Skip to main content

Experiencer, Theme, Goal, and Patient

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Thematic Relations
  • 196 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter some additional problems about the role Patient are discussed, in particular its delimitation with respect to other traditionally defined roles. It is shown that the Experiencer must be kept distinct from the Patient and that in many cases the elaborate thematic relation “goal” can be derived from the role Patient by elaboration. Some derivations of actual sentences are given, showing how elaborate relations arise from semantic roles: for instance, how the elaborate relation “theme” can, in some cases, be an elaboration of the role Patient. The action of cognitive filters at the elaborate level of ETRs (elaborate thematic relations) is discussed and shown to be necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Schlesinger (1992) proposed that the Experiencer be analyzed as an Agent, which is untenable on both syntactic and semantic grounds.

  2. 2.

    Let us remember that in [5] the role Patient must be explicitly marked, in order to block the prototype rule.

  3. 3.

    This may sound a bit arbitrary at first, but it is the way the language chose to delimit the role Patient; and who are we to question the language’s decisions?

  4. 4.

    Márcia Cançado, p.c.

  5. 5.

    In writing, and for many speakers in speech as well, the reflexive, here se, is required.

  6. 6.

    For me at least um navio abastece em algumas horas “a ship is provisioned [lit.: provisions] in a few hours” sounds pretty good.

  7. 7.

    There may be semantic factors involved; for instance, unlike encher “fill,” matar “kill” is something that does not occur spontaneously; and there are indications that the ergative always expresses a spontaneous event.

  8. 8.

    Loredo Neta (2014) has found that “goal” complements tend to resist omission; this may be an explanation for this case, but I prefer to leave it open for the moment.

References

  • Loredo Neta, M. (2014). Objeto direto: condições de omissão no português do Brasil [Direct object: conditions of omission in Brazilian Portuguese]. Belo Horizonte: Doctoral Thesis, UFMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, I. M. (1992). The experiencer as an agent. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Perini, M.A. (2019). Experiencer, Theme, Goal, and Patient. In: Thematic Relations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28538-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics