Skip to main content

Uncertainty in Drug Discovery: Strategies, Heuristics and Technologies

Chapter for Uncertainty in Pharmacology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Uncertainty in Pharmacology

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 338))

  • 334 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we show how pharmacological researchers manage uncertainty when using high-throughput screening (HTS) techniques. HTS allows researchers to rapidly survey the activities of large numbers of chemical compounds against a biological target. However, not all molecules that show promising biological activity during screening will be suitable for clinical use. Researchers use the concept of druglikeness to manage this uncertainty about whether a biologically active molecule will be suitable for pharmacological use.

We introduce our approach in Sect. 7.1, during which we argue that the methodological choices we discuss are predicated on epistemic assumptions. We then give a brief overview of drug discovery in Sect. 7.2, and introduce HTS in more detail in Sect. 7.3. Section 7.4 then introduces druglikeness as an epistemic strategy for managing uncertainty, before discussing one of the heuristic tools, known as the rule of five, that is used by pharmacologists to reduce uncertainty about druglikeness. We conclude this chapter in more philosophical territory by considering druglikeness as a kind of extrapolation. Here, we argue that druglikeness does not seem to invoke biological mechanisms, but instead exploits the chemical capacities of molecules. The aim of this exploration is to provide a normative account of the role(s) played by values and philosophical assumptions in employing different epistemic and methodological strategies in scientific practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baxter, K., Horn, E., Gal-Edd, N., Zonno, K., O’Leary, J., Terry, P. F., & Terry, S. F. (2013). An end to the myth: There is no drug development pipeline. Science Translational Medicine, 5(171), 171cm1–171cm1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BNF. (n.d.). British National Formulary entry: Dantrolene sodium. Available online at https://doi.org/10.18578/BNF.207282907

  • Cartwright, N. (2009). What are randomised controlled trials good for? Philosophical Studies, 147(1), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N., & Pemberton, J. (2013). Aristotelian powers: Without them, what would modern science do? In J. Greco & R. Gross (Eds.), Powers and capacities in philosophy: The new Aristotelianism (pp. 93–112). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, G. S., & O’Donnell, J. T. (2006). Overview of the current processes of new drug discovery and development. In G. S. Charles & J. T. O’Donnell (Eds.), The process of new drug discovery and development. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drews, J. (2000). Drug discovery: A historical perspective. Science, 287(5460), 1960–1964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guala, F. (2010). Extrapolation, analogy, and comparative process tracing. Philosophy of Science, 77(5), 1070–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, B., Brideau, C., Pikounis, B., & Liaw, A. (2003). Statistical and graphical methods for quality control determination of high-throughput screening data. Journal of Biomolecular Screening, 8(6), 624–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommon, C. A., & Nelson, R. M. (2006). High-throughput screening: Enabling and influencing the process of drug discovery. In G. S. Charles & J. T. O’Donnell (Eds.), The process of new drug discovery and development. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, M. E., Horne, M. L., & Martz, R. (1982). Dantrolene in human malignant hyperthermia. Anesthesiology, 56(4), 254–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine, M. (2017). Animal extrapolation in preclinical studies: An analysis of the tragic case of TGN1412. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 61, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipinski, C., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B., & Feeney, P. (1997). Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews., 23, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macarron, R., & Hertzberg, R. P. (2009). Design and implementation of high-throughput screening assays. In W. P. Jansen & P. Bernasconi (Eds.), High throughput screening methods and protocols. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, R. (2015). Drugs: From discovery to approval. New Jersey: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parexel. (2003, August 4). Research and markets: PAREXEL’s pharmaceutical R&D statistical sourcebook. M2 Presswire. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/444265505?accountid=14511

  • Pereira, D. A., & Williams, J. A. (2007). Origin and evolution of high throughput screening. British Journal of Pharmacology, 152(1), 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentis, R. A., Lis, Y., & Walker, S. R. (1988). Pharmaceutical innovation by the seven UK-owned pharmaceutical companies (1964–1985). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 25, 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, S. (2002). Causation and explanation. Chesham: Acumen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steel, D. P. (2008). Across the boundaries: Extrapolation in biology and social science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erman Sözüdoğru .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sözüdoğru, E., Clarke, B. (2020). Uncertainty in Drug Discovery: Strategies, Heuristics and Technologies. In: LaCaze, A., Osimani, B. (eds) Uncertainty in Pharmacology. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 338. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29179-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics