Abstract
A course developed by Robert Y. Lewis, Floris van Doorn, and the author serves as an undergraduate introduction to mathematical proof, symbolic logic, and interactive theorem proving. The treatment of each topic on its own is routine, and the novelty lies in the way they are combined to form a multifaceted introduction to mathematical reasoning and argumentation. Students are required to master three different languages: informal mathematical language, formal symbolic logic, and a computational proof language that lies somewhere in between. Experience teaching the course suggests that students have no trouble keeping the languages distinct while at the same appreciating the relationships between them, and that the multiple representations support one another and provide a robust understanding of mathematical proof.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Logic-based software is also often used to teach other topics in logic and computer science. The web page https://avigad.github.io/formal_methods_in_education/ provides links to some resources.
References
Avigad, J., Lewis, R. Y., & van Doorn, F. (2019). Logic and Proof. http://leanprover.github.io/logic_and_proof/.
Barwise, J., & Etchemendy, J. (1994). Hyperproof. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Carter, N. C., & Monks, K. G. (2016). From formal to expository: using the proof-checking word processor Lurch to teach proof writing. In Schwell, Steurer & Vasquez (Eds.), Beyond lecture: Techniques to improve student proof-writing across the curriculum. MAA Press. http://lurchmath.org/.
de Moura, L., Kong, S., Avigad, J., van Doorn, F., & von Raumer, J. (2015) The Lean theorem prover. In A. P. Felty & A. Middeldorp (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Automated Deduction (CADE-25) (pp. 378–388). Berlin: Springer. https://leanprover.github.io/.
Inglis, M., & Attridge, N. (2017). Does mathematical study develop logical thinking. Testing the Theory of Formal Discipline. London: World Scientific.
Sieg, W. (2007). AProS project: Strategic thinking and computational logic. Logic Journal of the IGPL15(4), 359–368. http://www.phil.cmu.edu/projects/apros.
Velleman, D. (2006) How to prove it: A structured approach (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://app.cs.amherst.edu/~djvelleman/pd/pd.html.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Mateja Jamnik and Keith Jones for helpful comments, corrections, and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Avigad, J. (2019). Learning Logic and Proof with an Interactive Theorem Prover. In: Hanna, G., Reid, D., de Villiers, M. (eds) Proof Technology in Mathematics Research and Teaching . Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28483-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28483-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28482-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28483-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)