Skip to main content

Immunology in Tumor and Transplant

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urologic Principles and Practice

Part of the book series: Springer Specialist Surgery Series ((SPECIALIST))

  • 1182 Accesses

Abstract

The immune response is started any time the immune system encounters an allo-antigen (bacteria, tumor or heterologous graft, etc.). The immune response consists in three steps: recognition of the alloantigen, activation of the lymphocyte T, destruction of the target by cellular or humoral ways; and involve several actors: Antigen Presenting Cell (APC), lymphocyte T, B, macrophage, complement, etc.

In tumor immunology, two pathways allowing the tumor cell to escape the anti-tumoral immunity have been identified: the Programmed Death 1 (PD1) and Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated antigen 4 (CTLA4) immune checkpoints. PD1 and CTLA4 are the main targets of the most recent immunotherapies. Blocking one or other of these immune checkpoints leads to “release the brake” exerted by the cancer cells on the anti-tumoral immunity.

In renal transplantation, an immunosuppression therapy is necessary to avoid rejection. It consists in an “induction therapy” whose objective is to prevent the acute rejection, relayed by a maintenance long term immunosupressive treatment called “maintenance treatment”. By detailing the course and steps of the immune response, we expose in this chapter the modes of action of immunotherapies in the treatment cancer and immunosupressive treatments in kidney transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

APC:

Antigen presenting cell

CTLA4:

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4

HLA:

Human leukocyte antigen

MHC:

Major histocompatibility complex

PD1:

Programmed death 1

References

  1. Delves PJ, Roitt IM. The immune system. First of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(1):37–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Delves PJ, Roitt IM. The immune system. Second of two parts. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(2):108–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dausset J. The Hu-1 system. Presse Med. 1967;75(47):2371–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies DA, Manstone AJ, Viza DC, Colombani J, Dausset J. Human transplantation antigens: the HL-A (Hu-1) system and its homology with the mouse H-2 system. Transplantation. 1968;6(4):571–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiseman AC. Immunosuppressive Medications. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol CJASN. 2016;11(2):332–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sayegh MH, Turka LA. The role of T-cell costimulatory activation pathways in transplant rejection. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(25):1813–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Halloran PF. Immunosuppressive drugs for kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2715–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nankivell BJ, Alexander SI. Rejection of the kidney allograft. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(15):1451–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(4):252–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Buchbinder EI, Desai A. CTLA-4 and PD-1 Pathways. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016;39(1):98–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Coley WB. The treatment of inoperable sarcoma by bacterial toxins (the mixed toxins of the Streptococcus erysipelas and the Bacillus prodigiosus). Proc R Soc Med. 1910;3(Surg Sect):1–48.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenberg SA, Lotze MT, Muul LM, Leitman S, Chang AE, Ettinghausen SE, et al. Observations on the systemic administration of autologous lymphokine-activated killer cells and recombinant interleukin-2 to patients with metastatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;313(23):1485–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Obara W, Kanehira M, Katagiri T, Kato R, Kato Y, Takata R. Present status and future perspective of peptide-based vaccine therapy for urological cancer. Cancer Sci. 2018;109(3):550–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint blockade. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):158–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(19):1803–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Powles T, Eder JP, Fine GD, Braiteh FS, Loriot Y, Cruz C, et al. MPDL3280A (anti-PD-L1) treatment leads to clinical activity in metastatic bladder cancer. Nature. 2014;515(7528):558–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Limbergen EJ, De Ruysscher DK, Olivo Pimentel V, Marcus D, Berbee M, Hoeben A, et al. Combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy: the past, the present and the future. Br J Radiol. 2017;90(1076):20170157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Rotte A, Bhandaru M, Zhou Y, McElwee KJ. Immunotherapy of melanoma: present options and future promises. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2015;34(1):115–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Calne RY, Collier DS, Lim S, Pollard SG, Samaan A, White DJ, et al. Rapamycin for immunosuppression in organ allografting. Lancet Lond Engl. 1989;2(8656):227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Oudard S, Hutson TE, Porta C, Bracarda S, et al. Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2008;372(9637):449–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hudes G, Carducci M, Tomczak P, Dutcher J, Figlin R, Kapoor A, et al. Temsirolimus, interferon alfa, or both for advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(22):2271–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Acuna SA, Fernandes KA, Daly C, Hicks LK, Sutradhar R, Kim SJ, et al. Cancer mortality among recipients of solid-organ transplantation in Ontario, Canada. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(4):463–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Fraumeni JF, Kasiske BL, Israni AK, Snyder JJ, et al. Spectrum of cancer risk among US solid organ transplant recipients. JAMA. 2011;306(17):1891–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Knoll GA, Kokolo MB, Mallick R, Beck A, Buenaventura CD, Ducharme R, et al. Effect of sirolimus on malignancy and survival after kidney transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. BMJ. 2014;349:g6679.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. He H, Stone JR, Perkins DL. Analysis of robust innate immune response after transplantation in the absence of adaptive immunity. Transplantation. 2002;73(6):853–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Matzinger P. Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12:991–1045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Briscoe DM, Sayegh MH. A rendezvous before rejection: where do T cells meet transplant antigens? Nat Med. 2002;8(3):220–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sayegh MH. Why do we reject a graft? Role of indirect allorecognition in graft rejection. Kidney Int. 1999;56(5):1967–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Matas AJ, Scheinman JI, Rattazzi LC, Mozes MF, Simmons RL, Najarian JS. Immunopathological studies of the ruptured human renal allograft. Transplantation. 1976;22(5):420–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Terasaki PI. Humoral theory of transplantation. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2003;3(6):665–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Solez K, Colvin RB, Racusen LC, Haas M, Sis B, Mengel M, et al. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology: updates and future directions. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2008;8(4):753–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB, Bonsib SM, Castro MC, Cavallo T, et al. The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int. 1999;55(2):713–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Anglicheau D, Loupy A, Lefaucheur C, Pessione F, Létourneau I, Côté I, et al. A simple clinico-histopathological composite scoring system is highly predictive of graft outcomes in marginal donors. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2008;8(11):2325–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hilbrands LB, Wetzels JFM. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(19):2071–4; author reply 2071–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Dunn CJ, Wagstaff AJ, Perry CM, Plosker GL, Goa KL. Cyclosporin: an updated review of the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of a microemulsion-based formulation (neoral)1 in organ transplantation. Drugs. 2001;61(13):1957–2016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Clatworthy MR, Watson CJE, Plotnek G, Bardsley V, Chaudhry AN, Bradley JA, et al. B-cell-depleting induction therapy and acute cellular rejection. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(25):2683–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tydén G, Genberg H, Tollemar J, Ekberg H, Persson NH, Tufveson G, et al. A randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, study of single-dose rituximab as induction in renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2009;87(9):1325–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. van den Hoogen MWF, Kamburova EG, Baas MC, Steenbergen EJ, Florquin S, M Koenen HJP, et al. Rituximab as induction therapy after renal transplantation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2015;15(2):407–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sonnenday CJ, Warren DS, Cooper M, Samaniego M, Haas M, King KE, et al. Plasmapheresis, CMV hyperimmune globulin, and anti-CD20 allow ABO-incompatible renal transplantation without splenectomy. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. 2004;4(8):1315–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Veenstra DL, Best JH, Hornberger J, Sullivan SD, Hricik DE. Incidence and long-term cost of steroid-related side effects after renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl Kidney Found. 1999;33(5):829–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Julian BA, Laskow DA, Dubovsky J, Dubovsky EV, Curtis JJ, Quarles LD. Rapid loss of vertebral mineral density after renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(8):544–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sabatini S, Ferguson RM, Helderman JH, Hull AR, Kirkpatrick BS, Barr WH. Drug substitution in transplantation: a National Kidney Foundation White Paper. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl Kidney Found. 1999;33(2):389–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Neuzillet Y, Karam G, Lechevallier E, Kleinclauss F, Comité Transplantation de l’Association Française d’Urologie. [MTOR inhibitors: from transplantation to oncology. AFU 2006 Transplantation Committee Review of the literature]. Progres En Urol J Assoc Francaise Urol Soc Francaise Urol. 2007;17(5):928–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cai J, Terasaki PI. Induction immunosuppression improves long-term graft and patient outcome in organ transplantation: an analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing registry data. Transplantation. 2010;90(12):1511–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wagner M, Earley AK, Webster AC, Schmid CH, Balk EM, Uhlig K. Mycophenolic acid versus azathioprine as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12:CD007746.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Webster A, Woodroffe RC, Taylor RS, Chapman JR, Craig JC. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;4:CD003961.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Breda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Boissier, R., Territo, A., Breda, A. (2020). Immunology in Tumor and Transplant. In: Chapple, C., Steers, W., Evans, C. (eds) Urologic Principles and Practice. Springer Specialist Surgery Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28599-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28599-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28598-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28599-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics