Abstract
Interprofessional education (IPE) often relies on simulation-based training to advance the education and performance of a multi-disciplinary team. As such, assessment and evaluation of these simulations must be carefully considered and designed to make best use of valuable time and resources within healthcare. This chapter will discuss the many strategies that may potentially be employed in IPE simulation-based training assessment and other considerations that affect the implementation of assessment.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Swing SR. The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach. 2007;29(7):648–54.
Tabish SA. Assessment methods in medical education. Int J Health Sci. 2010;2(2):3–7.
Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict pre-clerkship performance in medical school. Acad Med. 2004;79:S40–2.
Nasca TJ, Philibert I, Brigham T, Flynn TC. The next GME accreditation system—rationale and benefits. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):1051–6.
Frey-Vogel AS, Scott-Vernaglia SE, Carter LP, Huang GC. Simulation for milestone assessment: use of a longitudinal curriculum for pediatric residents. Simul Healthc. 2016;11:286–92.
Batmangelich S, Adamowski S. Maintenance of certification in the United States: a progress report. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2004;24:134–8.
Cox M, Irby DM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:387–96.
Rosen MA, Weaver SJ, Lazzara EH, Salas E, Wu T, Silvestri S, et al. Tools for evaluating team performance in simulation –based training. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3(4):353–9.
Salas E, Rosen MA, Held JD, Weissmuller JJ. Performance measurement in simulation-based training. Simul Gaming. 2009 June;40(3):328–76.
Reinert A. Assessment in medical education: a primer on methodology. News-Columbia University: College of Physicians and Surgeons. [Internet]. 2013 Sep 09. [cited 2017 Apr 10]. Available from: http://www.ps.columbia.edu/education/sites/default/files/student_life/Assessment%20in%20Medical%20Education%20-%20A%20Primer%20on%20Methodology%5B1%5D%20copy.pdf.
Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education (CAIPE). Interprofessional education – a definition. London: CAIPE Bulletin 13; 1997. p. 19.
Quilici AP, Bicudo AM, Gianotto-Oliveira R, Timerman S, Gutierrez F, Abrão KC. Faculty perceptions of simulation programs in healthcare education. Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:166–71.
Patton M. Utilization-focused evaluation. Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore: Sage Publishing; 2008. p. 4.
Salas E, Benishek L, Coultas C, Dietz A, Grossman R, Lazzara E. Team training essentials: a research-based guide, vol. 1. New York: Routledge; 2015.
Levett-Jones T, Lapkin S. A systematic review of the effectiveness of simulation debriefing in health professional education. Nurs Educ Today. 2014;34(6):58–63.
Boet S, Bould MD, Bruppacher HR, Desjardins F, Chandra DB, Naik VN. Looking in the mirror: self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(6):1377–81.
Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow R, Hamstra SJ. Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management. Anesthesiology. 2006;105(2):279–85.
Welke TM, LeBlanc VR, Savoldelli GL, Joo HS, Chandra DB, Crabtree DB, et al. Personalized oral debriefing versus standardized multimedia instruction after patient crisis simulation. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(1):183–9.
Byrne A, Sellen A, Jones J, Aitkenhead A, Hussain S, Gilder F. Effect of videotape feedback on anaesthetists performance while managing simulated anaesthetic crises: a multicentre study. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:176–9.
Dine C, Gersh R, Leary M, Riegel B, Bellini L, Abella B. Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and resuscitation training by combining audiovisual feedback and debriefing. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2817–22.
Grant JS, Moss J, Epps C, Watts P. Using video-facilitated feedback to improve student performance following high-fidelity simulation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2010;6:177–84.
Van Heukelom J, Begaz T, Treat R. Comparison of postsimulation debriefing versus in-simulation debriefing in medical simulation. Simul Healthc. 2010;5:91–7.
Grand JA, Pearce M, Rench TA, Chao GT, Fernandez R, Kozlowski SWJ. Going DEEP: Guidlenies for building simulation-based team assessments. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(5):436–48.
Salas E, Cannon-Bowers J, Smith-Jentsch K. Principles and strategies for team training. In: International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors, vol. 2. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.
Institute of Medicine. Conceptual framework for measuring the impact of IPE. Measuring the impact of interprofessional education on collaboration and outcomes. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2015. p. 25–38.
Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluation of training. In: Craig RL, Bittle LR, editors. Training and development handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967. p. 87–112.
Thistlethwaite J, Kumar K, Moran M, Saunders R, Carr S. An exploratory review of pre-qualification interprofessional education evaluations. J Interprof Care. 2015;29(4):292–7.
Rimando M, Brace AM, Namageyo-Funa A, Parr TL, Sealy D, Davis TL. Data collections challenges and recommendations for early career researchers. Qual Rep. 2015;20(12):2025–36.
Vincenzi DA. Human factors in simulation and training. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2009.
Azevedo R, Taub M, Mudrick N. Think-aloud protocol analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc; 2015. p. 764–6.
Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1993.
Shadbolt N. Eliciting expertise. In: Wilson JR, Corlett NE, editors. Evaluation of human work. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2005. p. 185–218.
Bainbridge L, Sanderson P. Verbal protocol analysis. In: Wilson JR, Corlett EN, editors. Evaluation of human work: a practical ergonomics methodology. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2005. p. 159–84.
Flanagan JC. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954;51:327–58.
Hassan E. Recall bias can be a threat to retrospective and prospective research designs. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;3(2):4.
Berelson B. Content analysis in communication research. New York: Free Press; 1952.
Nancarrow SA, Booth A, Ariss S, Smith T, Enderby P, Roots A. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11(19):1–11.
Given LM, editor. The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2008. p. 108–9.
Trochim W. Concept mapping. In: Mathison S, editor. Encyclopedia of evaluation [Internet]. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2005. p. 73–4.
Martin-Raugh M, Tannenbaum RJ, Tocci CM, Reese C. Behaviorally anchored rating scales: an application for evaluating teaching practice. Teach Teach Educ. 2016;59:414–9.
Schwab DP, Heneman HG III, DeCotiis TA. Behaviorally anchored rating scales: a review of the literature. Pers Psychol. 1975;28:549–62.
Rarick CA, Baxter G. Behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS): an effective performance appraisal approach. SAM Adv Manag J. 1986 Jan;51(1):36–9.
Wiersma U, Latham GP. The practicality of behavioral observation scales, behavioral expectation scales, and trait scales. Pers Psychol. 1986;39:619–28.
Fowlkes J, Dwyer DJ, Oser RL, Salas E. Event-based approach to training (EBAT). Int J Aviat Psychol. 1998;8(3):209–21.
Nau HR, editor. Perspectives on international relations. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press; 2009.
Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In: Klein KJ and Kozlowski SWJ, editors. Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2000. p. 3–90.
Driskell JE, Salas E. Collective behavior and team performance. Hum Factors. 1992;34:277–88.
DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2003.
Brannick MT, Prince C. An overview of team performance measurement. In: Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C, editors. Team performance assessment and measurement. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997. p. 3–16.
Gillespie R. Manufacturing knowledge: a history of the Hawthorne experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Webster, K.L.W., Tan, A.C., Unger, N., Lazzara, E.H. (2020). Considerations and Strategies for Assessing: Simulation-Based Training in Interprofessional Education. In: Paige, J., Sonesh, S., Garbee, D., Bonanno, L. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: InterProfessional Team Training and Simulation. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28845-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28845-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28844-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28845-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)