Critical Success Factors for Dynamic Enterprise Risk Management in Responsive Organisations: A Factor Analysis Approach

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11701)


Globalisation and technology advancements have disrupted the organisational landscape and with the proliferation of new technology; risk management is fundamental to transforming the business especially considering the dynamic nature of the digital society organisations now exist in. However, the challenge faced by the enterprise risk management (ERM) function operating in such a dynamic and transformative environment, is the capability to continuously innovate, evolve and transform its risk management processes to meet the needs of the organisation. Questionnaire survey research examined the relative importance of 18 critical success factors for dynamic ERM. Factor analysis revealed that the appropriate grouping of the 18 critical success factors (CSFs) are ERM charter, ERM processes, and ERM business alignment. These findings should empower organisations to identify risk management processes influencing agility in the risk management practise applied.


  1. 1.
    Sarah, B.Y., et al.: Agility ability. PM Netw. 26(10), 54–61 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., Sambamurthy, V.: Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2006(15), 120–131 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burba, D.: When agile meets auditor. PM Netw. 29(1), 60–67 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teece, D., Peteraf, M., Leih, S.: Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. Calif. Manag. Rev. 58(4), 13–35 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blanco, C., Hinrichs, J., Mark, R.: Creating risk culture: a framework risk culture (2014). Accessed March 2019
  6. 6.
    Nyfjord, J., Kajko-Mattsson, M.: Outlining a model integrating risk management and agile software development. In: 34th Euromicro Conference Software Engineering and Advanced Applications. IEEE, Parma, Italy (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ganju, K.K., Pavlou, P.A., Banker, R.D.: Does information and communication technology lead to the wellbeing of nations? A country-level empirical investigation. MIS Q. 40(2), 417–430 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rocha, L., et al.: Cloud management tools for sustainable SMEs. Procedia CIRP 40, 220–224 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ismail, S., Malone, M.S., Van Geest, Y.: Exponential Organisations: Why New Organisations are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper than Yours (and What to do About it). Diversion Publishing Corporation, Diversion Books, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knight, F.H.: Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship (2012). Accessed March 2019Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO 31000 - Risk management. ISO 31000: 2018 Risk management – Guidelines (2018). Accessed March 2019
  12. 12.
    Gatzert, N., Martin, M.: Determinants and value of enterprise risk management: empirical evidence from the literature 2013. Department for Insurance Economics and Risk Management Friedrich-Alexander-University (FAU) of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hopkin, P.: Fundamentals of Risk Management Understanding, Evaluating and Implementing Effective Risk Management. Kogan Page, London (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Strengthening Enterprise Risk Management for Strategic Advantage (2017). Accessed March 2019
  15. 15.
    Walczak, W., Kuchta, D.: Risks characteristic of agile project management methodologies and responses to them. Oper. Res. Decis. 23(4), 75–95 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nyfjord, J., Kajko-Mattsson, M.: Commonalities in risk management and agile process models. In: 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering Advances. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mabey, C., Salaman, G., Storey, J.: Organizational structuring and restructuring. In: Understanding Business Organisations. Routledge, London (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ahmed, I., Manab, N.A.: Influence of enterprise risk management success factors on firm financial and non-financial performance: a proposed model. Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues 6(3), 1–7 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soltanizadeh, S., et al.: Business strategy, enterprise risk management and organizational performance. Manag. Res. Rev. 39(9), 1016–1033 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nair, A., et al.: Enterprise risk management as a dynamic capability: a test of its effectiveness during a crisis. Manag. Decis. Econ. 35(8), 555–566 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aziz, N.A.A., Manab, N.A., Othman, S.N.: Critical success factors of sustainability risk management (SRM) practices in Malaysian environmentally sensitive industries. Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016(219), 4–11 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McMillan, E.: Considering organisation structure and design from a complexity paradigm perspective. In: Frizzelle, G., Richards, H. (eds.) Tackling Industrial Complexity: the Ideas that Make a Difference, pp. 123–136. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ambrose, C., Morello, D.: Designing the agile organization: design principles and practices. In: Strategic Analysis Report, pp. 1–25. Gartner Research (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yusuf, Y., Sarhadi, M., Gunasekaran, A.: Agile manufacturing: the drivers, concepts and attributes. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 62(1–2), 33–43 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boahin, P.: The changing nature of work and employability skills development in Higher Education Institutions in Ghana. Eur. J. Educ. Dev. Psychol. 6(3), 21–32 (2018)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Coulson-Thomas, C.: IT and new forms of organisation for knowledge workers: opportunity and implementation. Empl. Relat. 13(4), 22–32 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dove, R.: Response Ability: The Language, Structure and Culture of the Agile Enterprise. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Roggi, O., Andersen, T.J.: Strategic risk management and corporate value creation. In: Andersen, T.J. (ed) The Routledge Companion to Strategic Risk Management, pp. 421–437. Routledge (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Using risk to balance agile and plan-driven methods. IEEE Comput. Soc. 36(6), 57–66 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Davis, F.W., Manrodt, K.B.: Service logistics: an introduction. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 21(7), 4–13 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaur, A., Sharma, P.C.: Social sustainability in supply chain decisions: Indian manufacturers. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 20(4), 1707–1721 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McIntosh, R.I., et al.: Late customisation: issues of mass customisation in the food industry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 48(6), 1557–1574 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Barclay, I., Poolton, J., Dann, Z.: Improving competitive responsiveness via the virtual environment, pp. 52–62. IEEE (1996)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dove, R.: Knowledge management, response ability, and the agile enterprise. J. Knowl. Manag. 3(1), 18–35 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Holbeche, L.: The Agile Organisation: How to Build an Innovative, Sustainable and Resilient Business. Kogan Page, London (2018)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Critical Success Factor: The Business Dictionary (2019)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cormican, K.: Integrated enterprise risk management: from process to best practice. Mod. Econ. 5, 401–413 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Shad, M.K., Lai, F.: A conceptual framework for enterprise risk management performance measure through economic value added. Glob. Bus. Manag. Res.: Int. J. 7(2), 1–11 (2015)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhao, X., Hwang, B., Low, S.P.: Critical success factors for enterprise risk management in Chinese construction companies. Constr. Manag. Econ. 31(12), 1199–1214 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yaraghi, N., Langhe, R.G.: Critical success factors for risk management systems. J. Risk Res. 14(5), 551–581 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Choi, Y., et al.: Optimizing enterprise risk management: a literature review and critical analysis of the work of Wu and Olson. Ann. Oper. Res. 237(1–2), 281–300 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang, H., Barney, J., Reuer, J.: Stimulating firm-specific investment through risk management. Long Range Plann. 36, 49–59 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Peteraf, M.A., Maritan, C.: Dynamic capabilities and organisational processes. In: Helfat, C. et al. (eds.) Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organization, pp. 30–45. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK (2007)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kelley, K., et al.: Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 15(3), 261–266 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Oates, B.J.: Researching Information Systems and Computing. SAGE Publications, London (2008)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    De Villiers, M.R.: Models for interpretive information systems research, part 2: design research, development research, design-science research, and design-based research - a meta-study and examples. In: Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems, pp. 238–255 (2012)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Etikan, I.: Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 5(5), 1–4 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Morling, B.: Research Methods in Psychology: Evaluating a World of Information. Norton, Canada (2015)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Williams, B., Onsman, A., Brown, T.: Exploratory factor analysis: a five-step guide for novices journal of emergency. Primary Health Care 8(3), 1–13 (2010)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Akhtar-Danesh, N.: A comparison between major factor extraction and factor rotation techniques in Q-methodology. Open J. Appl. Sci. 7, 147–156 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations