Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 121 Accesses

Abstract

The man is proposing to the woman and her response, maybe, has more than one potential meaning (Verschueren in Understanding Pragmatics. Oxford University Press, New York, 1999). The most likely meaning is that she is uncertain about whether to marry this man; another interpretation could be that she is playing hard to get. Maybe is a type of language which is termed ‘elastic language’ (EL) ( Zhang in Elastic language: How and why we stretch our words. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015). EL refers to utterances with fluidity, where language interpretations overlap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Channell, J. (1994). Vague language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W. Z., & Wu, S. X. (2002). Fanchou yu Mohu Yuyi Yanjiu (in Chinese) [A study on category and semantic fuzziness]. Fujian, China: Fujian People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W. (2007). The use of vague language across spoken genres in an intercultural Hong Kong corpus. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 161–181). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, J. (2007). ‘I think he was kind of shouting or something’: Uses and abuses of vagueness in the British courtroom. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 97–114). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, J. (Ed.). (2007). Vague language explored. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 227–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glinert, L. (2010). Apologizing to China: Elastic apologies and the meta-discourse of American diplomats. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(1), 47–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics. Volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W., & Schneider, S. (Eds.). (2010). New approaches to hedging. Bingley, UK: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munné, F. (2013). The fuzzy complexity of language. In A. Massip-Bonet & A. Bastardas-Boada (Eds.), Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society (pp. 175–196). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parvaresh, V. (2018). ‘We are going to do a lot of things for college tuition’: Vague language in the 2016 US presidential debates. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(2), 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. (1985). Purposive vagueness: An evaluative dimension of vague quantifying expressions. Journal of Linguistics, 21, 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, E. F., Frader, J., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In R. J. Di Pietro (Ed.), Linguistics and the professions (pp. 83–97). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzaitė, J. (2007). Vague language in educational settings: Quantifiers and approximators in British and American English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabet, P., & Zhang, G. (2015). Communicating through vague language: A comparative study of L1 and L2 speakers. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trappes-Lomax, H. (2007). Vague language as a means of self-protective avoidance: Tension management in conference talks. In J. Cutting (Ed.), Vague language explored (pp. 117–137). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Deemter, K. (2012). Not exactly: In praise of vagueness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of interaction (2nd ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyte.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. P. (1999). Mohu Yuyanxue (in Chinese) [Fuzzy linguistics]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. (2011). Elasticity of vague language. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8, 571–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, G. (2015). Elastic language: How and why we stretch our words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grace Zhang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhang, G., Parvaresh, V. (2019). Introduction. In: Elastic Language in Persuasion and Comforting. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28460-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics