Skip to main content

Institutional Routines and the Victorian Publishing Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Victorian Literary Businesses
  • 240 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides the literature review, discussing organisational theory in the context of the publishing industry. This creative and cultural industry has been frequently analysed, debated and discussed within the fields of book and publishing history, bibliography, media studies and literary studies; however, there is a gap within studies which uses the theories and methods from academic business research. The chapter begins with a discussion of new institutionalist theory in particular addressing how and why certain practices are championed over others in an organisation, and the affect this has on an industry. The chapter also draws on conversations regarding institutional processes, legitimacy building and institutional entrepreneurship. Furthermore, the chapter discusses professionalisation in the Victorian publishing industry, a mechanism that has been argued within institutional theory as a key factor for the legitimacy of action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abel, Richard L. “The Rise of Professionalism.” British Journal of Law and Society 6, no. 1 (1979): 82–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altick, Richard D. Victorian People and Ideas. New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Bernard. “Some Problems in the Sociology of the Professions.” Daedalus 92, no. 4 (1963): 669–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, Julie. “Agency and Institutions: The Enabling Role of Individuals’ Social Position.” Organization 13, no. 5 (2006): 653–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, Julie, and Thomas D’Aunno. “Institutional Work and the Paradox of Embedded Agency.” In Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations, edited by Thomas B. Lawrence, Roy Suddaby, and Bernard Leca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, Jens. “Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change: The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations.” Organization Studies 20, no. 5 (1999): 777–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brake, Laurel, and Marysa Demoor, eds. Dictionary of Nineteenth-Century Journalism in Great Britain and Ireland. Gent and London: Academia Press and British Library, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, J. B. Writing and Victorianism. London: Longman, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale, Ivano. “Beyond Constraining and Enabling: Toward New Microfoundations for Institutional Theory.” Academy of Management Review 43, no. 1 (2018): 132–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chartier, Roger. “The Practical Impact of Writing.” In The Book History Reader, edited by David Finkelstein and Alistair McCleery. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Giles N., and Angus Phillips. Inside Book Publishing. 5th ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnton, Robert. “What Is the History of Books?” Daedalus 111, no. 3 (1982): 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Cathy N. “Towards a History of Books and Readers.” American Quarterly 40, no. 1 (1988): 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereaux Jennings, P., Michael Lounsbury, and Manely Sharifian. “Entrepreneurial Agency and Institutions.” In The Routledge Companion to Entrepreneurship, edited by Ted Baker and Friederike Welter. Abingdon: Routledge, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (1983): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———, eds. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkerley, David. Occupations and Society. Abingdon: Routledge, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, Simon. Some Patterns and Trends in British Publishing, 1800–1919. London: Bibliographical Society, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, Julia. “Professionalism: Value and Ideology.” Current Sociology Review 61, no. 5–6 (2013): 778–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, John. A History of British Publishing. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, David, and Alistair McCleery. An Introduction to Book History. 2nd ed. London, New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Hilary. “Periodicals and Reviewing.” In The Cambridge History of Victorian Literature, edited by Kate Flint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedson, Eliot. “Theory and the Professions.” Indiana Law Journal 64, no. 3 (1989): 423–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, Mary Ann. The Professional Literary Agent in Britain, 1880–1920. Toronto and London: University of Toronto Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Jan. “Foucault Among the Sociologists: The ‘Disciplines’ and the History of the Professions.” History and Theory 23, no. 2 (1984): 170–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinings, C. R. (Bob), Royston Greenwood, Trish Reay, and Roy Suddaby. “Dynamics of Change in Organizational Fields.” In Handbook of Organizational Change and Innovation, edited by Marshall Scott Poole and Andrew H. Van de Ven. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinks, John. “Introduction.” In Periodicals and Publishers, edited by John Hinks. Newcastle and London: Oak Knoll Press and The British Library, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howsam, Leslie. “20b the History of the Book in Britain, 1801–1914.” In The Oxford Companion to the Book, edited by Michael F. Suarez and H. R. Woudhuysen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. http://www.oxfordreference.com.idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/view/10.1093/acref/9780198606536.001.0001/acref-9780198606536-e-0021.

  • Hughes, Everett C. “The Professions.” Daedalus 92, no. 4 (1963): 655–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. A. “Introduction.” In Professions and Professionalization, edited by J. A. Jackson. [S.l.]: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Alice, and Juliet John. “Introduction.” In Rethinking Victorian Culture, edited by Alice Jenkins and Juliet John. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepperson, Ronald L. “Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutionalism”. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Terence James. Professions and Power. London: Macmillan, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Magali Sarfatti. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, Graham. Serializing Fiction in the Victorian Press. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Thomas B., and Masoud Shadnam. “Institutional Theory.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication, edited by Wolfgang Donsbach. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Thomas B., and Roy Suddaby. “Institutions and Institutional Work.” In Handbook of Organization Studies, edited by S. R. Clegg, C Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, and W. R. Nord. 215–254. London: Sage, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Thomas B., Roy Suddaby, and Bernard Leca. “Institutional Work: Refocusing Institutional Studies of Organization.” Journal of Management Inquiry 20, no. 1 (2011): 52–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leicht, Kevin T., and Mary L. Fennell. “Institutionalism and the Professions.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Kerstin Sahlin, and Roy Suddaby. London: Sage, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Keith M. The Sociology of the Professions. London: Sage, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malatesta, Maria. Professional Men, Professional Women: The European Professions from the 19th Century to Today. London: Sage, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays, Kelly J. “The Publishing World.” In A Companion to the Victorian Novel, edited by Patrick Brantlinger and William B. Thesing. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, D. F. “The Sociology of a Text: Orality, Literacy and Print in Early New Zealand.” In The Book History Reader, edited by David Finkelstein and Alistair McCleery. Abingdon and Oxon: Routledge, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” The American Journal of Sociology 83, no. 2 (1977): 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millerson, Geoffrey. The Qualifying Associations: A Study in Professionalization. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Elizabeth. “Serial Fiction in Australian Colonial Newspapers.” In Literature in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-Century British Publishing & Reading Practices, edited by John O. Jordan and Robert L. Patten. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, David. High Victorian Culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Simone. “Publishing Studies: Critically Mapping Research in Search of a Discipline.” Publishing Research Quarterly 22, no. 4 (2006): 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzio, Daniel, and Ian Kirkpatrick. “Introduction: Professions and Organizations—A Conceptual Framework.” Current Sociology 59, no. 4 (2011): 389–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzio, Daniel, and John Flood. “Entrepreneurship, Managerialism and Professionalism in Action: The Case of the Legal Profession in England and Wales.” In Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Professional Services, edited by Markus Reihlen and Andreas Werr. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzio, Daniel, David M. Brock, and Roy Suddaby. “Professions and Institutional Change: Towards an Institutionalist Sociology of the Professions.” Journal of Management Studies 50, no. 5 (2013): 699–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilsen, Lorri. “Literacy.” In The Oxford Companion to the Book, edited by Michael F. Suarez and H. R. Woudhuysen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. http://www.oxfordreference.com.idpproxy.reading.ac.uk/view/10.1093/acref/9780198606536.001.0001/acref-9780198606536-e-2874.

  • Newman, Rebecca Edwards. “Genre, Criticism, and the Early Victorian Novel.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Victorian Novel, edited by Lisa Rodensky. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Day, Rosemary. The Professions in Early Modern England, 1450–1800. Harlow: Longman, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Professions in Early Modern England, 1450–1800: Servants of the Commonwealth. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Gorman, Francis, ed. The Victorian Novel. Blackwell Guides to Criticism, edited by Michael O’Neill. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Talcott. “The Professions and Social Structure.” Social Forces 17, no. 4 (1939): 457–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W., and Jeanette Anastasia Colyvas. “The New Institutionalism.” In The International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies, edited by Stewart Clegg and James R. Bailey. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, James. “The Book as a Commodity.” In The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain 1695–1830, edited by Michael F. Suarez and H. R. Woudhuysen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Industrial Revolution of the Book.” In The Cambridge Companion to the History of the Book, edited by Leslie Howsam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, Matthew. “Journalism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Culture, edited by Francis O’Gorman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Joan Shelley. “What Is the History of the History of Books?” Journal of American History 90, no. 2 (2003): 555–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saks, Mike. “Inequalities, Marginality and the Professions.” Current Sociology 63, no. 6 (2015): 850–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Richard. The Formation of the Victorian Literary Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. Richard. “Lords of the Dance: Professionals as Institutional Agents.” Organization Studies 29, no. 2 (2008): 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seville, Catherine. Literary Copyright Reform in Early Victorian England: The Framing of the 1842 Copyright Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, Joanne. “Introduction.” In The Cambridge Companion to English Literature 1830–1914, edited by Joanne Shattock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, Claire. Marketing Literature: The Making of Contemporary Writing in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, John. “Satirical Print Culture.” In The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Culture, edited by Francis O’Gorman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, Michael Felix. “Historiographical Problems and Possibilities in Book History and National Histories of the Book.” Studies in Bibliography 56 (2003): 140–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, Roy. “Challenges for Institutional Theory.” Journal of Management Inquiry 19, no. 1 (2010): 14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, John. “The Victorian Novelists: Who Were They? In The Book History Reader, edited by David Finklestein and Alistair McCleery. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Nicola Diane. Victorian Women Writers and the Woman Question. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, James. “Periodicals and Periodicity.” In A Companion to the History of the Book, edited by Simon Eliot and Jonathan Rose. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, Alexandra, and Martin Willis. “Introduction: Defining Victorian.” In The Victorian Literature Handbook, edited by Alexandra Warwick and Martin Willis. London, New York: Continuum, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weedon, Alexis. Victorian Publishing: The Economics of Book Production for a Mass Market, 1836–1916. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Joseph, M. (2019). Institutional Routines and the Victorian Publishing Industry. In: Victorian Literary Businesses. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28592-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics