Skip to main content

What the Near Future of Artificial Intelligence Could Be

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The 2019 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Lab

Part of the book series: Digital Ethics Lab Yearbook ((DELY))

Abstract

The chapter looks into the possible developments of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the near future and identifies two likely trends: (a) a shift from historical to synthetic data; and (b) a translation of difficult tasks (in terms of abilities) into complex ones (in terms of computation). It is argued that (a) and (b) will be pursued as development strategies of AI solutions whenever and as far as they are feasible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a reassuringly converging review based not on the nature of data or the nature of problems, but rather on the nature of technological solutions, based on a large scale review of the fortcoming literture on AI, see “We analyzed 16,625 papers to figure out where AI is headed next” https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612768/we-analyzed-16625-papers-to-figure-out-where-ai-is-headed-next/ (accessed 16 June 2019).

  2. 2.

    https://deepmind.com/blog/deepmind-ai-reduces-google-data-centre-cooling-bill-40/ (accessed 16 June 2019).

  3. 3.

    Masking is any information process used to conceal (hide or “mask”) sensititive or private information, e.g. by replacing or making unavailable part of the relevant data https://www.tcs.com/blogs/the-masking-vs-synthetic-data-debate (accessed 16 June 2019).

  4. 4.

    https://deepmind.com/blog/alphazero-shedding-new-light-grand-games-chess-shogi-and-go/ (accessed 16 June 2019).

  5. 5.

    One may argue that the data generated by AlphaZero are as synthetic as the data that would be generated by a human player playing against herself. This is correct—this is the idea behing the very process of synthesising anything from anything else—but also irrelevant here. Syntehtic data is used to stress the fact that the data avaialbel to the AI system are generated (mind, not collected, because the colleciotn could be of data generated by humans, for example) entirely by the AI system.

  6. 6.

    Put more epistemologically, with synthetic data AI enjoys the privileged position of a maker’s knowledge, who knows the intrinsic nature and working of something because it made that something (Floridi 2018).

  7. 7.

    https://securityintelligence.com/generative-adversarial-networks-and-cybersecurity-part-1/ (accessed 16 June 2019).

  8. 8.

    https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/7xn4wy/this-website-uses-ai-to-generate-the-faces-of-people-who-dont-exist (accessed 16 June 2019).

  9. 9.

    See for example Microsoft’s “Project InnerEye—Medical Imaging AI to Empower Clinicians”, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/project/medical-image-analysis/ (accessed 16 June 2019).

  10. 10.

    https://qz.com/966882/robots-cant-lace-shoes-so-sneaker-production-cant-be-fully-automated-just-yet/ (accessed 16 June 2019).

  11. 11.

    I am not the first to make this point, see for example: https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/hard-things-easy-easy-things-hard/1498154 (accessed 16 June 2019).

  12. 12.

    http://www.moley.com/ (accessed 16 June 2019).

  13. 13.

    https://misorobotics.com/ (accessed 16 June 2019).

  14. 14.

    Strange things happen when the software does not work properly: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47336684 (accessed 16 June 2019).

  15. 15.

    https://helloeffie.com/ (accessed 16 June 2019).

  16. 16.

    https://foldimate.com/ (accessed 16 June 2019).

  17. 17.

    I would like to thank all members of the Digital Ethics Lab, OII, Univeristy of Oxford, for many discussions about some of the topics covered in this article, Nikita Aggarwal, Josh Cowls, Jessica Morley, David Sutcliffe, and Mariarosaria Taddeo for their hugely helpful coments on several drafts, and the editors of the volume, Christoper Burr and Silvia Milano, for their constructive feedback on the last version.

References

  • Arora, Sanjeev, and Boaz Barak. 2009. Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Murray, A. Joseph Hoane Jr., and Feng-hsiung J. Hsu. 2002. Deep Blue. Artificial Intelligence 134 (1–2): 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corea, Francesco. 2019. An Introduction to Data. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, Kate, and Jason Schultz. 2014. Big Data and Due Process: Toward a Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms. BCL Review 55: 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fauw, Jeffrey, Joseph R. Ledsam, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Stanislav Nikolov, Nenad Tomasev, Sam Blackwell, Harry Askham, Xavier Glorot, Brendan O’Donoghue, Daniel Visentin, George van den Driessche, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Clemens Meyer, Faith Mackinder, Simon Bouton, Kareem Ayoub, Reena Chopra, Dominic King, Alan Karthikesalingam, Cían O. Hughes, Rosalind Raine, Julian Hughes, Dawn A. Sim, Catherine Egan, Adnan Tufail, Hugh Montgomery, Demis Hassabis, Geraint Rees, Trevor Back, Peng T. Khaw, Mustafa Suleyman, Julien Cornebise, Pearse A. Keane, and Olaf Ronneberger. 2018. Clinically Applicable Deep Learning for Diagnosis and Referral in Retinal Disease. Nature Medicine 24 (9): 1342–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estevez, David, Juan G Victores, Raul Fernandez-Fernandez, and Carlos Balaguer. 2017. Robotic Ironing with 3D Perception and Force/Torque Feedback in Household Environments. In 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, Luciano. 2008a. The Method of Levels of Abstraction. Minds and Machines 18 (3): 303–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b. Understanding Epistemic Relevance. Erkenntnis 69 (1): 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Information: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Big Data and Their Epistemological Challenge. Philosophy & Technology 25 (4): 435–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Ethics of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014a. The Fourth Revolution – How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014b. Technoscience and Ethics Foresight. Philosophy & Technology 27 (4): 499–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Digital’s Cleaving Power and Its Consequences. Philosophy & Technology 30 (2): 123–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. What the Maker’s Knowledge Could Be. Synthese 195 (1): 465–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. The Logic of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, Luciano, and Jeff W. Sanders. 2004. On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines 14 (3): 349–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, Luciano, Mariarosaria Taddeo, and Matteo Turilli. 2009. Turing’s Imitation Game: STILL an Impossible Challenge for All Machines and Some Judges––An Evaluation of the 2008 Loebner Contest. Minds and Machines 19 (1): 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow, Ian, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Generative Adversarial Nets. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Bill, Julia Stoyanovich, Haoyue Ping, Bernease Herman, and Matt Gee. 2017. Synthetic Data for Social Good. arXiv:1710.08874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Huiying, Brian Y. Tsui, Hao Ni, Carolina C.S. Valentim, Sally L. Baxter, Guangjian Liu, Wenjia Cai, Daniel S. Kermany, Xin Sun, Jiancong Chen, Liya He, Jie Zhu, Pin Tian, Hua Shao, Lianghong Zheng, Rui Hou, Sierra Hewett, Gen Li, Ping Liang, Xuan Zang, Zhiqi Zhang, Liyan Pan, Huimin Cai, Rujuan Ling, Shuhua Li, Yongwang Cui, Shusheng Tang, Hong Ye, Xiaoyan Huang, Waner He, Wenqing Liang, Qing Zhang, Jianmin Jiang, Wei Yu, Jianqun Gao, Wanxing Ou, Yingmin Deng, Qiaozhen Hou, Bei Wang, Cuichan Yao, Yan Liang, Shu Zhang, Yaou Duan, Runze Zhang, Sarah Gibson, Charlotte L. Zhang, Oulan Li, Edward D. Zhang, Gabriel Karin, Nathan Nguyen, Xiaokang Wu, Cindy Wen, Jie Xu, Wenqin Xu, Bochu Wang, Winston Wang, Jing Li, Bianca Pizzato, Caroline Bao, Daoman Xiang, Wanting He, Suiqin He, Yugui Zhou, Weldon Haw, Michael Goldbaum, Adriana Tremoulet, Chun-Nan Hsu, Hannah Carter, Long Zhu, Kang Zhang, and Huimin Xia. 2019. Evaluation and Accurate Diagnoses of Pediatric Diseases Using Artificial Intelligence. Nature Medicine 25: 433–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John, Marvin L. Minsky, Nathaniel Rochester, and Claude E. Shannon. 2006. A proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, August 31, 1955. AI Magazine 27 (4): 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblueth, Arturo, and Norbert Wiener. 1945. The Role of Models in Science. Philosophy of Science 12 (4): 316–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Stuart J., and Peter Norvig. 2010. Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. 3rd, International ed. Boston/London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, David, Thomas Hubert, Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Matthew Lai, Arthur Guez, Marc Lanctot, Laurent Sifre, Dharshan Kumaran, Thore Graepel, Timothy Lillicrap, Karen Simonyan, and Demis Hassabis. 2018. A General Reinforcement Learning Algorithm that Masters Chess, Shogi, and Go Through Self-Play. Science 362 (6419): 1140–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipser, Michael. 2012. Introduction to the Theory of Computation. 3rd ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, Alan Mathison. 1950. Computing machinery and intelligence. Minds and Machines 59: 433–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, David S., Jenny Krutzinna, Ian N. Bruce, Christopher E.M. Griffiths, Iain B. McInnes, Michael R. Barnes, and Luciano Floridi. 2019. Clinical Applications of Machine Learning Algorithms: Beyond the Black Box. British Medical Journal 364: l886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was partly supported, at different stages, by Privacy and Trust Stream—Social lead of the PETRAS Internet of Things research hub (PETRAS is funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), grant agreement no. EP/N023013/1), Facebook, Google, and Microsoft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luciano Floridi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Floridi, L. (2020). What the Near Future of Artificial Intelligence Could Be. In: Burr, C., Milano, S. (eds) The 2019 Yearbook of the Digital Ethics Lab. Digital Ethics Lab Yearbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29145-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics