Advertisement

Journeys in Mathematical Landscapes: Genius or Craft?

  • Lorenzo Lane
  • Ursula MartinEmail author
  • Dave Murray-Rust
  • Alison Pease
  • Fenner Tanswell
Chapter
  • 102 Downloads
Part of the Mathematics Education in the Digital Era book series (MEDE, volume 14)

Abstract

We look at how Anglophone mathematicians have, over the last hundred years or so, presented their activities using metaphors of landscape and journey. We contrast romanticised self-presentations of the isolated genius with ethnographic studies of mathematicians at work, both alone, and in collaboration, looking particularly at on-line collaborations in the “polymath” format. The latter provide more realistic evidence of mathematicians daily practice, consistent with the “growth mindset” notion of mathematical educators, that mathematical abilities are skills to be developed, rather than fixed traits. We place our observations in a broader literature on landscape, social space, craft and wayfaring, which combine in the notion of the production of mathematics as crafting the exploration of an unknown landscape. We indicate how “polymath” has a two-fold educational role, enabling participants to develop their skills, and providing a public demonstration of the craft of mathematics in action.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dave de Roure and Pip Willcocks for helpful discussions, and the referees for their thoughtful comments. Support from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council is acknowledged under grants EPSRC EP/K040251/2 (Martin, Lane, Tanswell), EP/J017728/2 (Murray-Rust) and EP/P017320/1 (Pease).

References

  1. Barany, M, & Mackenzie, D. (2014). Chalk: Materials and concepts in mathematics research. In Representation in scientific practice revisited (pp. 107–130). MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. San Francisco, CA: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste, tr. Richard Nice. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14, 723–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bundy, A. (1988). The use of explicit plans to guide inductive proofs. In International Conference on Automated Deduction.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, P. J. & Hersh, R. (1995). The mathematical experience (study ed.). Birkhauser.Google Scholar
  7. De Morgan, A. (1842). The differential and integral calculus (p. vii). Baldwin and Cradock.Google Scholar
  8. du Sautoy, M. (2015). How mathematicians are storytellers and numbers are the characters. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/books/2015/jan/23/mathematicians-storytellers-numbers-characters-marcus-du-sautoy.
  9. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House Incorporated.Google Scholar
  10. Ehrhardt, C. (2010). A social history of the “Galois Affair” at the Paris academy of sciences. Science in Context, 23(1), 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gowers, T. (2000). The two cultures of mathematics. In V.I. Arnold (Ed.), Mathematics: Frontiers and perspectives. AMS. https://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~wtg10/2cultures.pdf.
  12. Gowers, T. (2009). https://www.gowers.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/ismassively-collaborative-mathematicspossible/. Gowers, T., & Nielsen, M. (2009). Massively collaborative mathematics. Nature, 461, 879–881.
  13. Hardy, G. H. (1929). Mathematical proof. Mind.Google Scholar
  14. Harris, M. (2015). Mathematics without apologies. Princeton.Google Scholar
  15. Heidigger, M. (1962). Being and time, tr J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  16. Hollings, C., Martin, U., & Rice, A. (2017). The Lovelace–De Morgan mathematical correspondence: A critical re-appraisal. Historia Mathematica, 44(3), 202–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 152–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  19. Jenkins, A. (2007). Space and the ‘March of Mind’: Literature and the physical sciences in Britain 1815–1850. OUP.Google Scholar
  20. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lane, L. (2017). The bridge between worlds: Relating position and Ddsposition in the mathematical field, Ph.D. thesis, University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  22. Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mackenzie, D. (2003). An equation and its worlds: Bricolage, exemplars, disunity and performativity in financial economics. Social Studies of Science, 33, 831–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin, U. (2015). Stumbling around in the dark: Lessons from everyday mathematics. In A. P. Felty & A. Middeldorp (Eds.), Proceedings of CADE-25. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 9195). Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Mason J., & Hanna, G. (2016). Values in caring for proof. In B. Larvor (Ed.), Mathematical cultures. Springer Trends in the History of Science.Google Scholar
  26. Murray-Rust, D., et al. (2015). On wayfaring in social machines. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on the World Wide Web (pp. 1143–1148).Google Scholar
  27. Neale, V. (2017). Closing the gap, the quest to understand prime numbers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Polymath, D. H. J. (2014). The ‘bounded gaps between primes’ polymath project: A retrospective analysis. Newsletter of the European Mathematical Society, 94, 13–23.Google Scholar
  30. Pye, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Roberts, S. (2015). John Horton Conway, the world’s most charismatic mathematician. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/science/2015/jul/23/john-horton-conway-the-most-charismatic-mathematician-in-the-world.
  32. Robinson, A. (2011). Genius, a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ryle, G. (1971). Thinking and self-teaching. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 5, 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simon, S. (2009). Newton on the beach: The information order of Principia Mathematica. History of Science, xlvi. Science History Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  35. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tanswell, F. (2017). Proof, rigour and informality: A virtue account of mathematical knowledge. Ph.D. thesis, University of St Andrews.Google Scholar
  37. Tao, T. (2007). Does one have to be a genius to do maths? terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/does-one-have-to-be-a-genius-to-do-maths/.
  38. Tao, T. (2017). Blog comment on “The ABC conjecture has (still) not been proved”. galoisrepresentations.wordpress.com/2017/12/17/the-abc-conjecture-has-still-not-been-proved/#comment-4563.
  39. Thomas, R. (2016). Beauty is not all there is to aesthetics in mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica, 25, 116–127.Google Scholar
  40. Turnor, E., Collections for the history of the town and soke of Grantham (London, 1806, Vol. 173, No. 2), where it is claimed this was said by Newton “a little before his death”.Google Scholar
  41. Villani, C. (2015). Birth of a theorem: A mathematical adventure. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  42. Wiles, A. (2000). Transcription of interview by PBS. www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/andrew-wiles-fermat.html.
  43. Zeitz, P. (2006). The art and craft of problem solving. Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorenzo Lane
    • 1
  • Ursula Martin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dave Murray-Rust
    • 2
  • Alison Pease
    • 3
  • Fenner Tanswell
    • 4
  1. 1.University of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.University of EdinburghEdinburghScotland
  3. 3.University of DundeeDundeeScotland
  4. 4.University of St AndrewsSt AndrewsScotland

Personalised recommendations