Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transvaginal Urethrolysis for Urethral Obstruction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Female Pelvic Surgery

  • 812 Accesses

Abstract

Urethral or bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) following anti-incontinence procedures is an infrequent but significant complication affecting women with stress urinary incontinence, with an incidence ranging between 2% and 8% in the literature.

Symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction following these procedures may present as urinary retention, incomplete emptying, or weakened stream in the more immediate postoperative period; however, a significant number of women with BOO experience more subtle symptoms of de novo urgency and irritative symptoms, and thus may have delayed presentation and diagnosis. There are several proposed definitions and criteria for diagnosing BOO based on urodynamics; however, ultimately there are no standardized definitions, and patients with true BOO may be missed with these definitions.

The treatment for female BOO with mid-urethral synthetic or autologous slings is often sling incision or excision. For more complex repairs, suspension procedures, or failed sling incisions, a more formalized urethrolysis is typically required. With advanced technologies, surgeons have now incorporated both laparoscopic and robotic techniques in performing urethrolysis, in addition to the traditional transvaginal approaches.

The timing of urethrolysis from initial anti-incontinence procedure has been examined in several studies, and although the issue remains debated, there is an increasing trend to perform sling incision or urethrolysis earlier due to concerns for persistent lower urinary tract symptoms despite correction of the bladder outlet obstruction. The most common complication from sling incision or urethrolysis is recurrent stress urinary incontinence; this must be balanced with concerns over delayed intervention.

Further study is necessary for delineating long-term validated patient-reported outcomes and examining comparative effectiveness of the various repair techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Groutz A, Blaivas JG. Non-neurogenic female voiding dysfunction. Curr Opin Urol. 2002;12(4):311–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gomelsky A, Nitti VW, Dmochowski RR. Management of obstructive voiding dysfunction after incontinence surgery: lessons learned. Urology. 2003;62(3):391–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tran H, Rutman M. Female outlet obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery. Urology. 2018;112:1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jonsson Funk M, Levin PJ, Wu JM. Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(4):845–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman HB. Urethrolysis. Urol Clin North Am. 2011;38(1):31–7, vi

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dmochowski RR, et al. Update of AUA guideline on the surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2010;183(5):1906–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aponte MM, et al. Urodynamics for clinically suspected obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery in women. J Urol. 2013;190(2):598–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carr LK, Webster GD. Voiding dysfunction following incontinence surgery: diagnosis and treatment with retropubic or vaginal urethrolysis. J Urol. 1997;157(3):821–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chassagne S, et al. Proposed cutoff values to define bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urology. 1998;51(3):408–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Defreitas GA, et al. Refining diagnosis of anatomic female bladder outlet obstruction: comparison of pressure-flow study parameters in clinically obstructed women with those of normal controls. Urology. 2004;64(4):675–9; discussion 679–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nitti VW, Tu LM, Gitlin J. Diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. J Urol. 1999;161(5):1535–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cormier L, et al. Diagnosis of female bladder outlet obstruction and relevance of the parameter area under the curve of detrusor pressure during voiding: preliminary results. J Urol. 2002;167(5):2083–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blaivas JG, Groutz A. Bladder outlet obstruction nomogram for women with lower urinary tract symptomatology. Neurourol Urodyn. 2000;19(5):553–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Massolt ET, Groen J, Vierhout ME. Application of the Blaivas-Groutz bladder outlet obstruction nomogram in women with urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24(3):237–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Akikwala TV, Fleischman N, Nitti VW. Comparison of diagnostic criteria for female bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol. 2006;176(5):2093–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. South MM, et al. Early vs late midline sling lysis results in greater improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(5):564.e1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leng WW, et al. Delayed treatment of bladder outlet obstruction after sling surgery: association with irreversible bladder dysfunction. J Urol. 2004;172(4 Pt 1):1379–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Starkman JS, et al. The evolution of obstruction induced overactive bladder symptoms following urethrolysis for female bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol. 2008;179(3):1018–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thiel DD, et al. Long-term urinary continence rates after simple sling incision for relief of urinary retention following fascia lata pubovaginal slings. J Urol. 2005;174(5):1878–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Webster GD, Kreder KJ. Voiding dysfunction following cystourethropexy: its evaluation and management. J Urol. 1990;144(3):670–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zimmern PE, et al. Female urethral obstruction after Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz operation. J Urol. 1987;138(3):517–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Carey JM, Chon JK, Leach GE. Urethrolysis with Martius labial fat pad graft for iatrogenic bladder outlet obstruction. Urology. 2003;61(4 Suppl 1):21–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Petrou SP, Brown JA, Blaivas JG. Suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis. J Urol. 1999;161(4):1268–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oliver JL, Raz S. Suprameatal urethrolysis with Martius flap for refractory bladder outflow obstruction following stress incontinence surgery in females. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(1):449–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carmignani G, Simonato A, Traverso P. Transvestibular urethrolysis. Actas Urol Esp. 2012;36(6):379–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ismail SI. Laparoscopic urethrolysis followed by trans-obturator tape sling insertion for long standing voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(4):563–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Orasanu B, et al. Robotic-assisted urethrolysis for urethral obstruction after retropubic bladder neck suspension-a case series report. J Endourol. 2014;28(2):214–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Goldman HB. Simple sling incision for the treatment of iatrogenic urethral obstruction. Urology. 2003;62(4):714–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nitti VW, et al. Early results of pubovaginal sling lysis by midline sling incision. Urology. 2002;59(1):47–51; discussion 51–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Amundsen CL, Guralnick ML, Webster GD. Variations in strategy for the treatment of urethral obstruction after a pubovaginal sling procedure. J Urol. 2000;164(2):434–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Petrou SP, Young PR. Rate of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after retropubic urethrolysis. J Urol. 2002;167(2 Pt 1):613–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Basu M, Duckett JR, Papanikolaou N. Retropubic urethrolysis of colposuspension: does it improve voiding and overactive bladder symptoms? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28(8):783–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Anger JT, Amundsen CL, Webster GD. Obstruction after Burch colposuspension: a return to retropubic urethrolysis. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(5):455–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cross CA, et al. Transvaginal urethrolysis for urethral obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery. J Urol. 1998;159(4):1199–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Goldman HB, Rackley RR, Appell RA. The efficacy of urethrolysis without re-suspension for iatrogenic urethral obstruction. J Urol. 1999;161(1):196–8; discussion 198–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Scarpero HM, Dmochowski RR, Nitti VW. Repeat urethrolysis after failed urethrolysis for iatrogenic obstruction. J Urol. 2003;169(3):1013–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Clifton MM, et al. Risk of repeat anti-incontinence surgery following sling release: a review of 93 cases. J Urol. 2014;191(3):710–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Agnew G, et al. Functional outcomes for surgical revision of synthetic slings performed for voiding dysfunction: a retrospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;163(1):113–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shaw J, Wohlrab K, Rardin C. Recurrence of stress urinary incontinence after midurethral sling revision: a retrospective cohort study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23(3):184–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Aberger M, Gomelsky A, Padmanabhan P. Comparison of retropubic synthetic mid-urethral slings to fascia pubovaginal slings following failed sling surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(7):851–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Parker WP, Gomelsky A, Padmanabhan P. Autologous fascia pubovaginal slings after prior synthetic anti-incontinence procedures for recurrent incontinence: a multi-institutional prospective comparative analysis to de novo autologous slings assessing objective and subjective cure. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(5):604–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Crescenze IM, et al. Urgency incontinence before and after revision of a synthetic mid urethral sling. J Urol. 2016;196(2):478–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC. Pubovaginal fascial sling for the treatment of all types of stress urinary incontinence: surgical technique and long-term outcome. Urol Clin North Am. 2011;38:7–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Smith Institute for Urology, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA

    Kevin Cwach & Justin S. Han

Authors
  1. Kevin Cwach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Justin S. Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin S. Han .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. System Director FPMRS, Associate Professor of Urology, The Smith Institute for Urology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Lake Success, NY, USA

    Farzeen Firoozi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cwach, K., Han, J.S. (2020). Transvaginal Urethrolysis for Urethral Obstruction. In: Firoozi, F. (eds) Female Pelvic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28319-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28319-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28318-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28319-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation