Skip to main content

The Neuroscience of Team Collaboration During a Design Thinking Event in Naturalistic Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Understanding Innovation ((UNDINNO))

Abstract

While previous studies have begun to investigate the neuroscience of design thinking, current knowledge is still limited. One limitation faced to date, is the need for a naturalistic design methodology that can incorporate the inherit properties of design thinking in a neuroscientific design. Here we will introduce the concept of neuroscience in design thinking both at the individual level as well as in teams and propose an experimental design to study the neuroscience of design that imposes as little constraints as possible on the natural flow of team collaboration during a design thinking event.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexiou, K., et al. (2009). Exploring the neurological basis of design cognition using brain imaging: some preliminary results. Design Studies, 30(6), 623–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, A. R., et al. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in cognitive sciences, 8(4), 170–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. M., et al. (2016). Sex differences in neural and behavioral signatures of cooperation revealed by fNIRS hyperscanning. Scientific reports, 6, 26492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruah, J., & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Enhancing group creativity: The search for synergy. In Creativity in groups (pp. 29–56), Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaty, R. E., et al. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific reports, 5, 10964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begliomini, C., Cavallo, A., Manera, V., Becchio, C., Stramare, R., Miotto, D., & Castiello, U. (2017). Potential for social involvement modulates activity within the mirror and the mentalizing systems. Scientific reports, 7(1), 14967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, S. H., et al. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The revised neo personality inventory (neo-pi-r). The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, 2(2), 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, X., et al. (2011). A quantitative comparison of NIRS and fMRI across multiple cognitive tasks. Neuroimage, 54(4), 2808–2821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, X., et al. (2012). NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals increased interpersonal coherence in superior frontal cortex during cooperation. Neuroimage, 59(3), 2430–2437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delis, D. (2001). Delis-Kaplan executive function scale (D-KEFS). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar, M., et al. (2015). Empirical studies of designer thinking: past, present, and future. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(2), 021101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellamil, M., et al. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. Neuroimage, 59(2), 1783–1794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron, 50(4), 531–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funane, T., et al. (2011). Synchronous activity of two people’s prefrontal cortices during a cooperative task measured by simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 16(7), 077011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garavan, H., et al. (1999). Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event-related functional MRI study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(14), 8301–8306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. J., et al. (2010). Involvement of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in ill-structured design cognition: an fMRI study. Brain Research, 1312, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J., et al. (2018). A cross-brain neural mechanism for human-to-human verbal communication. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 13(9), 907–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holper, L., et al. (2012). Between-brain connectivity during imitation measured by fNIRS. Neuroimage, 63(1), 212–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., & Dapretto, M. (2006). The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(12), 942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J., et al. (2015). Leader emergence through interpersonal neural synchronization. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 201422930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J., et al. (2012). Neural synchronization during face-to-face communication. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(45), 16064–16069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowatari, Y., et al. (2009). Neural networks involved in artistic creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 30(5), 1678–1690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, L. (2018). The cognitive neuroscience of design creativity. Journal of Experimental Neuroscience, 12, 1179069518809664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limb, C. J., & Braun, A. R. (2008). Neural substrates of spontaneous musical performance: An fMRI study of jazz improvisation. PLoS ONE, 3(2), e1679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N., Mok, C., Witt, E. E., Pradhan, A. H., Chen, J. E., & Reiss, A. L. (2016). NIRS-based hyperscanning reveals inter-brain neural synchronization during cooperative Jenga game with face-to-face communication. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 10, 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, K., et al. (2018). Cooperation makes a group be more creative. Cerebral Cortex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayseless, N., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. (2015). Enhancing verbal creativity: modulating creativity by altering the balance between right and left inferior frontal gyrus with tDCS. Neuroscience, 291, 167–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monden, Y., et al. (2012). Clinically-oriented monitoring of acute effects of methylphenidate on cerebral hemodynamics in ADHD children using fNIRS. Clinical Neurophysiology, 123(6), 1147–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, P. R., et al. (2002). Hyperscanning: simultaneous fMRI during linked social interactions, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osaka, N., et al. (2015). How two brains make one synchronized mind in the inferior frontal cortex: fNIRS-based hyperscanning during cooperative singing. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 1811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., et al. (2018). Interpersonal synchronization of inferior frontal cortices tracks social interactive learning of a song. Neuroimage, 183, 280–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saggar, M., et al. (2015). Pictionary-based fMRI paradigm to study the neural correlates of spontaneous improvisation and figural creativity. Scientific reports, 5, 10894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3–4), 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stempfle, J., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2002). Thinking in design teams-an analysis of team communication. Design Studies, 23(5), 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, G. J., et al. (2010). Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(32), 14425–14430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. (1974). The torrance tests of creative thinking-TTCT manual and scoring guide: Verbal test a, figural test. Lexington, KY: Ginn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M.-Y., et al. (2018). Concurrent mapping of brain activation from multiple subjects during social interaction by hyperscanning: a mini-review. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 8(8), 819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2011). WASI-II: Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. PsychCorp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue, H., et al. (2018). Cooperation makes two less-creative individuals turn into a highly-creative pair. Neuroimage, 172, 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naama Mayseless .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mayseless, N., Hawthorne, G., Reiss, A. (2020). The Neuroscience of Team Collaboration During a Design Thinking Event in Naturalistic Settings. In: Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (eds) Design Thinking Research . Understanding Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28960-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics