Skip to main content

African Legal Traditions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comparative Law and Legal Traditions
  • 1102 Accesses

Abstract

One fundamental question about African law relates to its place among the legal systems of the world. Although this expression has always been used as a popular descriptor encompassing all African legal systems, the question whether it exists per se has always been controversial among comparative law scholars. Consequently, the answers to this question have varied over time depending on legal, temporal and historical contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sharkey (2013), pp. 153–154. For a critical evaluation of French colonial policy see Sir Harris (1912), p. 97.

  2. 2.

    Mann (2009), p. 336.

  3. 3.

    Grant (2006), p. 13. See Himonga and Nhapo (2014), pp. 9–13.

  4. 4.

    See Frederick (1922), pp. 192–213. And see Mann and Roberts (1991), p. 20.

  5. 5.

    Leman (2009), p. 109.

  6. 6.

    Ubink (2010), p. 96. On native assessors see, among others, s 48 Indian Evidence Act, 1872; s 19 Supreme Court Ordinance 1876 (Ghana); s 8 Swaziland High Court Proclamation 1938; and s 222 Criminal Procedure Act of Northern Rhodesia 1939.

  7. 7.

    See, among others, s 12(1) (a) Local Courts Act 1966, Act No. 20 of 1966 (Zambia).

  8. 8.

    Roberts (1979), Vanderlinden (1996), Eberhard and Vernicos (2006).

  9. 9.

    See the articles published in the Journal ofAfrican Law (1991) 35 (1/2) issue on “Recent Constitutional Developments in Africa”; consider also Richard (1997), p. 363.

  10. 10.

    See, among others, Kischel (2019), Ajani et al. (2018), Rambaud (2017), David et al. (2016); Sacco (2012), p. 313 et seq.; Gambaro and Sacco (2009), Bennett (2019), p. 652; Menski (2006), Ntampaka (2005). As for monographs see Vanderinden (1983), Sacco (2006).

  11. 11.

    See Bamodu (1994), p. 127; Zimmermann and Visser (1996), pp. 7–8. On African mixed jurisdictions see Palmer (2012), p. 625; du Plessis (2019), p. 474.

  12. 12.

    Glenn (2014), p. 60. However, Zweigert and Kötz (1996) and Valcke (2018) completely omit references to African law.

  13. 13.

    See M’Baye (1976), p. 138; Allott (1968), p. 131 et seq.; Sacco (2012), p. 313 ss.; Fombad (2013), p. 48. On such inaccuracy see Vanderlinden (2006), p. 1187.

  14. 14.

    Allott (1967), p. 55; Mar (1960), p. 447; Eisenstadt (1965), p. 453.

  15. 15.

    Ranger (1983), pp. 211, 212.

  16. 16.

    Prinsloo (1987), p. 411. For codification, see, among others, the Civil Code of Ethiopia (1960) and the 1964 Land Tenure Law (Loi sur le Domain National) (Senegal).

  17. 17.

    Sippel (1998), p. 378.

  18. 18.

    Merryman (1977), p. 457.

  19. 19.

    See Mancuso (2007), p. 165; Shumba (2015), p. 127.

  20. 20.

    Oba (2010), p. 79.

  21. 21.

    See Klerman and Mahoney (2007), p. 278; Siems (2016), p. 579; Grosswald Curran (2009), p. 863; Oto-Peralía and Romero-Ávila (2017), p. 121.

  22. 22.

    Bennett (2011), p. 710.

  23. 23.

    See, among others, Seidman (1979), p. 17; Sacco (2012), p. 314; Oba (2010), p. 58.

  24. 24.

    See Art 194 of OHADA Uniform Act on Contract Law and Arts 238–239 of OHADA Uniform Act on General Commercial Law.

  25. 25.

    “Screened by a tropical forest from the north and facing the Gulf of Guinea, the region remained isolated from external influences […] creating specific systems of state law”: Sinitsina (1994), p. 264.

  26. 26.

    Elias (1955), pp. 228–238; Sacco (2012), p. 315.

  27. 27.

    The role of individuals depends on their position in the group to which they belong: Rambaud (2017), p. 258; David et al. (2016), p. 483.

  28. 28.

    Woodman (2010), p. 9.

  29. 29.

    Joireman (2010), p. 298.

  30. 30.

    ss 255(1) and 167(1) of the 1992 Constitution (Ghana); Loi no 034-2009/AN du 16 juin 2009 portant régime foncier rural (Burkina Faso); URT, Land Act (No. 4), sec. 7 and URT, Village Land Act (No. 5), sec. 8(1), 12(1) (Tanzania). For more on the three land classes in Tanzania (‘General Land’, ‘Reserved Land’ and ‘Village Land’) see Martina Locher (2016), pp. 395–396. On the supernatural see Hamer (1998), p. 311.

  31. 31.

    Blanc-Jouvan (1964), p. 7; Molte (1967), p. 123.

  32. 32.

    Ndulo (2011), p. 89.

  33. 33.

    See s 34 Marriage Act 1963 (Zambia); s 1(2) Marriages Act 1964 (Eswatini). For example, Nigeria legislation does not set any age for such solemnisation: see the Marriage Act 1990 (Nigeria). Namibia, South Africa, Togo, Rwanda and Niger and few other coutries explitictly recognise customary marriages. See, among others, s 4(3)(b) Constitution of Namibia; Recognition of Customary Marriages Act, 1998 (Act No. 120 of 1998) (South Africa).

  34. 34.

    See, respectively, Dagbanja (2015), p. 412; Mancuso (2007), p. 174.

  35. 35.

    Fletcher (1998), p. 684. See also Muir Watt (2012), p. 270.

  36. 36.

    Hulme (1995), p. 120.

  37. 37.

    Rambaud (2017), pp. 257–258; David et al. (2016), p. 483 et seq.; Sacco (2009), Vanderlinden (2000), p. 279.

  38. 38.

    On Islamic law as variety of customary law see Anderson (1962), p. 617.

  39. 39.

    See De Grondwet 1854 (Orange Free State); Royal Charter of Natal 1856 (Natal); De Grondwet Der Zuid-afrikaansche Republiek, alson known as The Thirty-Three Articles (Drie en Dertig Artikelen) of 1844–1849 (Transvaal). On Cape colonial law as the common law of Soutern African protectorates territories see: Order in Council 3 November 1871 and s 2 General Law Proclamation 2B of 1884 (Basutoland-Lesotho); Order in Council 9 May 1891, Proclamation 10 June 1891 and General Law Proclamation 1909 (Bechuanaland-Botswana); Order in Council 20 October 1898 (Southern Rhodesia-Zimbabwe); General Administration Act No. 11 of 1905 and General Law and Administration Proclamation No. 4 of 1907 (Swaziland-Eswatini); Proclamation No 21 of 1919 which granted the Roman-Dutch law “as existing and applied in the Province of the Cape of Good Hope” to South-West Africa-Namibia.

  40. 40.

    See, among others, Juma (2011), p. 92.

  41. 41.

    The first code was promulgated by Queen Ranavalona in 1828; Queen Radama II enacted a second code in 1862. Queen Rasoherina promulgated two codes in 1863; Queen Ranavalona II issued a Malagasy-law criminal code in 1869. Two more codes where enacted in 1868 and 1881.

  42. 42.

    See, inter alia, Art. 162 of the 2018 Chad Constitution; Art. 211 of the 1996 South African Constitution; Art. 11(3) 1992 Ghana Constitution (customary law comprises “rules of law which by custom are applicable to particular communities in Ghana”); s 68 Courts (Amendment) Act 1967 (Malawi) (conflict of law rule for determining the applicable customary); s 2(b) Customary Law and Local Courts Act 1990 (Zimbabwe) (“customary law” means the customary law of the people of Zimbabwe, or of any section or community of such people”); s 258(1) Evidence Act 2011 (Nigeria) (“Custom” is a rule which, in a particular district, has, from long usage, obtained the force of law”). On the inherent transnational character of customary law see Mancuso (2007), p. 176.

  43. 43.

    On the integration of customary courts into the received legal system see Fombad (2013), p. 113. See also Common Law and Customary Laws Act 1969 (Botswana). For Swaziland see Whelpton (2005), p. 348. On indigenous standards see Oba (2010), pp. 76–78.

  44. 44.

    Jordaan (2017), p. 402. And see Himonga et al. (2013), p. 369; Oko Elechi et al. (2010), p. 73; Louw (2006), p. 161.

  45. 45.

    See van der Waal (2004), p. 113: “Benefits […] include the fact that the customary courts are more open (‘like democracy’) because all adults can participate in them, they are public and they keep traditions alive. A lawyer is not needed since the system is not professionally driven and the fines are not high. The emphasis is on social outcomes rather than on individualizing outcomes.”

  46. 46.

    See Himonga and Nhapo (2014), pp. 253–254.

References

  • Ajani G et al (2018) Diritto comparato. Lezioni e materiali, Turin

    Google Scholar 

  • Allott AN (1967) Law in the New Africa. Afr Aff 66(262):55

    Google Scholar 

  • Allott AN (1968) African law. In: Derrett JDM (ed) An introduction to legal systems, London, p 131 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JND (1962) The future of Islamic law in British commonwealth territories in Africa. Law Contemp Probl 27(4):617

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamodu G (1994) Transnational law, unification and harmonization of international commercial law in Africa. J Afr Law 38(2):127

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett TW (2011) An African doctrine of equity in South African public law. Loyola Law Rev 57(4):710

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett TW (2019) Comparative law and African customary law. In: Reimann M, Zimmermann R (eds) The Oxford handbook of comparative law, 2nd edn, Oxford, p 652

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc-Jouvan X (1964) Development of a new law code in Madagascar. Afr Today 11:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagbanja DN (2015) Customary Tort law in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Bussani M, Sebok AJ (eds) Comparative Tort law. Global perspectives, Cheltenham, p 412

    Google Scholar 

  • David R et al (2016) Les grands systèmes de droit contemporains, 12th edn, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • du Plessis J (2019) Comparative law and the study of mixed legal systems. In: Reimann M, Zimmermann R (eds) The Oxford handbook of comparative law, 2nd edn, Oxford, p 474

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard C, Vernicos G (eds) (2006) La Quête Anthropologique du Droit: Autour de la Démarche d’Étienne le Roy, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt SN (1965) Social change and modernization in African societies South of the Sahara. Cahiers d’études africaines 5(19):453

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias O (1955) The nature of African customary law, Manchester, pp 228–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher GP (1998) Comparative law as a subversive discipline. Am J Comp Law 46(4):684

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombad CM (2013) The Botswana legal system, Durban, p 48

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick D (1922) Lugard’s seminal book The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa, Edinburgh, pp 192–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambaro A, Sacco R (2009) Sistemi guridici comparati, 2nd edn. Turin, UTET

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn HP (2014) Legal traditions of the world: sustainable diversity in law, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 60

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant E (2006) Human rights, cultural diversity and customary law in South Africa. J Afr Law 50(1):13

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosswald Curran V (2009) Comparative law and the legal origins thesis: ‘[N]on scholae sed vitae discimus’”. Am J Comp Law 57(4):863

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer M (1998) ‘Stool rights’ and modern land law in Ghana: a geographical perspective on the transformation of tradition. Afr Spectrum 33(3):311

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris J (1912) Dawn in darkest Africa, London, p 97

    Google Scholar 

  • Himonga C, Nhapo T (eds) (2014) African customary law in South Africa. Post-apartheid living law perspectives. Oxford University Press Southern Africa, Cape Town, pp 9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Himonga C et al (2013) Reflections on judicial views of Ubuntu. Potchefstroomse Elektronies Regsblad 16(5):369

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme P (1995) Including America. ARIEL A Rev Int English Lit 26(1):120

    Google Scholar 

  • Joireman SF (2010) Entrapment or freedom: enforcing customary property rights regimes in common-law Africa. In: Fenrich JM et al (eds) The future of African customary law, Cambridge, p 298

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordaan DW (2017) The open society: what does it really mean? De Jure 50(2):402

    Google Scholar 

  • Juma L (2011) The laws of Lerotholi: role and status of codified rules of custom in the Kingdom of Lesotho. Pace Int Law Rev 23(1):92

    Google Scholar 

  • Kischel U (2019) Comparative law. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Klerman D, Mahoney PG (2007) Legal origin. J Comp Econ 35:278

    Google Scholar 

  • Leman P (2009) Singing the law: Okot p’Bitek’s legal imagination and the poetics of traditional justice. Res Afr Liter 40:109

    Google Scholar 

  • Louw DJ (2006) The African concept of Ubuntu and restorative justice. In: Sullivan D, Tifft L (eds) Handbook of restorative justice. A global perspective, Abingdon, p 161

    Google Scholar 

  • M’Baye K (1976) The African conception of the law. In: David R (chied editor) International Encyclopedia of comparative law, volume II, the legal systems of the world. Their comparison and unification (Tübingen et al.), p 138

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancuso S (2007) Trends on the harmonisation of contract law in Africa. Ann Surv Int Comp Law 13(1):174

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann G (2009) What was the “Indigénat”? The ‘empire of law’ in French West Africa. J Afr Hist 50(3):336

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann K, Roberts R (eds) (1991) Law in colonial Africa. Heinemann/James Currey, Portsmouth/London, p 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mar LP (1960) Social change in Africa. Int Aff 36(4):447

    Google Scholar 

  • Martina Locher T (2016) How come others are selling our land?’ Customary land rights and the complex process of land acquisition in Tanzania. J East Afr Stud 10(3):395–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Menski WF (2006) Comparative law in a global context: the legal systems of Asia and Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merryman JH (1977) Comparative law and social change: on the origins, style, decline and revival of the law and development movement. Am J Comp Law 25(3):457

    Google Scholar 

  • Molte L (1967) Sources et Tendances du Droit Moderne à Madagascar. Can J Afr Stud/Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines 1(2):123

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir Watt H (2012) Further terrains for subversive comparison: the field of global governance and the public/private divide. In: Monateri PG (ed) Methods of comparative law, Cheltenham, p 270

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndulo M (2011) African customary law, customs, and women’s rights. Indiana J Glob Legal Stud 18(1):89

    Google Scholar 

  • Ntampaka C (2005) Introduction aux systèmes juridiques africains. Namur

    Google Scholar 

  • Oba AA (2010) The future of customary law in Africa. In: Fenrich JM et al (eds) The future of African customary law, Cambridge, p 79

    Google Scholar 

  • Oko Elechi O et al (2010) Restoring Justice (Ubuntu): an African perspective. Int Crim Just Rev 20(1):73

    Google Scholar 

  • Oto-Peralía D, Romero-Ávila D (2017) Legal traditions, legal reforms and economic performance. Theory and evidence, Wien, p 85

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer VV (ed) (2012) Mixed jurisdictions worldwide, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 625

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prinsloo MW (1987) Restatement of indigenous law. Comp Int Law J South Afr 20(3):411

    Google Scholar 

  • Rambaud T (2017) Introduction au droit comparé, 2nd edn. Presses Unversitaires de Frances, Paris

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ranger T (1983) The invention of tradition in colonial Africa. In: Hobsbawm E, Ranger T (eds) The invention of tradition, Cambridge, p 211, 212

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard J (1997) Democratization in Africa after 1989: comparative and theoretical perspectives. Comp Polit 29(3):363

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S (1979) Order and dispute: an introduction to legal anthropology. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacco R (2006) Il diritto africano. Turin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacco R (2009) Le droit africain: anthropologie et droit positif. Dalloz-Sirey, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacco R (2012) The sub-Saharan legal tradition. In: Bussani M, Mattei U (eds) The Cambridge companion to comparative law, Cambridge, p 313 et seq

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman RB (1979) Law and stratification: the African Case. Contemp Crises 3:17

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey HJ (2013) African colonial states. In: Reid R, Parker J (eds) The Oxford handbook of modern African history, Oxford, pp 153–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumba T (2015) Revising legal harmonisation under the Southern African development community treaty: the need to amend the treaty. Law Democracy Dev 19:127

    Google Scholar 

  • Siems M (2016) Varieties of legal systems: towards a new global taxonomy? J Inst Econ 12:579

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinitsina I (1994) African legal tradition: J. M. Sarbah, J. B. Danquah, N. A. Ollennu. In: Dundes Renteln A (ed) Folk law: essays in the theory and practice of Lex Non Scripta, vol 1, Madison, p 264

    Google Scholar 

  • Sippel H (1998) Customary family law in colonial Tanganyika: a study of change and continuity. Comp Int Law J South Afr 31(3):378

    Google Scholar 

  • Ubink J (2010) The quest for customary law in African State Courts. In: Fenrich JM et al (eds) The future of African customary law, Cambridge, p 96

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcke C (2018) Comparing law. Comparative law as reconstruction of collective commitments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van der Waal KCS (2004) Formal and informal dispute resolution in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Anthropol South Afr 27(3–4):113

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderinden J (1983) Les Systèmes juridiques africains, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlinden J (1996) Anthropologique juridique. Dalloz, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlinden J (2000) Les droits africains entre positivisme et pluralisme. Bulletin de séances de l’Académie royale de sciences d’Oute-Mer 46:279

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderlinden J (2006) Ex Africa Semper. Revue internationale de droit comparé 58(4):1187

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelpton FR (2005) The Indigenous Swazi law of court procedure: a restatement. J South Afr Law/Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg 2:348

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman G (2010) A survey of customary laws in Africa in search of lesson for the future. In: Fenrich JM et al (eds) The future of African customary law, Cambridge, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann R, Visser D (1996) Introduction. South African law as a mixed legal system. In: Zimmermann R, Visser D (eds) Southern cross: civil law and common law in South Africa, Oxford, pp 7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Zweigert K, Kötz H (1996) Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung, 3rd edn. Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mousourakis, G. (2019). African Legal Traditions. In: Comparative Law and Legal Traditions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28281-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28281-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28280-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28281-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics