Skip to main content

DT@IT Toolbox: Design Thinking Tools to Support Everyday Software Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Thinking Research

Part of the book series: Understanding Innovation ((UNDINNO))

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that design thinking can contribute to agile software development by increasing attention towards user needs as well as collaboration in interdisciplinary teams. However, there is a lack of understanding and support on how to facilitate the integration of design thinking activities into the daily work of agile development teams. Our work extends existing research on integrating design thinking with agile software development methodologies by developing and validating a toolbox that software teams can use in their everyday work. We present the DT@IT Toolbox, a collection of design thinking methods targeted at design thinking novices that aims to support everyday software development activities. The toolbox was evaluated with a team from an SME based in Germany over a period of 12 weeks. As a result, participants reported that using the DT@IT Toolbox led to a better communication within the team, enhanced problem-solving skills, increased empathy towards users and led to a better understanding of the users needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aerssen, B., Buchholz, C., Burkhardt, N., Ernst, A., Rings, J., et al. (2018). Das große Handbuch innovation: 555 Methoden und Instrumente für mehr Kreativität und Innovation im Unternehmen. Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K., Beedle, M., Van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., et al. (2001). Manifesto for agile software development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belshee, A. (2005). Promiscuous pairing and beginner’s mind: Embrace inexperience (agile programming). Agile Development Conference (ADC’05) (pp. 125–131).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauneck, P., Urbanek, R., & Zimmermann, F. (1995). Methodensammlung: Anregungen und Beispiele für die Moderation. Verlag für Schule und Weiterbildung: Dr.-Verlag Kettler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M., & Rauth, I. (2014). Exploring the use of design thinking in large organizations: Towards a research agenda. Swedish Design Research Journal, 1(14), 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K., & Smith, R. (2008). Unleashing the power of design thinking. Design Management Review, 19(3), 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2003). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design (Vol. 4).

    Google Scholar 

  • d.School Stanford. (2018). Design thinking bootleg.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Langhe, B., Bart, P., & Larrick, R. (2017). Linear thinking in a nonlinear world. Harvard Business Review, 95(3), 130–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Paula, D., Dobrigkeit, F., & Cormican, K. (2018). Design thinking capability model (DTCM): A framework to map out design thinking capacity in business organisations (pp. 557–566).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrigkeit , F., & de Paula, D. (2019). Manifestations of design thinking within software development. In Proceedings of ECIS19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrigkeit, F., de Paula, D., & Uflacker, M. (2018). InnoDev—A software development methodology integrating design thinking, scrum and lean startup. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking—Research looking further: Design thinking beyond solution-fixation, Understanding Innovation, (pp. 199–228). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9), 833–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eames, C., & Eames, R.(1977). Powers of ten. (film). Santa Monica: Eames Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, J., Lyytinen, K., & Siau, K. (2005). Agile modeling, agile software development, and extreme programming: The state of research. Journal of Database Management, 16(4), 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, J., Noble, J., & Biddle, R. (2007). Agile development iterations and UI design. In AGILE 2007 (AGILE 2007) (pp. 50–58). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2014) An introduction to qualitative research, 5th ed. Sage Publications Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, U., & Inge, T. (2013) The integration of design thinking and lean software development from the perspective of product owners and scrum masters. Master’s thesis, CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glomann, L. (2018). Introducing ’human-centered agile workflow’ (HCAW)—An agile conception and development process model. In T. Ahram & C. Falcão (Eds.), Advances in usability and user experience (Vol. 607, pp. 646–655). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S., Carpendale, S., & Marquardt, N., & Buxton, B. (2011). Sketching user experiences: The workbook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, E. (2014). Why startups fail, according to their founders. Retrieved September, 20, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman-Kahn, B., & Rosensweig, R. (2012). Skip the silver bullet: Driving innovation through small bets and diverse practices. Leading Through Design, 815–829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J., & Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In Proceedings of PDC (Vol. 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurusamy, K., Srinivasaraghavan, N., & Adikari, S. (2016). An integrated framework for design thinking and agile methods for digital transformation. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability: Design thinking and methods (Vol. 9746, pp. 34–42). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanington, B., & Martin, B. (2012). Universal methods of design: 100 ways to research complex problems. Develop innovative ideas, and design effective solutions: Rockport Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, A. (2015). Empathy and experiential learning: How a community-based project enhances the college experience. Ph. D. thesis, University Honors College, Middle Tennessee State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, T., & Meyer, J. (2012). Intertwining lean and design thinking: Software product development from empathy to shipment. In A. Maedche, A. Botzenhardt, & L. Neer, (Eds.), Software for People: Fundamentals, Trends and Best Practices, Management for Professionals (pp. 217–237). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31371-4_13.

  • Hitchcock, D., & Taylor, A. (2003). Simulation for inclusion... true user-centred design? In Include 2003 Conference Proceedings (pp. 105–110).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, M. (2009). How tangible is your strategy? How design thinking can turn your strategy into reality. Journal of Business Strategy, 30(2/3), 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDEO. (2003). IDEO method cards: 51 ways to inspire design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalleh, S. (2013). Co-designing an EC135 air ambulance cabin, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2013). How to give orientation and inspiration to design thinking novices regarding prototyping methods? (p. 10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann, J., Sharp, H., & Blandford, A. (2009). The importance of identity and vision to user experience designers on agile projects. In 2009 Agile Conference (pp. 11–18). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V. (2012). 101 design methods: A structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, W. -C. (2001). How to design a questionnaire. student BMJ, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewrick, M., Link, P., Leifer, L., & Langensand, N. (Eds.). (2017). Das design thinking playbook: mit traditionellen, aktuellen und zukünftigen Erfolgsfaktoren. Vahlen. OCLC: 958007004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, T., Meinel, C., & Wagner, R. (2011). Design thinking: A fruitful concept for IT development? In C. Meinel, L. Leifer, & H. Plattner (Eds.), Design Thinking, Understanding Innovation (pp. 3–18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13757-0_1.

  • Mahmoud-Jouini, S. B., Midler, C., & Silberzahn, P. (2016). Contributions of design thinking to project management in an innovation context: Contributions of design thinking to project management in an innovation context. Project Management Journal, 47(2), 144–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2010). Design thinking: Achieving insights via the “knowledge funnel”. Strategy & Leadership, 38(2), 37–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinel, C., Rhinow, H., & Köppen, E. (2013). Design thinking prototyping cardset. Hasso Plattner Institut für Softwaretechnik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miaskiewicz, T., & Kozar, K. A. (2011). Personas and user-centered design: How can personas benefit product design processes? Design Studies, 32(5), 417–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. (2012). User experience design: Mit erlebniszentrierter Softwareentwicklung zu Produkten, die begeistern. Berlin Heidelberg: X.media.press. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ohno, T. (1988). Toyota production system: Beyond large-scale production. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, L. E., Boone, A. E, & Engsberg, J. R. (2017). The creation and testing of a simulation-based workshop to increase level of understanding and empathy of eating disorders. Journal of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Disorders, 1(5), 270–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, T. Ø. (2016). UX Toolbox for Software Developers. Ph.D. thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, J., & Murray, M. C. (2010). Generativity: The new frontier for information and communication technology literacy. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 5, 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pojasek, R. B. (2000). Asking? Why?? Five times. Environmental Quality Management, 10(1), 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porcini, M. (2009). Your new design process is not enough-hire design thinkers!. Design Management Review, 20(3), 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., Tinker, A., & Power, J. (2016). The effectiveness of design thinking techniques to enhance undergraduate student learning. In Futurescan 3: Intersecting identities. Association of Fashion & Textiles (FTC), Loughborough University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, M. S., Losada Otalora, M., & Ramírez, G. C. (2017). How to create a realistic customer journey map. Business Horizons, 60(1), 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2001). Agile software development with scrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrat, O. (2017). The five whys technique (pp. 307–310). Springer Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, C. (2003). Paper prototyping: The fast and easy way to design and refine user interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohaib, O., Solanki, H., Dhaliwa, N., Hussain, W., & Asif, M. (2018). Integrating design thinking into extreme programming. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenwald, D. H. (1995). Contested collaboration: A descriptive model of intergroup communication in information system design. Information Processing & Management, 31(6), 859–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreng, N. R., McKinnon, M. C., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009) The Toronto empathy questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, S. (1970). Zen mind, beginner’s mind.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tam, M. (2001). Using paper prototyping as a usability testing methodology for web application development. Master’s thesis, School of Interactive Arts and Technologies—University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia, A., Person, O., & Snelders, D. (2013). An in-depth case study on the role of industrial design in a business-to-business company. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30(4), 363–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verganti, R. (1997). Leveraging on systemic learning to manage the early phases of product innovation projects. R&D Management, 27(4), 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, A., Runcie, E., & Morris, L. (2009). Embedding innovation: Design thinking for small enterprises. Journal of Business Strategy, 30(2/3), 78–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ximenes, B. H., Alves, I. N., & Araújo, C. C. (2015). Software project management combining agile, lean startup and design thinking. In A. Marcus (Ed.), Design, user experience, and usability: Design discourse (Vol. 9186, pp. 356–367). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Dobrigkeit .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dobrigkeit, F., Pajak, P., de Paula, D., Uflacker, M. (2020). DT@IT Toolbox: Design Thinking Tools to Support Everyday Software Development. In: Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (eds) Design Thinking Research . Understanding Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28960-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics