Abstract
This chapter explores the posited commercialisation of intimate relationships and the threat that this is perceived to pose to traditional forms of commitment (Illouz, Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007; Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2012). It draws on a qualitative study of heterosexual male Tinder users, with analysis undermining the distinction between ‘hook-ups’ and long-term commitment, as participants began all encounters casually before they potentially developed further. Encounters initiated on the app were dominated by heteronormative scripts, reflecting wider structural gender inequalities rather than fundamentally challenging them. On the basis of these findings, there is limited evidence to suggest that the use of dating apps such as Tinder reflects either the emancipatory potential of the Internet or the commercialisation of intimate life.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albright, J. M. (2007) How do I Love Thee and Thee and Thee: Self-presentation, Deception, and Multiple Relationships Online. In M. Whitty, A. Baker and J. Inman, (eds.) Online Matchmaking. London: Palgrave Macmillan: 81–93.
Alvesson, M. and Sandberg, J. (2013) Constructing Research Questions. London: Sage.
Barlow, A., Duncan, S., James, G. and Park, A. (2005) Cohabitation, Marriage and the Law: Social Change and Legal Reform in the 21st Century. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Boyd, D. (2007) Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life. In D. Buckingham (ed.) Youth Identity and Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 119–142.
Carter, J. (2012) What is commitment? Women’s accounts of intimate attachment. Families, Relationships and Societies 1 (2): 137–153.
Carter, J. (2013) The curious absence of love stories in women’s talk. Sociological Review 61 (4): 728–744.
Castells, M. (2007) Communication, Power and Counter-Power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication 1: 238–266.
Chung, D. (2005) Violence, Control, Romance and Gender Equality: Young Women and Heterosexual Relationships. Women’s Studies International Forum 28 (6), 445–55.
Doring, N. (2000) Feminist Views of Cybersex: Victimization, Liberation, and Empowerment. CyberPsychology and Behavior 3: 863–884.
Ellison, N., Heino, R. and Gibbs, J. (2006) Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (2): 415–441.
Evans, M. (2003) Love: An Unromantic Discussion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Farvid, P. and Braun, V. (2006) ‘Most of Us Guys Are Raring to Go Anytime, Anyplace, Anywhere’: Male and Female Sexuality in Cleo and Cosmo. Sex Roles 55: 295–310.
Featherstone, M. (1991) Consumer Culture and Postmodernism. London: Sage.
Gabb, J. and Fink, J. (2015) Couple relationships in the 21st century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Goffman, E. (1957) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
Hobbs, M., Owen, S. and Gerber, L. (2016) Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy. Journal of Sociology 53 (2): 271–284.
Hochschild, A. (1994) The Commercial Spirit of Intimate Life and the Abduction of Feminism: Signs from Women’s Advice Books. Theory, Culture and Society 11: 1–24.
Hogan, B. (2010) The presentation of self in the age of social media: Distinguishing performances and exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30 (6): 377–386.
Holmes, M. (2015) Men’s emotions: Heteromasculinity, emotional reflexivity, and intimate relationships. Men and Masculinities, 18 (2): 176–192.
Illouz, E. (2007) Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Illouz, E. (2012) Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jagger, E. (2001) Marketing Molly and Melville: Dating in a Postmodern Consumer Society. Sociology 35: 39–57.
Jamieson, L. (2013) Personal Relationships, intimacy and the self in a mediated and global digital age. In K. Orton-Johnson, and N. Prior (eds.) Digital Sociology: Critical Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jamieson, L. (1998) Intimacy: Personal Relationships in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Lasch, C. (1979) The Culture of Narcissism. London: Abacus.
Lewis, J. (2001) The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Miller, D. (2011) Tales from Facebook. Cambridge: Polity Press.
ONS (2018) Marriages in England and Wales: 2015, available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/marriagecohabitationandcivilpartnerships/bulletins/marriagesinenglandandwalesprovisional/2015.
Poster, M. (1995) The Second Media Age. London: Polity.
Rosenfeld, M. J. (2018) Are Tinder and Dating Apps Changing Dating and Mating in the U.S.? In J. Van Hook, S. M. McHale and V. King (eds.) Families and Technology. New York: Springer: 103–117.
Sales, N. J. (2015) Tinder and the dawn of the ‘Dating Apocalypse.’ Vanity Fair, September. Available at: http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/08/tinder-hook-up-culture-end-of-dating.
Smart, C. (2007) Personal Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Smart, C. and Stevens, P. (2000) Cohabitation Breakdown. London: Family Policy.
Sutton, L., Cebulla, A. and Middleton, S. (2003) Marriage in the 21st Century. Centre for Research in Social Policy CRSP. Working Paper 482.
Timmermans E. and Courtois, C. (2018) From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: Exploring the experiences of Tinder users. The Information Society 34 (2): 59–70.
Tinder (2018) ‘Tinder Presents the Year in Swipe’, available at https://blog.gotinder.com/tinder-presents-the-year-in-swipe-r/ [].
Valentine, G. (2006) Globalizing Intimacy: The Role of Information and Communication Technologies. Women’s Studies Quarterly 34 (1/2): 365–393.
van Hooff, J. (2017) An everyday affair: Deciphering the sociological significance of women’s attitudes towards infidelity. Sociological Review 65 (4): 850–864.
van Hooff, J (2013) Modern couples? Continuity and change in heterosexual relationships. Basingstoke: Ashgate.
Wade, L. (2017) American Hookup: The New Culture of Sex on Campus. New York: WW Norton & Co.
Walther, J. B. (1996) Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research 23 (1): 3–44.
Ward, J. (2017) What are you doing on Tinder? Impression management on a matchmaking mobile app. Information, Communication & Society 20(11): 1644–1659.
Weeks, J. (1995) Invented Moralities: Sexual Values in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Hooff, J. (2020). Swipe Right? Tinder, Commitment and the Commercialisation of Intimate Life. In: Carter, J., Arocha, L. (eds) Romantic Relationships in a Time of ‘Cold Intimacies’. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29256-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29256-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29255-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29256-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)