Skip to main content

The Extended Authentication Process in the Environment of the Laboratory Information and Management System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Collective Intelligence (ICCCI 2019)

Abstract

Laboratory information systems have evolved from applications designed to simplify or eliminate routine processes. Their further development follows the trend of interconnection with intelligent laboratory equipment. Laboratories of primary research are specific in many ways and commonly available information systems cannot be deployed there. Development of a new lab information and management system should be designed in order to ensure not only safe and secured operation but also modular requirements. Elements of data security can be successfully implemented on the basis of studies and standards which deal with this issue on a general level. The area of security should be viewed in the context of the lab as the whole. The mentioned type of laboratories processes a sensitive material, creates compounds of nonresearched properties, which are studied and results are subsequently published. It is obvious that the environment has to be secured at all levels. The following article describes a possible solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jiang, Q., Khan, M.K., Lu, X., Ma, J., He, D.: A privacy preserving three-factor authentication protocol for e-Health clouds. J. Supercomput. 72(10), 3826–3849 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-015-1610-x. ISSN 0920-8542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kammergruber, R., Robold, S., Karliҫ, J., Durner, J.: The future of the laboratory information system – what are the requirements for a powerful system for a laboratory data management?. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. (CCLM) 52(11) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-0276

  3. ISO/IEC 17025 - General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories

    Google Scholar 

  4. ISO 9001 “Quality management”

    Google Scholar 

  5. Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, Second Session, Thirty-six Parliament, 48–49 Elizabeth II, 1999–2000, Statutes of Canada (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Law on the Protection of Personal Information, promulgated by the Diet of Japan on May 30 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. TSO (THE STATIONARY OFFICE): ITIL foundation handbook. 3rd ed. TSO, London (2012). ISBN: 978-0-11-331349-5

    Google Scholar 

  8. GAMP 5: A Risk-based Approach to Compliant GxP Computerized Systems. ISPE Headquarters, Tampa (2008). ISBN 1-931879-77-X

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prasad, P.J., Bodhe, G.L.: Trends in laboratory information management system. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 118, 187–192 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Quo, C.F., Wu, B., Wang, M.D.: Development of a laboratory information system for cancer collaboration projects. In: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2005.1617070

  11. Ekins, S.: Computer Applications in Pharmaceutical Research and Development, pp. 57–61. Wiley, Hoboken (2006). ISBN 0-471-73779-8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hu, Y.: Development of information management system used in laboratory advanced materials research. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, IEEE-EMBS 2005, 27th Annual International Conference, Shanghai, pp. 2859–2862. IEEE (2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.605-607.2518. ISBN: 0-7803-8741-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haas, S., Wohlgemuth, S., Echizen, I., Sonehara, N., Müller, G.: Aspects of privacy for electronic health records. Int. J. Med. Inf. 80(2) (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blazek, P., Kuca, K., Jun, D., Krejcar, O.: Development of information and management system for laboratory based on open source licensed software. In: Núñez, M., Nguyen, N.T., Camacho, D., Trawiński, B. (eds.) ICCCI 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9330, pp. 377–387. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24306-1_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Blazek, P., Kuca, K., Jun, D., Krejcar, O.: Development of information and management system for laboratory based on open source licensed software with security logs extension. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 32(2), 1497–1508 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-169145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Blazek, P., Kuca, K., Krenek, J., Krejcar, O.: Increasing of data security and workflow optimization in information and management system for laboratory. In: Rojas, I., Ortuño, F. (eds.) IWBBIO 2017. LNCS, vol. 10208, pp. 602–613. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56148-6_54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Blazek, P., Kuca, K., Krejcar, O.: Concept of a module for physical security of material secured by LIMS. In: Rojas, I., Ortuño, F. (eds.) IWBBIO 2018. LNCS, vol. 10813, pp. 352–363. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78723-7_30. ISBN 978-3-319-78722-0

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Mamonov, S., Benbunan-fich, R.: The impact of information security threat awareness on privacy-protective behaviors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 83, 32–44 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.028. ISSN 07475632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rudolph, M., Feth, D., Polst, S.: Why users ignore privacy policies – a survey and intention model for explaining user privacy behavior. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCI 2018. LNCS, vol. 10901, pp. 587–598. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91238-7_45. ISBN 978-3-319-91237-0

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Liang, K., et al.: A secure and efficient ciphertext-policy attribute-based proxy re-encryption for cloud data sharing. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 52, 95–108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2014.11.016. ISSN 0167739X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rao, Y.S.: Privacy-preserving decentralized key-policy attribute-based encryption schemes with fast decryption. In: Jajodia, S., Mazumdar, C. (eds.) ICISS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9478, pp. 521–531. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26961-0_31. ISBN 978-3-319-26960-3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Rasmussen, L., Maddox, C., Harten, B., White, E.: A successful LIMS implementation: case study at southern research institute. J. Assoc. Lab. Autom. 12(6), 384–390 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jala.2007.08.002. ISSN 15355535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pavlik, J., Komarek, A., Sobeslav, V.: Security information and event management in the cloud computing infrastructure. Comput. Intell. Inf. 209–214 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/cinti.2014.7028677

  24. Hub, M., Capek, J., Myskova, R., Roudny, R.: Usability versus security of authentication. In: International Conference on Communication and Management in Technological Innovation and Academic Globalization-Proceedings, Puerto De La Cruz, Spain, pp. 34–38 (2010). ISBN 978-960-474-254-7

    Google Scholar 

  25. Brumen, B., Taneski, V.: Moore’s curse on textual passwords. In: 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) IEEE, pp. 1360–1365 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/mipro.2015.7160486. ISBN 978-9-5323-3082-3

  26. Hoober, S.: Design for Fingers and Thumbs Instead of Touch. UXmatters. Accessed 24 Aug 2017

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jain, A.K., Ross, A., Prabhakar, S.: An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 14(1), 4–20 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/tcsvt.2003.818349. ISSN 1051-8215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. The Role of Biometrics in Enterprise Security. http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/power/ps1q06-20050132-Tilton-OE.pdf. Accessed 5 Feb 2018

  29. Potter, R., Weldon, L., Shneiderman, B.: Improving the accuracy of touch screens: an experimental evaluation of three strategies. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 1988, Washington, DC, pp. 27–32 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1145/57167.57171

  30. Liu, T., Wang, Y.: Beyond scale: an efficient framework for evaluating web access control policies in the era of big data. In: Tanaka, K., Suga, Y. (eds.) IWSEC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9241, pp. 316–334. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22425-1_19. ISBN 978-3-319-22424-4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Al-Saggaf, A.A.: Key binding biometrics-based remote user authentication scheme using smart cards. IET Biometrics 7(3), 278–284 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-bmt.2016.0146. ISSN 2047-4938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Announcing Approval of Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 202, SHA-3 Standard: Permutation-Based Hash and Extendable-Output Functions, and Revision of the Applicability Clause of FIPS 180-4, Secure Hash Standard

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research has been partially supported by the Faculty of Informatics and Management UHK specific research project 2107 Computer Networks for Cloud, Distributed Computing, and Internet of Things II. Thanks goes also to Mr. Martin Kulhanek, a diploma student, for some help in the paper preparation phase.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Blazek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Blazek, P., Krejcar, O. (2019). The Extended Authentication Process in the Environment of the Laboratory Information and Management System. In: Nguyen, N., Chbeir, R., Exposito, E., Aniorté, P., Trawiński, B. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28374-2_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28374-2_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28373-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28374-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics