dalcher A (1986) A simple biosphere model (SiB) for use within general circulation models. J Atmos Sci 43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1007436
Shukla S, Wood AW (2008) Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought. Geophys Res Lett 35(2):1100. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032487
Skamarock WC, Klemp JB (2008) A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications. J Comput Phys 227(7):3465–3485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.037
Storck P, Lettenmaier DP, Bolton SM (2002) Measurement of snow interception and canopy effects on snow accumulation and melt in a mountainous maritime climate, Oregon, United States. Water Resour Res 38(11):16–5–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002wr001281
Sturm M, Goldstein MA, Parr C (2017) Water and life from snow: a trillion dollar science question. Water Resour Res 36(34):L24404–3544. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020840
Swank WT, Douglass JE (1974) Streamflow greatly reduced by converting deciduous hardwood stands to pine. Science 185(4154):857–859. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4154.857
Tague CL, Band LE (2009) RHESSys: regional hydro-ecologic simulation system—an object-oriented approach to spatially distributed modeling of carbon, water, and nutrient cycling. Earth Interact 8(19):1–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1087-3562(2004)8<1:RRHSSO>2.0.CO;2
Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38(1):55–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/210739
Trabucco A, Zomer RJ, Bossio DA, van Straaten O, Verchot LV (2008) Climate change mitigation through afforestation/reforestation: a global analysis of hydrologic impacts with four case studies. Agr Ecosyst Environ 126(1–2):81–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.015
Tucker CJ (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ 8(2):127–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0
van der Ent RJ, Wang-Erlandsson L, Keys PW, Savenije HHG (2014) Contrasting roles of interception and transpiration in the hydrological cycle—part 2: moisture recycling. Earth Syst Dyn 5(2):471–489. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-471-2014
Van Stan JT II, Gutmann ED, Lewis ES, Gay TE (2016) Modeling Rainfall interception loss for an epiphyte-laden Quercus virginiana Forest using reformulated static- and variable-storage gash analytical models. J Hydrometeorol 17(7):1985–1997. https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-16-0046.1
Wang YP, Kowalczyk E, Leuning R, Abramowitz G, Raupach MR, Pak B, van Gorsel E, Luhar A (2011) Diagnosing errors in a land surface model (CABLE) in the time and frequency domains. J Geophys Res 116(G1):L22702–L22718. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JG001385
Zhang SY, Li XY, Li L, Huang YM, Zhao GQ, Chen HY (2015) The measurement and modelling of stemflow in an alpine Myricaria squamosa community. Hydrol Process 29(6):889–899. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10201
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gutmann, E.D. (2020). Global Modeling of Precipitation Partitioning by Vegetation and Their Applications
.
In: Van Stan, II, J., Gutmann, E., Friesen, J. (eds) Precipitation Partitioning by Vegetation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29702-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29702-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29701-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29702-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)