Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pregnancy–Related Complications and Preterm Delivery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Topics and Controversies in Neonatology

  • 783 Accesses

Abstract

Whilst most aspects of obstetrics impact on neonatal care, in this chapter, we have focussed on the areas that we consider have the greatest effect: prematurity and stillbirth prevention. The current knowledge regarding prematurity prevention relies on identification of women at highest risk of preterm birth.

New risk factors are now being identified, the most recent being previous cervical surgery and previous second stage Caesarean section. Interventions to prevent preterm birth are largely limited to the antenatal period and include cervical cerclage. However newer interventions are now being trialled including progesterone treatment and the use of the Arabin pessary.

Once preterm labour occurs, the focus is on optimising the condition of the preterm neonate by use of antenatal corticosteroids, antibiotics and magnesium sulfate, with careful consideration of mode of delivery. Whilst stillbirth prevention may not seem as relevant to neonatal care, it is a major international focus within obstetrics. The consequence of this is an inevitable increase in intervention in late pregnancy to deliver babies identified as at increased risk of adverse outcome, thereby increasing the incidence of iatrogenic prematurity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Saigal S, Doyle L. Preterm birth 3. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008;371:261–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldenberg R, Culhane J, Iams J, Romero R. Preterm birth 1. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371:75–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Haines N. Office of national statistics. Birth summary tables England and Wales 2016. Updated 2016. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthsummarytablesenglandandwales/2017. Accessed 19 Oct 2019.

  4. Iams J, Romero R, Culhane J, Goldenberg R. Preterm birth 2. Primary, secondary and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371:164–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharp N, Alfivirec Z. Provision and practice of specialist preterm labour clinics: a UK survey of practice. BJOG. 2014;121:417–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berghella V, Gimovsky A, Levine L, Vink J. Cesarean in the second stage: a possible risk factor for subsequent spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:1–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Watson H, Carter J, David A, Seed P, Shennan A. Full dilatation caesarean section: a risk factor for recurrent second-trimester loss and preterm birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96:1100–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood S, Tang S, Crawford S. Cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the risk of subsequent premature birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(63):e1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cong A, De Vries B, Ludlow J. Does previous caesarean section at full dilatation increase the likelihood of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;58:267–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nott J, Pervolaraki E, Benson A, et al. Diffusion tension imaging determines three-dimensional architecture of human cervix: a cross-sectional study. BJOG. 2018;125:812–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Corry E, Ramphul M, Rowan A, Segurado R, Mahony R, Keane D. Exploring full cervical dilatation caesarean sections—a retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;224:188–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Seal S, Dey A, Barman S, Kamilya G, Mukherji J, Onwude J. Randomized controlled trial of elevation of the fetal head with a fetal pillow during caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;133:178–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crane J. Use of transvaginal ultrasonography to predict preterm birth in women with a history of preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(5):640–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gotsch F, Romero R, Erez O. The preterm parturition syndrome and its implications for understanding the biology, risk assessment, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:5–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage. Interim report of the medical research council/royal college of obstetricians and gynaecologists multicentre randomized trial of cervical cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;95:437–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alfirevic Z, Stampalia T, Medley N. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing preterm birth in singleton pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD008991. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008991.pub3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meis P, Klebanoff M, Thom E. Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2379–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Da Fonseca E, Bittar R, Carvalho M, Zugaib M. Prophylactic administration of progesterone by vaginal suppository to reduce the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth in women at increased risk: a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:419–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fonseca E, Celik E, Parra M, Singh M, Nicolaides K. Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:462–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Norman J, Marlow N, Messow C, Shennan A, Bennett P, Thornton S. Vaginal progesterone prophylaxis for preterm birth (the OPPTIMUM study): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10033):2106–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Romero R, Nicolaides K, Conde-Agudelo A. Vaginal progesterone decreases preterm birth ≤34 weeks of gestation in women with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix: an updated meta-analysis including data from the OPPTIMUM study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:308–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. ACOG. Prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Practice bulletin 130. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:964–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Preterm labour and birth. NICE guideline NG25. Updated 2015. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng25.

  24. Hezelgrave N, Watson H, Ridout A. Rationale and design of SuPPoRT: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare three treatments: cervical cerclage, cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone, for the prevention of preterm birth in women who develop a short cervix. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hay P, Lamont R, Taylor-Robinson D, Morgan D, Ison C, Pearson J. Abnormal colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. BMJ. 1994;308:295–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Haahr T, Ersboll A, Karlsen M. Treatment of bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy in order to reduce the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery—a clinical recommendation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:850–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brocklehurst P, Jordon A, Heatley E, Milan S. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(1):CD000262.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gyetvai K, Hannah M, Hodnett E, Ohisson A. Tocolytics for preterm labour: a systematic review. Obstet Gynacol. 1999;94(869):877.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Flenady V, Reinebrant H, Liley H, Tambimuttu E, Papatosonis-Dimitri N. Oxytocin receptor antagonists for inhibiting preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(7):CD006169.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Peebles D, Kenyon A. Magneisum sulphate to prevent cerebral palsy following preterm birth. Scientific impact paper 29. Magnesium sulphate to prevent cerebral palsy following preterm birth scientific impact paper no. 29. RCOG. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rouse D, Hirtz D, Thom E, Varner M, Spong C, Mercer B. A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:895–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Costeloe K, Hennessy E, Haide S, Stacey F, Marlow N, Draper E. Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in england: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICURE studies). BMJ. 2012;345:7976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. David A, Soe A. Extreme prematurity and perinatal management. Obstetr Gynaecol. 2018;20(109):117.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Grabovac M, Karim J, Isayama T, Liyanage S, McDonald S. What is the safest mode of birth for extremely preterm breech singleton infants who are actively resuscitated? A systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125(6):652–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lorth E, Sentilhes M, Quere M, et al. Planned delivery route of preterm breech singletons and neonatal and 2-year outcomes: a population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2019;126:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Greene R, Fitzpatrick C, Turner M. What are the maternal implications of a classical caesarean section? J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;18:345–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kenyon S, Taylor D, Tarnow-Mordi W. Broad-spectrum antibiotics for spontaneous preterm labour: the ORACLE II randomised trial. ORACLE collaborative group. Lancet. 2001;357(9261):989–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease. BJOG. 2017;124(12):e280–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. De Bernis L, Kinney M, Stones W. The lancet ending preventable stillbirths series study group with the lancet ending preventable stillbirths series advisory group. stillbirths: Ending preventable deaths by 2030. Lancet. 2016;387:703–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. O’Connor D. Saving babies lives. A care bundle for reducing stillbirths. NHS England 26th. Updated 2016. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/saving-babies-lives-car-bundl.pdf. Accessed 19 Oct 2018.

  41. Flenady V, Wojcieszek A, Middleton P. The lancet ending preventable stillbirths study group and the lancet stillbirths in high income countries investigator group. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet. 2016;387:691–702.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Widdows K, Roberts S, Camacho E, Heazell A. Saving babies’ lives project impact and results evaluation (SPiRE): a mixed methodology study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;30(1):43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Jackson K, Hayes K, Hinshaw K. The relevance of non-technical skills in obstetrics and gynaecology. Obstetr Gynaecol. 2013;15(4):269–74.

    Google Scholar 

  44. National Quality Board. Never? Appendix 2, Department of Health Human Factors Reference Group interim report. Updated 2012. http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/DH-2.pdf. Accessed 30 Jul 2018.

  45. Gardosi J, Madurasinghe V, Williams M, Malik A, Francis F. Maternal and fetal risk factors for stillbirth: population based study. http://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f108.

  46. Gardosi J, Francis A, Turner S, Williams M. Customized growth charts: rationale, validation and clinical benefits. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218:S609–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Papageorghiou A, Ohuma E, Altman D. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the fetal growth longitudinal study of the INTERGROWTH-21st project. Lancet. 2014;384:869–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Francis A. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21st standards for the assessment of birthweight and stillbirth risk at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):S692–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. NICE. Hypertension in pregnancy guideline. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg107/resources/hypertension-in-pregnancy-diagnosis-and-management-pdf-35109334011877. Accessed 19 Oct 2018.

  50. DeVore G. The importance of the cerebroplacental ratio in the evaluation of fetal well-being in SGA and AGA fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):5–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Khalil A, Morales-Roselló J, Townsend R, et al. Value of third-trimester cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery doppler indices as predictors of stillbirth and perinatal loss. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(1):74–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dawes G, Lobb M, Moulden M, Redman C, Wheeler T. Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers. BJOG. 1992;99:791–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lisonkova S, Hutcheon J, Joseph K, et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-11-39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. NHS England. Saving Babies Lives Version 2. A care bundle for reducing perinatal mortality. Updated 2019. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/saving-babies-lives-care-bundle-version-two.pdf. Accessed 26 Jun 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK

    Suzanna Dunkerton & Penny C. McParland

Authors
  1. Suzanna Dunkerton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Penny C. McParland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Penny C. McParland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Sciences, George Davies Centre for Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

    Elaine M. Boyle

  2. Department of Health Sciences, George Davies Centre for Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

    Jonathan Cusack

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dunkerton, S., McParland, P.C. (2020). Pregnancy–Related Complications and Preterm Delivery. In: Boyle, E., Cusack, J. (eds) Emerging Topics and Controversies in Neonatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28829-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28829-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28828-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28829-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation