Abstract
There is a large stock of masonry arch bridges built more than 100 years ago that are still in use in the world roadway and railway network. The restoration and conservation of this type of structures has become one of the main challenges of bridge engineering. As a first step, any intervention strategy requires an early stage consisting in the assessment of the structural safety (in the actual condition) of the masonry bridge. Only after that stage is performed, it is possible to design, if required, optimal repair interventions to bring the bridge to adequate safety level. In the first part of this paper, the seismic vulnerability assessment of a slender multi-span masonry arch bridge is presented. Results show that it is required to increase the flexural capacity of the structure. In the second part, an innovative intervention technique intended to increase the capacity of masonry arches is discussed. The proposed intervention technique consists on applying a layer of steel fiber reinforced mortar (SFRM) on the arch intrados. The behavior of a masonry arch strengthened with this technique is discussed by means of experimental and analytical results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sarhosis, V., De Santis, S., de Felice, G.: A review of experimental investigations and assessment methods for masonry arch bridges. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 12(11), 1439–1464 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1136655
Brencich, A., Morbiducci, R.: Masonry arches: historical rules and modern mechanics. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 1(2), 165–189 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/15583050701312926
Melbourne, C., Gilbert, M.: Behaviour of multiring brickwork arch bridges. Struct. Eng. Lond. 73(3), 39–47 (1995)
Tubaldi, E., Macorini, L., Izzuddin, B.A.: Three-dimensional mesoscale modelling of multi-span masonry arch bridges subjected to scour. Eng. Struct. 165, 486–500 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.031
Fanning, P.J., Boothby, T.E., Roberts, B.J.: Longitudinal and transverse effects in masonry arch assessment. Constr. Build. Mater. 15(1), 51–60 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-0618(00)00069-6
Brencich, A., De Francesco, U.: Assessment of multispan masonry arch bridges. I: simplified approach. J. Bridge Eng. 9(6), 582–590 (2004)
de Felice, G.: Assessment of the load-carrying capacity of multi-span masonry arch bridges using fibre beam elements. Eng. Struct. 31, 1634–1647 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.022
De Santis, S., de Felice, G.: A fibre beam-based approach for the evaluation of the seismic capacity of masonry arches. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43(11), 1661–1681 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2416
Grande, E., Milani, G.: Interface modeling approach for the study of the bond behavior of FRCM strengthening systems. Compos. Part B 141, 221–233 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.052
Pantò, B., Cannizzaro, F., Caddemi, S., Caliò, I., Chácara, C., Lourenço, P.B.: Nonlinear modelling of curved masonry structures after seismic retrofit through FRP reinforcing. Buildings 7(3), 79 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7030079
De, Santis S., Rossini, F., De Felice, G.: Full-scale tests on masonry vaults strengthened with Steel Reinforced Grout. Compos. Part B 141, 20–36 (2018)
Bertolesi, E., Milani, G., Carozzi, F.G., Poggi, C.: Ancient masonry arches and vaults strengthened with TRM, SRG and FRP composites: numerical analyses. Compos. Struct. 187, 385–402 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.021
Zampieri, P., Zanini, M.A., Modena, C.: Simplified seismic assessment of multi-span masonry arch bridges. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 13(9), 2629–2646 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9733-2
Zampieri, P., Tecchio, G., da Porto, F., Modena, C.: Limit analysis of transverse seismic capacity of multi-span masonry arch bridges. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 13(5), 1557–1579 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9664-3
Kindij, A., Ivanković, A.M., Vasilj, M.: Adjustment of small-span masonry arch bridges to present-day demands. Gradjevinar 66(1), 37–49 (2014)
Harvey, B.: Stiffness and damage in masonry bridges. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Bridge Engineering 165(3), 127–134 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1680/bren.11.00032
IRS 70778-3: Recommendations for inspection, assessment and maintenance of masonry arch bridges. 1st edition, February 2018
Sacco, E., Toti, J.: Interface elements for the analysis of masonry structures. Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech. 11(6), 354–373 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/15502287.2010.516793
Lourenco, B.P.B., Rots, J.G.: Multisurface interface model for analysis of masonry structures. J. Eng. Mech. 123(7), 660–668 (1997)
Andreotti, G., Graziotti, F., Magenes, G.: Detailed micro-modelling of the direct shear tests of brick masonry specimens: the role of dilatancy. Eng. Struct. 168, 929–949 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zampieri, P., Simoncello, N., Gonzalez-Libreros, J., Pellegrino, C. (2020). Retrofitting of Slender Masonry Arch Bridges. In: ArĂŞde, A., Costa, C. (eds) Proceedings of ARCH 2019. ARCH 2019. Structural Integrity, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29227-0_93
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29227-0_93
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29226-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29227-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)