Abrahamson, D., & Sánchez-García, R. (2016). Learning is moving in new ways: The ecological dynamics of mathematics education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 203–239.
Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Durham: Duke University Press.
Ball, W. (1888). A short account of the history of mathematics. London: Macmillan.
Brown, R., Newton, L., & Tam, G. (2015). The Toronto District School Board’s student group overviews: Aboriginal heritage, Afghan, Portuguese-speaking, Somali-speaking, and Spanish- speaking students. Retrieved from http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/research/docs/reports/TDSB.StudentGroupOverviews.pdf.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). What is STEM education? Science, 329(5995), 996.
Committee of Localities with a Concentrated Foreigner Population [Gaikokujin Shujyu Toshi Kaigi]. (2012). Report on the 2012 Tokyo conference for the committee of localities with a concentrated foreigner population [Gaikokujin Shujyu Toshi Kaigi Tokyo 2012 Houkokusho.] Retrieved from http://www.shujutoshi.jp/.
Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Council of Canadian Academies. (2015). Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity. Ottawa: Council of Canadian Academies.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2013). New materialist ontologies in mathematics education: The body in/of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 453–470.
Dixson, A. D., & Rousseau, C. K. (2006). And we are still not saved: Critical race theory in education ten years later. In A. D. Dixson & C. K. Rousseau (Eds.), Critical race theory in education: All God’s children got a song (pp. 31–54). New York, NY: Routledge.
Education Quality and Accountability Office. (2013). EQAO’s provincial elementary school report: Results of the 2012–2013 assessments of reading, writing and mathematics, primary division. Retrieved from http://www.eqao.com/Pages/launch.aspx
Esmonde, I., & Booker, A. N. (2016). Power and privilege in the learning sciences: Critical and sociocultural theories of learning. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Esmonde, I., Brodie, K., Dookie, L., & Takeuchi, M. (2009). Social identities and opportunities to learn: Student perspectives on group work in an urban mathematics classroom. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 2(2), 18–45. Retrieved from http://ed-osprey.gsu.edu/ojs/index.php/JUME/article/view/46
Fernández, L. (2002). Telling stories about school: Using critical race and Latino critical theories to document Latina/Latino education and resistance. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 45–65.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (L. M. Colin Gordon, J. Mepham, K. Soper, Trans. G. Colin, Ed.). Vintage Books: New York.
García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Greer, B., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Roth, W. M. (2013). Celebrating diversity, realizing alternatives). In W. M. Roth, L. Verschaffel, & S. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Alternative forms of knowing (in) mathematics: Celebration of diversity of mathematical practices (pp. 1–8). Rotterdam: Sense.
Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: Toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598.
Hoeg, D. G., & Bencze, J. L. (2017). Values underpinning STEM education in the USA: An analysis of the next generation science standards. Science Education, 101(2), 278–301.
Holland, D., Skinner, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hwang, S., & Roth, W. M. (2011). Scientific and mathematical bodies: The interface of culture and mind. Rotterdam: Sense.
Il’enkov, E. (1977). Dialecticallogic: Essaysin its history and theory (H. C. Creighton, Trans.). Moscow: Progress.
Japanese Cabinet. (2016). Declaration for establishing a global IT nation. [Sekai Saisentan IT Kokka Sozo Sengen]. Retrieved from http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/it2/decision.html.
Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. (1995). Towards a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
Langer, P. C. (2016). The research vignette: Reflexive writing as interpretative representation of qualitative inquiry—A methodological proposition. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(9), 735–744.
Lee, V. R. (2015). Learning technologies and the body: Integration and implementation in formal and informal learning environments. New York, NY: Routledge.
Leyva, L. (2016). An intersectional analysis of Latin@ college women’s counter-stories in mathematics. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(2), 81–121. Retrieved from http://ed-osprey.gsu.edu/ojs/index.php/JUME/article/view/295
Ma, J. Y. (2017). Multi-party, whole-body interactions in mathematical activity. Cognition and Instruction, 35(2), 141–164.
Ministry of Justice [Homusho]. (2013). Numbers of the registered foreign nationals: Nationalities, areas and purpose for stay. [Kokuseki chiiki betsu zairyu shikaku mokuteki betsu zairyu gaikokujin]. Retrieved from http://www.moj.go.jp/housei/toukei/toukei_ichiran_touroku.html.
Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. New York, NY: Kitchen Table.
Nasir, N. S., & Bang, M. (2012). Conceptualizing cultural and racialized process in learning. Human Development, 55(5–6), 247–249.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education.
Nemirovsky, R., Tierney, C., & Wright, T. (1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 119–172.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student a chance to succeed. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-II.pdf.
Philip, T. M., Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Turpen, C. (2018). Why ideology matters for learning: A case of ideological convergence in an engineering ethics classroom discussion on drone warfare. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(2), 183–223.
Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Saxe, G. B., & Esmonde, I. (2005). Studying cognition in flux: A historical treatment of Fu in the shifting structure of Oksapmin mathematics. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(3), 171–225.
Science Technology and Innovation Council. (2009). State of the nation 2008: Canada’s science, technology and innovation system. Ottawa: Science Technology and Innovation Council.
Science Technology and Innovation Council. (2015). State of the nation 2014: Canada’s science, technology and innovation system. Ottawa: Science Technology and Innovation Council.
Sen, A. (1997). Human capital and human capability. World Development, 25(12), 1959–1961.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Sengupta, P., & Shanahan, M.-C. (2017). Boundary play and pivots in public computation: New directions in STEM education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(3), 1124–1134. Retrieved from https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c330317.html
Shanahan, M.-C., Burke, L. E., & Francis, K. (2016). Using a boundary object perspective to reconsider the meaning of STEM in a Canadian context. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 16(2), 129–139.
Shinjyuku-ku. (2012). The study on the schooling situation of children with foreign origins [Gaikoku ni roots wo motsu kodomo no jittai chosa]. Retrieved from http://www.city.shinjuku.lg.jp/content/000109321.pdf.
Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44.
Strong, L., Adams, J. D., Bellino, M. E., Pieroni, P., Stoops, J., & Das, A. (2016). Against neoliberal enclosure: Using a critical transdisciplinary approach in science teaching and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(3), 225–236.
Sumara, D., & Davis, B. (1999). Interrupting heteronormativity: Toward a queer curriculum theory. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(2), 191–208.
Takeuchi, M. (2015). The situated multiliteracies approach to classroom participation: English language learners’ participation in classroom mathematics practices. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 14(3), 159–178.
Takeuchi, M. A. (2016). Friendships and group work in linguistically diverse mathematics classrooms: Opportunities to learn for English language learners. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(3), 411–437.
Takeuchi, M. A. (2018). Power and identity in immigrant parents’ involvement in early years mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 39–53.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2005). Mathematics as a constructive activity: Learners generating examples. New York, NY: Routledge.
Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.