Skip to main content

Innovation Climate in Plural Form Franchise Networks: The Mediator Role of Mutual Learning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design and Management of Interfirm Networks

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 506 Accesses

Abstract

This paper deals with the role of organizational forms in the innovation activities of retail and service chains and more specifically within plural form networks where franchised and company-owned units (e.g., stores, hotels, restaurants) coexist. The main purpose of this study is to predict the influence of the organizational form of franchise networks by assessing the effect of plural form organization on the innovation climate of these networks. This paper examines how the degree of organizational mix, measured by the PCO (proportion of company-owned outlets) chosen by network operators, can influence the innovation climate considered as important criterion for innovative organization evaluation. It is hypothesized that the effects of plural form on the innovation climate are mediated by the mutual learning between franchised and company-owned outlets. Results from French networks support the mediation hypothesis and provide evidence that equilibrium in the proportion of franchised and company units is related to a high level of mutual learning, thereby positively influencing the network climate for innovation. Overall, this study contributes to the franchise literature by exploring the role of plural form as governance mechanism for creating a positive innovation climate in the franchise network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarikka-Stenroos L, Rittala P (2017) Network management in the era of ecosystems: systematic review and management framework. Ind Mark Manag 67:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbey A, Dickson JW (1983) R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Acad Manag J 26:362–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer M, Frese M (2003) Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. J Organ Behav 24(1):45–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai CE, Tao Z (2000) Contract mixing in franchising as a mechanism for public good provision. J Econ Manag Strateg 9(1):85–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthélemy J (2011) Agency and institutional influences on franchising decisions. J Bus Ventur 26(1):93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradach JL (1997) Using plural form in the Management of Restaurant Chains. Adm Sci Q 42(2):276–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradach JL (1998) Franchise organization. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradach JL, Eccles RG (1989) Price, authority, and trust: from ideal types to plural forms. Annu Rev Sociol 15:97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickley JA, Dark FH (1987) The choice of organizational form: the case of franchising. J Financ Econ 18:401–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bürkle T, Posselt T (2008) Franchising as a plural system: a risk based explanation. J Retail 84(1):39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney M, Gedajlovic E (1991) Vertical integration in franchise systems: agency theory and resource explanations. Strateg Manag J 12:607–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JJ, Dimou I (2005) Expansion strategy of international hotel firms. J Bus Res 58(12):1730–1740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Mark Res 16(1):64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliquet G, Nguyen MN (2004) Innovation management within the plural form network, in economics and Management of Franchising Networks. In: Windsperger J, Cliquet G, Hendrikse G, Tuunanen M (eds) Economics and Management of Franchising Networks. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 109–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cliquet G, Pénard T (2012) Plural form franchise networks: a test of Bradach’s model. J Retail Consum Serv 19:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox J, Mason C (2007) Standardization versus adaptation: geographical pressure to deviate from franchise formats. Serv Ind J 27(8):1063–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyrenne P (2014) Dual distribution and the Penrose effect. Int J Econ Bus 21(1):55–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dant RP, Kaufmann PJ (2003) Structural and strategic dynamics in franchising. J Retail 79:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dant RP, Nasr N (1998) Control techniques and upward flow of information in franchising in distant markets: conceptualization and preliminary evidence. J Bus Ventur 13(1):3–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dant RP, Kaufmann PJ, Paswan AK (1992) Ownership redirection in Franchised Channel. J Public Policy Mark 11(1):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Benedetto CA (1999) Identifying the key success factors in new product launch. J Prod Innov Manag 16(6):530–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson MW, Smith DB, Grojean MW, Ehrhart M (2001) An organizational climate regarding ethics; the outcome of leader values and the practices that reflect them. Leadersh Q 12:197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimou I, Chen J, Archer S (2003) The choice between management contracts and franchise agreements in the corporate development of international hotel firms. J Mark Channels 10(3/4):33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrmann T, Spranger G (2004) Successful franchising using the plural form. In: Cliquet G, Hendrikse G, Tuunanen M, Windsperger J (eds) Economics and management of franchising networks. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall G (1983) Climate, structure and innovativeness of organizations: a theoretical framework and experiment. Report for the Swedish Council for Management and Work Life Issues, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall G (1986) Working climate and creativity: a study of an innovative newspaper office. J Creat Behav 20(3):215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elango B, Fried VH (1977) Franchising research: a literature review and synthesis. J Small Bus Manag 35(3):68–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidler LA, Johnson JD (1984) Communication and innovation implementation. Acad Manag Serv 9(4):707–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forward J, Fulop C (1997) Insights into franchising: a review of empirical and theoretical perspectives. Serv Ind J 17:603–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallini N, Lutz N (1992) Dual distribution and royalty fees in franchising. J Law Econ Org 8(3):471–501

    Google Scholar 

  • González-Romá V, Peiró JM, Tordera N (2002) An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength. J Appl Psychol 87(3):465–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman LA (1960) On the exact variance of products. J Am Stat Assoc 55:708–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gubman E, Russell S (2006) “Think big, start small, scale fast”: growing customer innovation at McDonald’s. Hum Resour Plan 29(3):21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2014) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen SG, Lauer KJ, Ekvall G, Britz A (2000) Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creat Res J 13(2):171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jambulingam T, Nevin JR (1999) Influence of franchisee selection criteria on outcomes desired by the franchisor. J Bus Ventur 14:363–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmeni K, de La Villarmois O, Mansouri F (2017) Contrôle et innovation: étude de l’effet médiateur de la diffusion des connaissances dans les réseaux de franchise. Comptab Contrôl Audi 23(3):63–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann PJ, Eroglu S (1998) Standardization and adaptation in business format franchising. J Bus Ventur 14:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelner SP, Slavin L (1998) The competitive strategy of mutual learning. Train Dev 52(6):72–75

    Google Scholar 

  • King EB, de Chermont K, West W, Dawson JF, Hebl MR (2007) How innovation can alleviate negative consequences of demanding work contexts: the influence of climate for innovation on organizational outcomes. J Occup Organ Psychol 80:631–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott AM (2001) The dynamic value of hierarchy. Manag Sci 47(3):430–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuen-Hung T, Shu-Yi Y (2013) Firm innovativeness and business performance: the joint moderating effects of market turbulence and competition. Ind Mark Manag 42(8):1279–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine F (1992) Agency theory and franchising: some empirical results. RAND J Econ 23:263–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafontaine F, Shaw KL (2005) Targeting managerial control: evidence from franchising. Rand J Econ 36(1):131–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin K (1951) Field theory in social science. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin-Solomons, S. B. (1997). Innovation and authority in franchise system: toward a grounded theory of the plural form. PhD thesis, Cambridge University. http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/dae/people/lewin/thesis.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2001

  • Lewin-Solomons SB (1999) Innovation and authority in franchise system: an empirical exploration of the plural form. Journal paper No. J-18005 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Project No. 3530

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin-Solomons SB (2000) Innovation and authority in franchise systems: an empirical exploration of the plural form. Unpublished Working Paper. University of Cambridge, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu AMM, Chan IYS (2017) Understanding the interplay of organizational climate and leadership in construction innovation. J Manag Eng 33(3):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallapragada G, Srinivasan R (2017) Innovativeness as an unintended outcome of franchising: insights from restaurant chains. Decis Sci 48(6):1164–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolis C, Dahlstrom R, Nygaard A (1995) A preliminary investigation of ownership conversions in franchised distribution systems. J Appl Bus Res 11(2):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez MT, Galindo M-A, Sastre M-A (2014) Franchise, innovation and entrepreneurship. Serv Ind J 34(9–10):843–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael SC (2000) The effect of organizational form on quality: the case of franchising. J Econ Behav Organ 43:295–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael SC (2003) First mover advantage through franchising. J Bus Ventur 18:61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler AP (1990) An empirical analysis of a firm’s decision to franchise. Econ Lett 34:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkler AP (1992) Why firms franchise: a search cost theory. J Inst Theor Econ 148:240–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran ET, Volkwein JF (1992) The cultural approach to the formation of organizational climate. Hum Relat 45(1):19–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moukwa M (1995) A structure. To Foster creativity: an industrial experience. J Creat Behav 29(1):54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noren DL (1990) The economics of the Golden arches: a case study of the McDonald’s system. Am Econ 34(2):60–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott JS (1989) The organizational culture perspective. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Panuwatwanich K, Stewart RA, Mohamed S (2008) The role of climate for innovation in enhancing business performance: the case of design firms. Eng Const Archit Manag 15(5):407–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo-del-Val M, Martinez-Fuentes C, Lopez-Sanchez I, Minguela-Rata B (2014) Franchising: the dilemma between standardisation and flexibility. Serv Ind J 34(9–10):828–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry CV (1987) Creating the right climate for innovation, Director, April, p. 53

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrigot R, Herrbach O (2012) The plural form from the inside: a study of franchisee perception of company-owned outlets within their network. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 40(7):544–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirkul H, Narasimham S, De P (1987) Firm expansion through franchising: a model and solution programming. Decis Sci 18:631–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston J (1989) Franchisees who think big. Venture 11(3):55–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers CR (1976) Toward a theory of creativity. In: Rothenberg A, Hausman CR (eds) The creativity question. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp 296–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin PH (1978) The theory of the firm and the structure of the franchise contract. J Law Econ 21:222–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B (1975) Organizational climates: an essay. Pers Psychol 28:447–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider B, Parkington JP, Buxton VM (1980) Employer and customer perceptions of service in banks. Adm Sci Q 25:252–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shockley J, Turner T (2016) A relational performance model for developing innovation and long-term orientation in retail franchise organizations. J Retail Consum Serv 32:175–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: Leinhardt (ed) Sociological methodology. American Sociological Association, Washington DC, pp 290–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon GT, Winslow EK, Tarabishy A (1998) The role of climate in fostering innovative behavior in entrepreneurial SMEs. In: Proceedings of the 1998 USASBE annual national conference, bright horizons for small business and entrepreneurship, Clearwater, Florida, 15–18, January

    Google Scholar 

  • Somech A, Drach-Zahavy A (2013) Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: the role of team composition and climate for innovation. J Manag 39(3):684–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson O, Sørensen JB (2001) Finding the right mix: organizational learning, plural forms and franchise performance. Strateg Manag J 22:713–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strutton D, Pelton LE, Lumpkin JR (1995) Psychological climate in franchising system channels and franchisor-franchisee solidarity. J Bus Res 34(2):81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G, Jensen RJ (2008) Growing through copying: the negative consequences of innovation on franchise network growth. Res Policy 37:1732–1741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner T, Pennington WW III (2015) Organizational networks and the process of corporate entrepreneurship: how the motivation, opportunity, and ability to act affect firm knowledge, learning, and innovation. Small Bus Econ 45:447–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wattel H (1968–69) Are franchisors realistic and successful in their selection of franchisees? J Retail 44(4):54–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss M, Hoegl M, Gibbert M (2011) Making virtue of necessity: the role of team climate for innovation in resource-constrained innovation projects. J Prod Innov Manag 28(S1):196–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsperger J (2004) The dual network structure of the franchising firm: property rights, transaction cost and resource scarcity explanations. In: Windsperger J, Cliquet G, Hendrikse G, Tuunanen M (eds) Economics and management of franchising networks. Springer, Heidelberg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Windsperger J, Dant R (2006) Contractibility and ownership redirection in franchising: a property rights view. J Retail 82(3):259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S-H, Chi-Tsun Huang S, Daphne Tsai C-Y, Chen Y-C (2009) Service innovation in franchising convenience store: an exploratory study. Int J Electron Bus Manag 7(2):137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar D (1980) Safety climate in industrial organizations; theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol 65:96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar D (2000) A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccidents in manufacturing jobs. J Appl Psychol 85(4):587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gérard Cliquet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix Initial Items of the Innovation Climate Scale (14Items)

Appendix Initial Items of the Innovation Climate Scale (14Items)

Items

Questions

Notation scale (1 to 9)

Involvement

1. To what degree are your units available for innovations

Very weakly ⇨ Very strongly

Autonomy

2. To what degree is the autonomy of your franchisees in doing their jobs

Low autonomy ⇨ High autonomy

Openness, sharing

3. Within your network, people are open to others and share ideas

Strongly disagree ⇨ Strongly agree

Idea time

4. Your franchisees take time to think of new solutions and new ideas

5. Your owned units take time to think of new solutions and new ideas

Very rarely ⇨ Very frequently

Atmosphere

6. In general, the work atmosphere is relaxed and sympathetic

Strongly disagree ⇨ Strongly agree

Conflict

7. To what degree is there emotional tension in your network

A lot of conflict ⇨ Any conflict

Debate

8. To what degree is there the lively debate within stores

Rarely ⇨ Frequently

Idea support

9. All new ideas are warmly welcome by franchisees

10. Resources are always available to give new idea a try

Strongly disagree ⇨ Strongly agree

Risk-taking

11. Your franchisees have tendency to take risk rather than hesitate to accept an innovation

Hesitate a lot ⇨ Usually take risk

Dynamism

12. Degree of dynamism of stores

Encoded from percentage

Financial resources

13. Your franchisees have financial difficulties to follow the network evolution

A lot of difficulties ⇨ Any difficulty

Adoption

14. In your network, innovations are accepted

Very difficultly ⇨ Very easily

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Minh Ngoc, N., Cliquet, G. (2019). Innovation Climate in Plural Form Franchise Networks: The Mediator Role of Mutual Learning. In: Windsperger, J., Cliquet, G., Hendrikse, G., Srećković, M. (eds) Design and Management of Interfirm Networks. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29245-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics