A TEFL Virtual Reality System for High-Presence Distance Learning

  • Steven H. UruetaEmail author
  • Tetsuro Ogi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1036)


VR technologies can be effective for distance learning. However, currently available virtual reality systems for teaching English as a foreign language (TEFL) are limited: they are often a supplementary experience within a traditional classroom or do not offer a high level of student-teacher interaction. This research considers an HMD-based platform with two linked subsystems to address these issues. The first is a series of high-presence learning scenarios with roles played by the student(s) and teacher through avatars. The second is an interactive web portal within the VR environment that allows for learning, testing, and feedback. In order to assess the potential of this proposed system, student learning outcomes and ease of use are evaluated through preliminary testing, and this research also posits a more comprehensive system for managing longer-term courses.


  1. 1.
    Bonner, E., Reinders, H.: Augmented and virtual reality in the language classroom: practical ideas. Teach. Engl. Technol. 18(3), 33–53 (2018). IATEFL PolandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mostafa, J.E., Mohsen, H.: Exploiting adventure video games for second language vocabulary recall: a mixed-methods study. Innov. Lang. Learn. Teach. 13(1), 61–75 (2019). Taylor and FrancisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, K.: The MORPG-based learning system for multiple courses: a case study on computer science curriculum. Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol. 13(1), 102–123 (2015). IGI GlobalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chris, D.: Introduction to virtual reality in education. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 2(1–2), 7–9 (2009). The Educational Approaches to Virtual Reality Technologies Laboratory, University of IoanninaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thorsteinsson, G., Page, T., Lehtonen, M., Ha, J.G.: Innovation education enabled through a collaborative virtual reality learning environment. J. Educ. Technol. 3(3), 10–22 (2006). I-Manager JournalsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim, H., Ke, F.: OpenSim-supported virtual learning environment: transformative content representation, facilitation, and learning activities. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 54(2), 147–172 (2016). SAGE PublicationsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper, G., Park, H., Nasr, Z., Thong, L.P., Johnson, R.: Using virtual reality in the classroom: preservice teachers’ perceptions of its use as a teaching and learning tool. Educ. Media Int. 56(1), 1–13 (2019). RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reitz, L., Sohny, A., Lochmann, G.: Computer-assisted language learning: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. 6(2), 46–61 (2019). IGI GlobalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reitz, L., Sohny, A., Lochmann, G.: VR-Based Gamification of communication training and oral examination in a second language. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. 6(2), 46–61 (2016). IGI GlobalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson, P.L., Price, M., Edwards, S.M., Obasaju, M.A., Schmertz, S.K., Zimand, E., Calamaras, M.R.: Virtual reality exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 81(5), 751–760 (2013). American Psychological AssociationCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yildirim, G., Yildirim, S., Dolgunsoz, E.: The Effect of VR and traditional videos on learner retention and decision making. World J. Educ. Technol. Curr. Issues 11(1), 21–29 (2019). SciencePark ResearchCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mirzaei, M.S., Zhang, Q., van der Struijk, S., Nishida, T.: Language learning through conversation envisioning in virtual reality: a sociocultural approach. In: EuroCALL, Jyväskylä, August 26 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Willis, J.: A Framework for Task-based Learning, 4th edn. Longman, Harlow (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bryan, J., Karshmer, E.: Assessment in the one-shot session: using pre- and post-tests to measure innovative instructional strategies among first-year students. Coll. Res. Libr. 74(7), 574–586 (2013). Association of College and Research LibrariesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burton, R.: Quantifying the effects of chance in multiple choice and true/false tests: question selection and guessing of answers. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 26(1), 41–50 (2001). RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th edn, p. 238. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rochlen, L.R., Levine, R., Tait, A.R.: First-person point-of-view-augmented reality for central line insertion training: a usability and feasibility study. Simul. Healthc. 12(1), 57–62 (2001). RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li, S., Chen, Y., Wittinghill, D.M., Vorvoreanu, M.: A pilot study exploring augmented reality to increase motivation of chinese college students learning English. In: ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, 15–18 June (2014)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gorham, T., Jubaed, S., Sanyal, T., Starr, E.: Assessing the efficacy of VR for foreign language learning using multimodal learning analytics. In: Professional Development in CALL: A Selection of Papers, EuroCALL Teacher Education SIG, pp. 101–116 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Magaki, T., Vallance, M.: Measuring reduction methods for VR sickness in virtual environments. Int. J. Virtual Pers. Learn. Environ. 7(2), 27–43 (2017). IGI GlobalCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Wojdynski, T.: Students’ attitudes toward high-immersion virtual reality assisted language learning. In: EuroCALL, Jyväskylä, 22–25 August 2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of System Design and ManagementKeio UniversityYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations