Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

  • 1101 Accesses

Abstract

Interprofessional education (IPE) is a necessary and important component of many prelicensure health professions’ curricula, reflecting an understanding of the critical role played by high-performing teams in healthcare. Simulation-based training offers many unique and impactful benefits as an instructional method in teamwork skills training; however, there are many factors to consider in creating and implementing an effective IPE simulation experience. We focus on IPE simulation as part of the initial instruction on the formation and function of high-performing teams for prelicensure learners in medicine, nursing, pharmacy and social work. We address logistical considerations from conception to execution, curriculum development, and preparation of faculty and students for the experience. We present lessons learned from our curriculum at the University of Texas Austin and acknowledge the need for more robust evaluation tools for the outcomes of IPE simulation training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Institute of Medicine. Measuring the impact of interprofessional education on collaborative practice and patient outcomes. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. 2015. [cited 2017 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.nap.edu/read/21726/chapter/1.

  2. Ericsson EA. Acquisition and maintenance of medical expertise: a perspective from the expert-performance approach with deliberate practice. Acad Med. 2015;90(11):1471–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nehring WM. U.S. boards of nursing and the use of high-fidelity patient simulators in nursing education. J Prof Nurs. 2008;24(1):109–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryall T, Judd BK, Gordon CJ. Simulation-based assessments in health professional education: a systematic review. J Multidisp Healthc. 2006;9:69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robertson JM, Dias RD, Yule S, Smink DS. Operative room team training with simulation: a systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marcus W. Applying a framework to healthcare simulation: micro, meso and macro levels. In: Nestel D, Kelly M, Jolly B, Watson M, editors. Healthcare simulation education: evidence, theory, and practice. 1st ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2017. p. 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Craddock D, O’Halloran C, McPherson K, Hean S, Hammick M. A top-down approach impedes the use of theory? Interprofessional educational leaders’ approaches to curriculum development and the use of learning theory. J Interprof Care. 2013;27(1):65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kahaleh AA, Danielson J, Franson KL, Nuffer WA, Umland EM. An interprofessional education panel on development, implementation, and assessment strategies. Am J Pharm Educ. 2015;79(6):78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Speakman E, Tagliareni E, Sherburne A, Sicks S. Guide to effective Interprofessional education experiences in nursing education. Washington, D.C.: National League for Nursing; 2016. [cited 2017 Mar 26]. Available from: http://www.nln.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/ipe-toolkit-krk-012716.pdf?sfvrsn=6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington (DC): Interprofessional Education Collaborative. 2016. [cited 2017 Mar 26]. Available from: https://ipecollaborative.org/uploads/IPEC-2016-Updated-Core-Competencies-Report__final_release_.PDF.

  11. MacKenzie DE, Doucet S, Nasser S, Godden-Webster AL, Andrews C, Kephart G. Collaboration behind-the-scenes: key to effective interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2014;28(4):381–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones BL, Luk JC, Phillips F. Transformative teams: co-teaching social work and medical students in interprofessional practice. Paper. Interprofessional and Transdisciplinary Practice Track. Council on Social Work Education 58th annual meeting. Washington, D.C. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masters K. Journey toward integration of simulation in a baccalaureate nursing curriculum. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(2):102–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Motola LA, Devine HS, Chun HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):e1511–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Emory J. Understanding backward design to strengthen curricular models. Nurse Educ. 2014;39(3):122–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Daugherty KK. Backward course design: making the end the beginning. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(6):135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldman E, Schroth WS. Perspective: deconstructing integration: a framework for the rational application of integration as a guiding curricular strategy. Acad Med. 2012;87(6):729–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van Teijlingen E, Hundley V. The importance of pilot studies. Nurs Stand. 2002;16(40):33–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Holden MD, Buck E, Luk J, Ambriz F, Boisaubin EV, Clark MA, Mihalic AP, Sadler JZ, Sapire K, Spike J, Vince A, Dalrymple JL. Professional identity formation: creating a longitudinal framework through TIME. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):761–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JL. Evaluating training programs. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  21. American Association of College of Nursing. The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Washington, D.C.: American Association of College of Nursing; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school: Standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree [Internet]. Association of American Medical Colleges and the American Medical Association, March 2017 [cited March 30, 2017]. Available from lcme.org.

  23. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation standard and key elements for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the Doctor of Pharmacy degree [Internet]. Chicago: Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education 2015 [cited March 30, 2017]. Available from ACPE.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Al-Elq AH. Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. J Fam Community Med 17.1 (2010): 35–40. PMC. Web. 26 Mar 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Eddie M, Hamilton C, Hammett O, Hyde P, Pryde K, Sykes K. Operationalizing a new emergency department: the role of simulation. In: Nestel D, Kelly M, Jolly B, Watson M, editors. Simulation education: evidence, theory and practice. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2018. p. 205–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Robertson J, Bandali K. Bridging the gap: enhancing interprofessional education using simulation. J Interprof Care. 2008;22(5):499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Peterson, DT, Watts, P, Epps, CA, White ML. Simulation faculty development: a tired approach. SimulHealthc. 2017. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000225. Accessed 11 April 2017.

  28. Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update. Washington, D.C.: Interprofessional Education Collaborative 2016 [cited 2017 Apr 11]. Available from https://ipecollaborative.org/uploads/IPEC-2016-Updated-Core-Competencies-Report__final_release_.PDF.

  29. Wang R, Shi N, Bai J, Zheng Y, Zhao Y. Implementation and evaluation of an interprofessional simulation-based education program for undergraduate nursing students in operating room nursing education: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Curran VR, Sharpe D, Forristall J, Flynn K. Attitudes of health sciences students towards interprofessional teamwork and education. Learn Health Soc Care. 2008;7(3):146–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Parsell G, Bligh J. The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Med Educ. 1999;33(2):95–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. McFadyen AK, Webster V, Strachan K, Figgins E, Brown H, McKechnie J. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale: a possible more stable sub-scale model for the original version of RIPLS. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(6):595–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Norris J, Carpenter JG, Eaton J, Guo JW, Lassche M, Pett MA, Blumenthal DK. The development and validation of the interprofessional attitudes scale: assessing the interprofessional attitudes of students in the health professions. Acad Med. 2015;90(10):1394–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Frankel A, Gardner R, Maynard L, Kelly A. Using the communication and teamwork skills (CATS) assessment to measure health care team performance. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33(9):549–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Olupeliyawa AM, O’Sullivan AJ, Hughes C, Balasooriya CD. The Teamwork Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (T-MEX): a workplace-based assessment focusing on collaborative competencies in health care. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):359–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Paige JT, Garbee DD, Kozmenko V, Yu Q, Kozmenko L, Yang T, Bonanno L, Swartz W. Getting a head start: high-fidelity, simulation-based operating room team training of interprofessional students. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(1):140–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly M. Brown .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Luk, J.C., Sanders, M.K., Young, V., Jones, B.L., Brown, K.M. (2020). Interprofessional Simulation in Prelicensure Learners. In: Paige, J., Sonesh, S., Garbee, D., Bonanno, L. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: InterProfessional Team Training and Simulation. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28845-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28845-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28844-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28845-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics