Skip to main content

Feeding and Nutrition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Topics and Controversies in Neonatology
  • 768 Accesses

Abstract

Nutritional care holds the key to optimising outcomes for preterm infants and is relevant to every healthcare practitioner on the neonatal unit. Without adequate nutrient intakes, time coordinated brain development and growth cannot be promoted, recovery from acute neonatal morbidities will be impaired, and long term organ, muscle and brain growth will be permanently affected. Recent studies have clarified the role of nutrient intakes in the first few days and have contributed to the evidence base for updated European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) parenteral nutrition consensus guidelines. However, controversy surrounding optimal amino acid intakes and the approach to energy intakes and hyperglycaemia persists. The incidence of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is increasing as early respiratory deaths decrease, but randomised controlled trials exploring the timing of initiation and speed of increase of milk feeds show little impact on the incidence of NEC and sepsis. Accumulating data continue to show a dose response benefit from the use of mother’s own milk in reducing NEC, sepsis and other common morbidities, however the benefits of donor human milk and probiotics remain hotly debated and clinical practice continues to vary widely. Further large scale randomised controlled trials will be needed to further improve care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yumani DFJ, Lafeber HN, van Weissenbruch MM. Dietary proteins and IGF I levels in preterm infants: determinants of growth, body composition, and neurodevelopment. Pediatr Res. 2014;77(1–2):156–63. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/pr.2014.172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stoltz Sjöström E, Lundgren P, Öhlund I, Holmström G, Hellström A, Domellöf M. Low energy intake during the first 4 weeks of life increases the risk for severe retinopathy of prematurity in extremely preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(2):F108–13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25678632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Embleton ND, Cleminson J, Zalewski S. What growth should we aim for in preterm neonates? Paediatr Child Health (Oxford). 2017;27(1):18–22. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1751722216301767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Corpeleijn WE, de Waard M, Christmann V, van Goudoever JB, Jansen-van der Weide MC, Kooi EMW, et al. Effect of donor milk on severe infections and mortality in very low-birth-weight infants: the early nutrition study randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(7):654–61. http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0183%5Cn. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27135598.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou J, Shukla VV, John D, Chen C. Human milk feeding as a protective factor for retinopathy of prematurity: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015;136(6):e1576–86. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2015-2372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Patel AL, Johnson TJ, Engstrom JL, Fogg LF, Jegier BJ, Bigger HR, et al. Impact of early human milk on sepsis and health-care costs in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2013;33(7):514–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Renfrew MJ, Craig D, Dyson L, McCormick F, Rice S, King SE, et al. Breastfeeding promotion for infants in neonatal units: a systematic review and economic analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(40):1–146, iii–iv. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19728934. [cited 2015 Jan 2]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Relton C, Strong M, Thomas KJ, Whelan B, Walters SJ, Burrows J, et al. Effect of financial incentives on breastfeeding: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2018;172(2):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cleminson JS, Zalewski SP, Embleton ND. Nutrition in the preterm infant: what’s new? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2016;19(3):220–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leaf A, Dorling J, Kempley S, McCormick K, Mannix P, Linsell L, et al. Early or delayed enteral feeding for preterm growth-restricted infants: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):e1260–8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22492770.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abbott J, Berrington J, Bowler U, Boyle EM, Dorling J, Embleton N, et al. The speed of increasing milk feeds: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17(1):39. http://bmcpediatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12887-017-0794-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Oddie S, Young L, McGuire W. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(8):CD001241. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001241.pub7. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005249.pub2/pdf/standard%5Cn. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152230.

  13. Klevebro S, Westin V, Stoltz Sjöström E, Norman M, Domellöf M, Edstedt Bonamy AK, et al. Early energy and protein intakes and associations with growth, BPD, and ROP in extremely preterm infants. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(3):1289–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stephens BE, Walden RV, Gargus RA, Tucker R, McKinley L, Mance M, Julie Nye BRV. First-week protein and energy intakes are associated with 18-month developmental outcomes in extremely low birth weight infants. Paediatrics. 2009;123(5):1337–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Joosten K, Embleton N, Yan W, Senterre T, Espr E. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Energy. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(6 Pt B):2309–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mihatsch W, Shamir R, van Goudoever JB, Fewtrell M, Lapillonne A. ESPEN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: guideline development process for the updated guidelines. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(6 Pt B):2306–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van Goudoever JB, Carnielli V, Darmaun D, Sainz de Pipaon M. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: amino acids. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(6 Pt B):2315–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mihatsch W, Fewtrell M, Goulet O, Molgaard C, Picaud J, Senterre T. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: calcium, phosphorus and magnesium. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(6 Pt B):2360–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mesotten D, Joosten K, van Kempen A, Verbruggen S, Espen E. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: carbohydrates. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(6 Pt B):2337–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jochum F, Moltu SJ, Senterre T, Nomayo A, Iacobelli S, Espen E, et al. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: fluid and electrolytes. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(6 Pt B):2344–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stensvold HJ, Strommen K, Lang AM, Abrahamsen TG, Steen EK, Pripp AH, et al. Early enhanced parenteral nutrition, hyperglycemia, and death among extremely low-birth-weight infants. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(11):1003–10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26348113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan C. The potential risks and benefits of insulin treatment in hyperglycaemic preterm neonates. Early Hum Dev. 2015;91(11):655–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beardsall K, Vanhaesebrouck S, Frystyk J, Ogilvy-Stuart AL, Vanhole C, van Weissenbruch M, et al. Relationship between insulin-like growth factor I levels, early insulin treatment, and clinical outcomes of very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2014;164(5):1038–1044.e1. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24518169. [cited 2015 Jan 2]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hojsak I, Colomb V, Braegger C, Bronsky J, Campoy C, Domellöf M, et al. ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition Position Paper. Intravenous lipid emulsions and risk of hepatotoxicity in infants and children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62(5):776–92. http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00005176-201605000-00019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Uthaya S, Liu X, Modi N. Nutritional evaluation and optimisation in neonates trial: is the protein-to-energy ratio important? Reply. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(6):1721–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Embleton NDE, Pang N, Cooke RJ, Background A. Postnatal malnutrition and growth retardation: an inevitable consequence of current recommendations in preterm infants? Pediatrics. 2001;107(2):270–3. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.107.2.270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ehrenkranz RA, Dusick AM, Vohr BR, Wright LL, Wrage LA, Poole WK. Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2006;117(4):1253–61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16585322. [cited 2015 Jan 2]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thureen PJ, Hay WW. Early aggressive nutrition in preterm infants. Semin Neonatol. 2001;6(5):403–15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11988030. [cited 2015 Jan 2]

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Blakstad EW, Strømmen K, Moltu SJ, Wattam-Bell J, Nordheim T, Almaas AN, et al. Improved visual perception in very low birth weight infants on enhanced nutrient supply. Neonatology. 2015;108(1):30–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Strommen K, Blakstad EW, Moltu SJ, Almaas AN, Westerberg AC, Amlien IK, et al. Enhanced nutrient supply to very low birth weight infants is associated with improved white matter maturation and head growth. Neonatology. 2015;107(1):68–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Strømmen K, Haag A, Moltu SJ, Veierød MB, Blakstad EW, Nakstad B, et al. Enhanced nutrient supply to very low birth weight infants is associated with higher blood amino acid concentrations and improved growth. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2017;18(0424):16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2017.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Embleton ND, Van Den Akker CHP. Early parenteral amino acid intakes in preterm babies: does NEON light the way? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(2):F92–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moltu SJ, Strømmen K, Blakstad EW, Almaas AN, Westerberg AC, Brække K, et al. Enhanced feeding in very-low-birth-weight infants may cause electrolyte disturbances and septicemia - A randomized, controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2013;32(2):207–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2012.09.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Embleton ND, Morgan C, King C. Balancing the risks and bene fits of parenteral nutrition for preterm infants: can we define the optimal composition? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(1):F72–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mulla S, Stirling S, Cowey S, Close R, Pullan S, Howe R, et al. Severe hypercalcaemia and hypophosphataemia with an optimised preterm parenteral nutrition formulation in two epochs of differing phosphate supplementation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102(5):F451–5. http://fn.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Morgan C, McGowan P, Herwitker S, Hart AE, Turner MA. Postnatal head growth in preterm infants: a randomized controlled parenteral nutrition study. Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):e120–8. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2013-2207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Koletzko B, Goulet O, Jochum F, Shamir R. Use of parenteral nutrition in the pediatric ICU: should we panic because of PEPaNIC? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017;20(3):201–3. http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00075197-201705000-00010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fivez T, Kerklaan D, Mesotten D, Verbruggen S, Wouters PJ, Vanhorebeek I, et al. Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill children. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(12):1111–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vanhorebeek I, Verbruggen S, Casaer MP, Gunst J, Wouters PJ, Hanot J, et al. Effect of early supplemental parenteral nutrition in the paediatric ICU: a preplanned observational study of post-randomisation treatments in the PEPaNIC trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;2600(17):1–9. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2213260017301868.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Deshpande G, Jape G, Rao S, Patole S. Benefits of probiotics in preterm neonates in low-income and medium-income countries: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e017638. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017638.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Gale C, Modi N, WHEAT Trial Development Group. Neonatal randomised point-of-care trials are feasible and acceptable in the UK: results from two national surveys. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(1):86–7. http://fn.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/archdischild-2015-308882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Battersby C, Marciano Alves Mousinho R, Longford N, Modi N. Use of pasteurised human donor milk across neonatal networks in England. Early Hum Dev. 2018;118:32–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.01.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Berrington JE, Hearn RI, Bythell M, Wright C, Embleton ND. Deaths in preterm infants: changing pathology over 2 decades. J Pediatr. 2012;160(1):49–53.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Battersby C, Longford N, Mandalia S, Costeloe K, Modi N. Incidence and enteral feed antecedents of severe neonatal necrotising enterocolitis across neonatal networks in England, 2012–13: a whole-population surveillance study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(1):43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30117-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Children’s cancer mortality. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/.

  46. Battersby C, Santhalingam T, Costeloe K, Modi N. Incidence of neonatal necrotising enterocolitis in high-income countries: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(2):F182–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Battersby C, Longford N, Costeloe K, Modi N. Development of a gestational age–specific case definition for neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(3):256–63. http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Quigley M, Embleton ND, McGuire W. Formula versus donor breast milk for feeding preterm or low birth weight infants (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;6:CD002971.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Silano M, Milani GP, Fattore G, Agostoni C. Donor human milk and risk of surgical necrotizing enterocolitis: a meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(3):1061–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.03.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. O’Connor DL, Gibbins S, Kiss A, Bando N, Brennan-Donnan J, Ng E, et al. Effect of supplemental donor human milk compared with preterm formula on neurodevelopment of very low-birth-weight infants at 18 months. JAMA. 2016;316(18):1897. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jama.2016.16144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Williams T, Nair H, Simpson J, Embleton N. Use of donor human milk and maternal breastfeeding rates: a systematic review. J Hum Lact. 2016;32:212–20. http://jhl.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0890334416632203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Li Y, Nguyen DN, de Waard M, Christensen L, Zhou P, Jiang P, et al. Pasteurization procedures for donor human milk affect body growth, intestinal structure, and resistance against bacterial infections in preterm pigs. J Nutr. 2017;147(6):1121–30. http://jn.nutrition.org/lookup/doi/10.3945/jn.116.244822.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Menon G, Williams TC. Human milk for preterm infants: why, what, when and how? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98(6):F559–62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23893267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Autran CA, Kellman B, bode L. Human milk oligosaccharide composition predicts risk of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants. Gut. 2018;67(6):1064–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Autran CA, Schoterman MHC, Jantscher-Krenn E, Kamerling JP, Bode L. Sialylated galacto-oligosaccharides and 2′-fucosyllactose reduce necrotising enterocolitis in neonatal rats. Br J Nutr. 2016;116(02):294–9. http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0007114516002038.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Manzoni P, Rizzollo S, Vain N, Mostert M, Stronati M, Tarnow-Mordi W, et al. Probiotics use in preterm neonates: what further evidence is needed? Early Hum Dev. 2011;87(Suppl 1):S3–4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21288665. [cited 2015 Jan 2].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tarnow-Mordi W, Soll RF. Probiotic supplementation in preterm infants: it is time to change practice. J Pediatr. 2014;164(5):959–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.12.050.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Modi N. Probiotics and necrotising enterocolitis: the devil (as always) is in the detail. Commentary on N. Ofek Shlomai et al.: probiotics for preterm neonates: what will it take to change clinical practice? (Neonatology 2014;105:64-70). Neonatology. 2014;105(1):71–3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24296920. [cited 2015 Jan 2].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Deshpande G, Rao S, Patole S. Probiotics in neonatal intensive care—back to the future. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(3):210–7. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ajo.12328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Embleton ND, Zalewski S, Berrington JE. Probiotics for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis and sepsis in preterm infants. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016;29(3):256–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Patel RM, Underwood MA. Probiotics and necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2018;27(12):39–46. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.11.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Thomas J. Probiotics for the prevention of NEC in VLBW infants: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Acta Paediatr. 2016;38(1):42–9.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Indrio F, Riezzo G, Tafuri S, Ficarella M, Carlucci B, Bisceglia M, et al. Probiotic supplementation in preterm: feeding intolerance and hospital cost. Nutrients. 2017;9(9):1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Rao SC, Athalye-jape GK, Deshpande GC. Probiotic supplementation and late-onset sepsis in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2016;137(3):e20153684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Alfaleh K, Anabrees J, Bassler D. Probiotics for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(3):CD005496.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Costeloe K, Hardy P, Juszczak E, Wilks M, Millar MR. Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 in very preterm infants: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2015;6736(15):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01027-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. El-Khuffash A, Unger S. The concept of milk kinship in Islam: issues raised when offering preterm infants of Muslim families donor human milk. J Hum Lact. 2012;28(2):125–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22311893. [cited 2015 Jan 2].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Ozdemir R, Ak M, Karatas M, Ozer A, Dogan DG, Karadag A. Human milk banking and milk kinship: perspectives of religious officers in a Muslim country. J Perinatol. 2015;35(2):137–41. http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/jp.2014.177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. van den Akker CHP, van Goudoever JB, Szajewska H, Embleton ND, Hojsak I, Reid D, et al. Probiotics for preterm infants: a strain specific systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;67(1):103–22. http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00005176-900000000-96905%0A. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29384838.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Embleton ND, Berrington JE, Dorling J, Ewer AK, Juszczak E, Kirby JA, et al. Mechanisms affecting the gut of preterm infants in enteral feeding trials. Front Nutr. 2017;4:14. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnut.2017.00014/full.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Schwartz S, Friedberg I, Ivanov IV, Davidson LA, Goldsby JS, Dahl DB, et al. A metagenomic study of diet-dependent interaction between gut microbiota and host in infants reveals differences in immune response. Genome Biol. 2012;13(4):r32. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3446306&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas D. Embleton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Embleton, N.D. (2020). Feeding and Nutrition. In: Boyle, E., Cusack, J. (eds) Emerging Topics and Controversies in Neonatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28829-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28829-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28828-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28829-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics